ETS variant 4
Overview
Neoblast Clusters
Zeng et. al., 2018▻ Overview▻ Neoblast Population▻ Sub-lethal Irradiated Surviving X1 and X2 Cell Population
Overview
Single cell RNA-seq of pluripotent neoblasts and its early progeniesWe isolated X1 neoblasts cells enriched in high piwi-1 expression (Neoblast Population), and profiled ∼7,614 individual cells via scRNA-seq. Unsupervised analyses uncovered 12 distinct classes from 7,088 high-quality cells. We designated these classes Nb1 to Nb12 and ordered them based on high (Nb1) to low (Nb12) piwi-1 expression levels. We further defined groups of genes that best classified the cells parsed into 12 distinct cell clusters to generate a scaled expression heat map of discriminative gene sets for each cluster. Expression of each cluster’s gene signatures was validated using multiplex fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) co-stained with piwi-1 and largely confirmed the cell clusters revealed by scRNA-seq.We also tested sub-lethal irradiation exposure. To profile rare pluripotent stem cells (PSCs) and avoid interference from immediate progenitor cells, we determined a time point after sub-lethal irradiation (7 DPI) with minimal piwi-1+ cells, followed by isolation and single-cell RNA-seq of 1,200 individual cells derived from X1 (Piwi-1 high) and X2 (Piwi-1 low) cell populations (Sub-lethal Irradiated Surviving X1 and X2 Cell Population)Explore this single cell expression dataset with our NB Cluster Shiny App
Neoblast Population
Sub-lethal Irradiated Surviving X1 and X2 Cell Population
Embryonic Expression
Davies et. al., 2017
Hover the mouse over a column in the graph to view average RPKM values per sample. Embryonic Stages: Y: yolk. S2-S8: Stages 2-8. C4: asexual adult. SX: virgin, sexually mature adult. back to top Anatomical Expression
PAGE et. al., 2020SMED30032308 has been reported as being expressed in these anatomical structures and/or regions. Read more about PAGEPAGE Curations: 3
Homology
BLAST of ETS variant 4 vs. Ensembl Human
Match: ETV4 (ETS variant transcription factor 4 [Source:HGNC Symbol;Acc:HGNC:3493]) HSP 1 Score: 131.724 bits (330), Expect = 2.338e-35 Identity = 71/112 (63.39%), Postives = 81/112 (72.32%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 629 RGNPQLWQFXXXXXXXXXXXXVICWTGRDKEFKLIEPEEVARLWGAQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYDKNIMQKVPGERYVYKFTDNCLPDNIL-VSSPNNSGMDLSMNLIHP 961 RG QLWQFL++LL D ++ I WTGR EFKLIEPEEVARLWG QKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYY+K IMQKV GERYVYKF C P+ + ++ P+N L P Sbjct: 61 RGALQLWQFLVALLDDPTNAHFIAWTGRGMEFKLIEPEEVARLWGIQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYEKGIMQKVAGERYVYKFV--CEPEALFSLAFPDNQRPALKAEFDRP 170
BLAST of ETS variant 4 vs. Ensembl Human
Match: ETV4 (ETS variant transcription factor 4 [Source:HGNC Symbol;Acc:HGNC:3493]) HSP 1 Score: 132.109 bits (331), Expect = 1.566e-33 Identity = 71/112 (63.39%), Postives = 81/112 (72.32%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 629 RGNPQLWQFXXXXXXXXXXXXVICWTGRDKEFKLIEPEEVARLWGAQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYDKNIMQKVPGERYVYKFTDNCLPDNIL-VSSPNNSGMDLSMNLIHP 961 RG QLWQFL++LL D ++ I WTGR EFKLIEPEEVARLWG QKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYY+K IMQKV GERYVYKF C P+ + ++ P+N L P Sbjct: 284 RGALQLWQFLVALLDDPTNAHFIAWTGRGMEFKLIEPEEVARLWGIQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYEKGIMQKVAGERYVYKFV--CEPEALFSLAFPDNQRPALKAEFDRP 393
BLAST of ETS variant 4 vs. Ensembl Human
Match: ETV4 (ETS variant transcription factor 4 [Source:HGNC Symbol;Acc:HGNC:3493]) HSP 1 Score: 132.494 bits (332), Expect = 1.599e-33 Identity = 71/112 (63.39%), Postives = 81/112 (72.32%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 629 RGNPQLWQFXXXXXXXXXXXXVICWTGRDKEFKLIEPEEVARLWGAQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYDKNIMQKVPGERYVYKFTDNCLPDNIL-VSSPNNSGMDLSMNLIHP 961 RG QLWQFL++LL D ++ I WTGR EFKLIEPEEVARLWG QKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYY+K IMQKV GERYVYKF C P+ + ++ P+N L P Sbjct: 299 RGALQLWQFLVALLDDPTNAHFIAWTGRGMEFKLIEPEEVARLWGIQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYEKGIMQKVAGERYVYKFV--CEPEALFSLAFPDNQRPALKAEFDRP 408
BLAST of ETS variant 4 vs. Ensembl Human
Match: ETV4 (ETS variant transcription factor 4 [Source:HGNC Symbol;Acc:HGNC:3493]) HSP 1 Score: 132.494 bits (332), Expect = 1.599e-33 Identity = 71/112 (63.39%), Postives = 81/112 (72.32%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 629 RGNPQLWQFXXXXXXXXXXXXVICWTGRDKEFKLIEPEEVARLWGAQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYDKNIMQKVPGERYVYKFTDNCLPDNIL-VSSPNNSGMDLSMNLIHP 961 RG QLWQFL++LL D ++ I WTGR EFKLIEPEEVARLWG QKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYY+K IMQKV GERYVYKF C P+ + ++ P+N L P Sbjct: 299 RGALQLWQFLVALLDDPTNAHFIAWTGRGMEFKLIEPEEVARLWGIQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYEKGIMQKVAGERYVYKFV--CEPEALFSLAFPDNQRPALKAEFDRP 408
BLAST of ETS variant 4 vs. Ensembl Human
Match: ETV4 (ETS variant transcription factor 4 [Source:HGNC Symbol;Acc:HGNC:3493]) HSP 1 Score: 132.494 bits (332), Expect = 2.725e-33 Identity = 71/112 (63.39%), Postives = 81/112 (72.32%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 629 RGNPQLWQFXXXXXXXXXXXXVICWTGRDKEFKLIEPEEVARLWGAQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYDKNIMQKVPGERYVYKFTDNCLPDNIL-VSSPNNSGMDLSMNLIHP 961 RG QLWQFL++LL D ++ I WTGR EFKLIEPEEVARLWG QKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYY+K IMQKV GERYVYKF C P+ + ++ P+N L P Sbjct: 338 RGALQLWQFLVALLDDPTNAHFIAWTGRGMEFKLIEPEEVARLWGIQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYEKGIMQKVAGERYVYKFV--CEPEALFSLAFPDNQRPALKAEFDRP 447
BLAST of ETS variant 4 vs. Ensembl Celegans
Match: ast-1 (Axon STeering defect [Source:UniProtKB/TrEMBL;Acc:Q22355]) HSP 1 Score: 114.39 bits (285), Expect = 6.805e-28 Identity = 66/128 (51.56%), Postives = 83/128 (64.84%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 611 SKGLAERGN--PQLWQFXXXXXXXXXXXXVICWTGRDKEFKLIEPEEVARLWGAQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYDKNIMQKVPGERYVYKFTDNCLPDNI---LVSSPNNSGMDLSMNLIHPDMINYT 979 SK LA G+ QLWQFLL LL D R+S VI W G EFKL++P+EVAR WG +K++P MNYDK+SR+LRYYYDKNIM KV G+RY YKF + + S P + +M I PD ++T Sbjct: 203 SKNLAHSGSGQTQLWQFLLELLSDKRYSEVITWEGTQGEFKLVDPDEVARKWGERKSKPNMNYDKMSRALRYYYDKNIMAKVHGKRYAYKFDFQGIAQALQPPTASHPQDYFNSHAMGRIAPDFSSWT 330
BLAST of ETS variant 4 vs. Ensembl Celegans
Match: ets-5 (ETS domain-containing transcription factor ets-5 [Source:UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot;Acc:Q18579]) HSP 1 Score: 109.768 bits (273), Expect = 1.080e-27 Identity = 53/82 (64.63%), Postives = 65/82 (79.27%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 632 GNPQLWQFXXXXXXXXXXXXVICWTGRDKEFKLIEPEEVARLWGAQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYDKNIMQKVPGERYVYKF 877 G QLWQFLL LL D+ ++ I W G + EFKL++P+EVAR WG +K++P MNYDKLSR+LRYYYDKNIM KV G+RY YKF Sbjct: 33 GQIQLWQFLLELLADAVNAHCIAWEGSNGEFKLVDPDEVARKWGERKSKPNMNYDKLSRALRYYYDKNIMTKVQGKRYAYKF 114
BLAST of ETS variant 4 vs. Ensembl Celegans
Match: ets-5 (ETS domain-containing transcription factor ets-5 [Source:UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot;Acc:Q18579]) HSP 1 Score: 109.768 bits (273), Expect = 2.364e-27 Identity = 53/82 (64.63%), Postives = 65/82 (79.27%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 632 GNPQLWQFXXXXXXXXXXXXVICWTGRDKEFKLIEPEEVARLWGAQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYDKNIMQKVPGERYVYKF 877 G QLWQFLL LL D+ ++ I W G + EFKL++P+EVAR WG +K++P MNYDKLSR+LRYYYDKNIM KV G+RY YKF Sbjct: 71 GQIQLWQFLLELLADAVNAHCIAWEGSNGEFKLVDPDEVARKWGERKSKPNMNYDKLSRALRYYYDKNIMTKVQGKRYAYKF 152
BLAST of ETS variant 4 vs. Ensembl Celegans
Match: lin-1 (LIN-1 [Source:UniProtKB/TrEMBL;Acc:G5EDL0]) HSP 1 Score: 97.0561 bits (240), Expect = 1.003e-21 Identity = 54/100 (54.00%), Postives = 69/100 (69.00%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 644 LWQFXXXXXXXXXXXXVICWT-GRDKEFKLIEPEEVARLWGAQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYDKNIMQKVPGERYVYKF--TDNCLPDNILVSSPNNSGM 934 LWQFLL LL ++ +I WT G D EF+LI+ E VAR WG +K +P MNYDKLSR+LRYYY+KNI++KV G+++VY+F TD P SS N M Sbjct: 26 LWQFLLELLQQDQNGDIIEWTRGTDGEFRLIDAEAVARKWGQRKAKPHMNYDKLSRALRYYYEKNIIKKVIGKKFVYRFVTTDAHAPPTADFSSNMNMKM 125
BLAST of ETS variant 4 vs. Ensembl Celegans
Match: lin-1 (LIN-1 [Source:UniProtKB/TrEMBL;Acc:G5EDL0]) HSP 1 Score: 97.0561 bits (240), Expect = 1.003e-21 Identity = 54/100 (54.00%), Postives = 69/100 (69.00%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 644 LWQFXXXXXXXXXXXXVICWT-GRDKEFKLIEPEEVARLWGAQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYDKNIMQKVPGERYVYKF--TDNCLPDNILVSSPNNSGM 934 LWQFLL LL ++ +I WT G D EF+LI+ E VAR WG +K +P MNYDKLSR+LRYYY+KNI++KV G+++VY+F TD P SS N M Sbjct: 26 LWQFLLELLQQDQNGDIIEWTRGTDGEFRLIDAEAVARKWGQRKAKPHMNYDKLSRALRYYYEKNIIKKVIGKKFVYRFVTTDAHAPPTADFSSNMNMKM 125
BLAST of ETS variant 4 vs. Ensembl Fly
Match: Ets96B (gene:FBgn0039225 transcript:FBtr0339254) HSP 1 Score: 129.798 bits (325), Expect = 3.276e-32 Identity = 66/104 (63.46%), Postives = 81/104 (77.88%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 602 NNNSKGLAER-GNPQLWQFXXXXXXX-XXXXXVICWTGRDKEFKLIEPEEVARLWGAQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYDKNIMQKVPGERYVYKFTDNCLPDNIL 907 ++N + +++R G+ QLWQFL++LL + + + I WTGR EFKLIEPEEVAR WG QKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYY+K IMQKV GERYVY+F C PD + Sbjct: 476 SSNGQAISQRRGSLQLWQFLVALLDEPTTSASCIAWTGRGMEFKLIEPEEVARRWGLQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYEKGIMQKVNGERYVYRFV--CDPDALF 577
BLAST of ETS variant 4 vs. Ensembl Fly
Match: Ets96B (gene:FBgn0039225 transcript:FBtr0084697) HSP 1 Score: 129.798 bits (325), Expect = 4.210e-32 Identity = 66/104 (63.46%), Postives = 81/104 (77.88%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 602 NNNSKGLAER-GNPQLWQFXXXXXXX-XXXXXVICWTGRDKEFKLIEPEEVARLWGAQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYDKNIMQKVPGERYVYKFTDNCLPDNIL 907 ++N + +++R G+ QLWQFL++LL + + + I WTGR EFKLIEPEEVAR WG QKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYY+K IMQKV GERYVY+F C PD + Sbjct: 485 SSNGQAISQRRGSLQLWQFLVALLDEPTTSASCIAWTGRGMEFKLIEPEEVARRWGLQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYEKGIMQKVNGERYVYRFV--CDPDALF 586
BLAST of ETS variant 4 vs. Ensembl Fly
Match: Ets65A (gene:FBgn0005658 transcript:FBtr0077055) HSP 1 Score: 107.842 bits (268), Expect = 2.206e-26 Identity = 54/82 (65.85%), Postives = 64/82 (78.05%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 632 GNPQLWQFXXXXXXXXXXXXVICWTGRDKEFKLIEPEEVARLWGAQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYDKNIMQKVPGERYVYKF 877 G QLWQFLL LL DS ++ I W G + EFKL +P+EVAR WG +K++P MNYDKLSR+LRYYYDKNIM KV G+RY YKF Sbjct: 82 GQIQLWQFLLELLSDSNNASCITWEGTNGEFKLTDPDEVARRWGERKSKPNMNYDKLSRALRYYYDKNIMTKVHGKRYAYKF 163
BLAST of ETS variant 4 vs. Ensembl Fly
Match: Ets21C (gene:FBgn0005660 transcript:FBtr0112854) HSP 1 Score: 107.842 bits (268), Expect = 5.289e-26 Identity = 55/87 (63.22%), Postives = 66/87 (75.86%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 632 GNPQLWQFXXXXXXXXXXXXVICWTGRDKEFKLIEPEEVARLWGAQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYDKNIMQKVPGERYVYKFTDNCL 892 G QLWQFLL LL DS ++ I W G+ EF+LI+P+EVAR WG +K +P MNYDKLSR+LRYYYDKNIM KV G+RY YKF + L Sbjct: 83 GQIQLWQFLLELLADSSNANAISWEGQSGEFRLIDPDEVARRWGERKAKPNMNYDKLSRALRYYYDKNIMTKVHGKRYAYKFDFHGL 169
BLAST of ETS variant 4 vs. Ensembl Fly
Match: Ets65A (gene:FBgn0005658 transcript:FBtr0077054) HSP 1 Score: 108.997 bits (271), Expect = 2.098e-25 Identity = 54/82 (65.85%), Postives = 64/82 (78.05%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 632 GNPQLWQFXXXXXXXXXXXXVICWTGRDKEFKLIEPEEVARLWGAQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYDKNIMQKVPGERYVYKF 877 G QLWQFLL LL DS ++ I W G + EFKL +P+EVAR WG +K++P MNYDKLSR+LRYYYDKNIM KV G+RY YKF Sbjct: 315 GQIQLWQFLLELLSDSNNASCITWEGTNGEFKLTDPDEVARRWGERKSKPNMNYDKLSRALRYYYDKNIMTKVHGKRYAYKF 396
BLAST of ETS variant 4 vs. Ensembl Zebrafish
Match: etv5b (ETS variant transcription factor 5b [Source:ZFIN;Acc:ZDB-GENE-991228-4]) HSP 1 Score: 132.88 bits (333), Expect = 1.278e-33 Identity = 70/104 (67.31%), Postives = 81/104 (77.88%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 617 GLAERGNPQLWQFXXXXXXXXXXXXVICWTGRDKEFKLIEPEEVARLWGAQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYDKNIMQKVPGERYVYKFTDNCLPDNIL-VSSPNN 925 G+ E+G+ QLWQFL++LL D + I WTGR EFKLIEPEEVAR WG QKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYY+K IMQKV GERYVYKF C PD + ++ P+N Sbjct: 326 GMTEKGSLQLWQFLVTLLDDPSNGHFITWTGRGLEFKLIEPEEVARRWGIQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYEKGIMQKVAGERYVYKFV--CDPDALFSMAFPDN 427
BLAST of ETS variant 4 vs. Ensembl Zebrafish
Match: etv4 (ETS variant transcription factor 4 [Source:NCBI gene;Acc:30700]) HSP 1 Score: 132.88 bits (333), Expect = 1.330e-33 Identity = 70/109 (64.22%), Postives = 82/109 (75.23%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 629 RGNPQLWQFXXXXXXXXXXXXVICWTGRDKEFKLIEPEEVARLWGAQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYDKNIMQKVPGERYVYKFTDNCLPDNIL-VSSPNNSGMDLSMNL 952 RG+ QLWQFL++LL D ++ I WTGR EFKLIEPEEVARLWG QKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYY+K IMQKV GERYVYKF C P+ ++ ++ P+N L Sbjct: 347 RGSLQLWQFLVALLDDPSNAHFIAWTGRGMEFKLIEPEEVARLWGMQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYEKGIMQKVAGERYVYKFV--CEPEALISLAFPDNQRPSLKAEF 453
BLAST of ETS variant 4 vs. Ensembl Zebrafish
Match: etv4 (ETS variant transcription factor 4 [Source:NCBI gene;Acc:30700]) HSP 1 Score: 132.88 bits (333), Expect = 1.330e-33 Identity = 70/109 (64.22%), Postives = 82/109 (75.23%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 629 RGNPQLWQFXXXXXXXXXXXXVICWTGRDKEFKLIEPEEVARLWGAQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYDKNIMQKVPGERYVYKFTDNCLPDNIL-VSSPNNSGMDLSMNL 952 RG+ QLWQFL++LL D ++ I WTGR EFKLIEPEEVARLWG QKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYY+K IMQKV GERYVYKF C P+ ++ ++ P+N L Sbjct: 347 RGSLQLWQFLVALLDDPSNAHFIAWTGRGMEFKLIEPEEVARLWGMQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYEKGIMQKVAGERYVYKFV--CEPEALISLAFPDNQRPSLKAEF 453
BLAST of ETS variant 4 vs. Ensembl Zebrafish
Match: etv1 (ETS variant transcription factor 1 [Source:ZFIN;Acc:ZDB-GENE-070104-1]) HSP 1 Score: 130.183 bits (326), Expect = 9.719e-33 Identity = 76/134 (56.72%), Postives = 92/134 (68.66%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 629 RGNPQLWQFXXXXXXXXXXXXVICWTGRDKEFKLIEPEEVARLWGAQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYDKNIMQKVPGERYVYKFTDNCLPDNIL-VSSPNNSGMDLSMNLIHPDMINYTICYPIQNSNEFHSSVQ 1027 RG+ QLWQFL++LL D +S I WTGR EFKLIEPEEVAR WG QKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYY+K IMQKV GERYVYKF C P+ + ++ P+N L +L IN P+ + +E + +Q Sbjct: 331 RGSLQLWQFLVALLDDPSNSHFIAWTGRGMEFKLIEPEEVARRWGIQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYEKGIMQKVAGERYVYKFV--CDPEALFSMAFPDNQRPVLKTDLER--QINEEDTVPLSHFDENMAYIQ 460
BLAST of ETS variant 4 vs. Ensembl Zebrafish
Match: etv1 (ETS variant transcription factor 1 [Source:ZFIN;Acc:ZDB-GENE-070104-1]) HSP 1 Score: 130.183 bits (326), Expect = 9.719e-33 Identity = 76/134 (56.72%), Postives = 92/134 (68.66%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 629 RGNPQLWQFXXXXXXXXXXXXVICWTGRDKEFKLIEPEEVARLWGAQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYDKNIMQKVPGERYVYKFTDNCLPDNIL-VSSPNNSGMDLSMNLIHPDMINYTICYPIQNSNEFHSSVQ 1027 RG+ QLWQFL++LL D +S I WTGR EFKLIEPEEVAR WG QKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYY+K IMQKV GERYVYKF C P+ + ++ P+N L +L IN P+ + +E + +Q Sbjct: 331 RGSLQLWQFLVALLDDPSNSHFIAWTGRGMEFKLIEPEEVARRWGIQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYEKGIMQKVAGERYVYKFV--CDPEALFSMAFPDNQRPVLKTDLER--QINEEDTVPLSHFDENMAYIQ 460
BLAST of ETS variant 4 vs. Ensembl Xenopus
Match: ENSXETT00000029479.1 (pep primary_assembly:Xenopus_tropicalis_v9.1:10:23638928:23650532:1 gene:ENSXETG00000004517.1 transcript:ENSXETT00000029479.1 gene_biotype:protein_coding transcript_biotype:protein_coding) HSP 1 Score: 132.494 bits (332), Expect = 4.192e-35 Identity = 69/100 (69.00%), Postives = 79/100 (79.00%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 629 RGNPQLWQFXXXXXXXXXXXXVICWTGRDKEFKLIEPEEVARLWGAQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYDKNIMQKVPGERYVYKFTDNCLPDNILVSSPNNS 928 RG+ QLWQFL++LL + +S I WTGR EFKLIEPEEVARLWG QKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYY+K IMQKV GERYVYKF C P+ + + N+S Sbjct: 137 RGSLQLWQFLVALLDNPTNSHFIAWTGRGMEFKLIEPEEVARLWGMQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYEKGIMQKVAGERYVYKFV--CDPEALFSLAFNDS 234
BLAST of ETS variant 4 vs. Ensembl Xenopus
Match: ENSXETT00000029485.1 (pep primary_assembly:Xenopus_tropicalis_v9.1:10:23638928:23650532:1 gene:ENSXETG00000004517.1 transcript:ENSXETT00000029485.1 gene_biotype:protein_coding transcript_biotype:protein_coding) HSP 1 Score: 132.109 bits (331), Expect = 9.684e-35 Identity = 69/100 (69.00%), Postives = 79/100 (79.00%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 629 RGNPQLWQFXXXXXXXXXXXXVICWTGRDKEFKLIEPEEVARLWGAQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYDKNIMQKVPGERYVYKFTDNCLPDNILVSSPNNS 928 RG+ QLWQFL++LL + +S I WTGR EFKLIEPEEVARLWG QKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYY+K IMQKV GERYVYKF C P+ + + N+S Sbjct: 168 RGSLQLWQFLVALLDNPTNSHFIAWTGRGMEFKLIEPEEVARLWGMQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYEKGIMQKVAGERYVYKFV--CDPEALFSLAFNDS 265
BLAST of ETS variant 4 vs. Ensembl Xenopus
Match: etv1 (ETS variant transcription factor 1 [Source:NCBI gene;Acc:394827]) HSP 1 Score: 127.872 bits (320), Expect = 5.230e-32 Identity = 70/109 (64.22%), Postives = 82/109 (75.23%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 629 RGNPQLWQFXXXXXXXXXXXXVICWTGRDKEFKLIEPEEVARLWGAQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYDKNIMQKVPGERYVYKFTDNCLPDNIL-VSSPNNSGMDLSMNL 952 RG+ QLWQFL++LL D +S I WTGR EFKLIEPEEVAR WG QKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYY+K IMQKV GERYVYKF C P+ + ++ P+N L ++ Sbjct: 292 RGSLQLWQFLVALLDDPANSHFIAWTGRGMEFKLIEPEEVARRWGIQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYEKGIMQKVAGERYVYKFV--CDPEALFSMAFPDNQRPLLKTDI 398
BLAST of ETS variant 4 vs. Ensembl Xenopus
Match: etv1 (ETS variant transcription factor 1 [Source:NCBI gene;Acc:394827]) HSP 1 Score: 127.872 bits (320), Expect = 6.860e-32 Identity = 70/109 (64.22%), Postives = 82/109 (75.23%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 629 RGNPQLWQFXXXXXXXXXXXXVICWTGRDKEFKLIEPEEVARLWGAQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYDKNIMQKVPGERYVYKFTDNCLPDNIL-VSSPNNSGMDLSMNL 952 RG+ QLWQFL++LL D +S I WTGR EFKLIEPEEVAR WG QKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYY+K IMQKV GERYVYKF C P+ + ++ P+N L ++ Sbjct: 314 RGSLQLWQFLVALLDDPANSHFIAWTGRGMEFKLIEPEEVARRWGIQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYEKGIMQKVAGERYVYKFV--CDPEALFSMAFPDNQRPLLKTDI 420
BLAST of ETS variant 4 vs. Ensembl Xenopus
Match: etv1 (ETS variant transcription factor 1 [Source:NCBI gene;Acc:394827]) HSP 1 Score: 128.257 bits (321), Expect = 7.104e-32 Identity = 70/109 (64.22%), Postives = 82/109 (75.23%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 629 RGNPQLWQFXXXXXXXXXXXXVICWTGRDKEFKLIEPEEVARLWGAQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYDKNIMQKVPGERYVYKFTDNCLPDNIL-VSSPNNSGMDLSMNL 952 RG+ QLWQFL++LL D +S I WTGR EFKLIEPEEVAR WG QKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYY+K IMQKV GERYVYKF C P+ + ++ P+N L ++ Sbjct: 324 RGSLQLWQFLVALLDDPANSHFIAWTGRGMEFKLIEPEEVARRWGIQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYEKGIMQKVAGERYVYKFV--CDPEALFSMAFPDNQRPLLKTDI 430
BLAST of ETS variant 4 vs. Ensembl Mouse
Match: Etv4 (ets variant 4 [Source:MGI Symbol;Acc:MGI:99423]) HSP 1 Score: 132.494 bits (332), Expect = 1.599e-33 Identity = 71/112 (63.39%), Postives = 81/112 (72.32%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 629 RGNPQLWQFXXXXXXXXXXXXVICWTGRDKEFKLIEPEEVARLWGAQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYDKNIMQKVPGERYVYKFTDNCLPDNIL-VSSPNNSGMDLSMNLIHP 961 RG QLWQFL++LL D ++ I WTGR EFKLIEPEEVARLWG QKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYY+K IMQKV GERYVYKF C P+ + ++ P+N L P Sbjct: 334 RGALQLWQFLVALLDDPTNAHFIAWTGRGMEFKLIEPEEVARLWGIQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYEKGIMQKVAGERYVYKFV--CEPEALFSLAFPDNQRPALKAEFDRP 443
BLAST of ETS variant 4 vs. Ensembl Mouse
Match: Etv4 (ets variant 4 [Source:MGI Symbol;Acc:MGI:99423]) HSP 1 Score: 132.494 bits (332), Expect = 1.789e-33 Identity = 71/112 (63.39%), Postives = 81/112 (72.32%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 629 RGNPQLWQFXXXXXXXXXXXXVICWTGRDKEFKLIEPEEVARLWGAQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYDKNIMQKVPGERYVYKFTDNCLPDNIL-VSSPNNSGMDLSMNLIHP 961 RG QLWQFL++LL D ++ I WTGR EFKLIEPEEVARLWG QKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYY+K IMQKV GERYVYKF C P+ + ++ P+N L P Sbjct: 340 RGALQLWQFLVALLDDPTNAHFIAWTGRGMEFKLIEPEEVARLWGIQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYEKGIMQKVAGERYVYKFV--CEPEALFSLAFPDNQRPALKAEFDRP 449
BLAST of ETS variant 4 vs. Ensembl Mouse
Match: Etv4 (ets variant 4 [Source:MGI Symbol;Acc:MGI:99423]) HSP 1 Score: 132.494 bits (332), Expect = 1.803e-33 Identity = 71/112 (63.39%), Postives = 81/112 (72.32%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 629 RGNPQLWQFXXXXXXXXXXXXVICWTGRDKEFKLIEPEEVARLWGAQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYDKNIMQKVPGERYVYKFTDNCLPDNIL-VSSPNNSGMDLSMNLIHP 961 RG QLWQFL++LL D ++ I WTGR EFKLIEPEEVARLWG QKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYY+K IMQKV GERYVYKF C P+ + ++ P+N L P Sbjct: 339 RGALQLWQFLVALLDDPTNAHFIAWTGRGMEFKLIEPEEVARLWGIQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYEKGIMQKVAGERYVYKFV--CEPEALFSLAFPDNQRPALKAEFDRP 448
BLAST of ETS variant 4 vs. Ensembl Mouse
Match: Etv1 (ets variant 1 [Source:MGI Symbol;Acc:MGI:99254]) HSP 1 Score: 127.872 bits (320), Expect = 1.856e-32 Identity = 70/109 (64.22%), Postives = 82/109 (75.23%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 629 RGNPQLWQFXXXXXXXXXXXXVICWTGRDKEFKLIEPEEVARLWGAQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYDKNIMQKVPGERYVYKFTDNCLPDNIL-VSSPNNSGMDLSMNL 952 RG+ QLWQFL++LL D +S I WTGR EFKLIEPEEVAR WG QKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYY+K IMQKV GERYVYKF C P+ + ++ P+N L ++ Sbjct: 229 RGSLQLWQFLVALLDDPSNSHFIAWTGRGMEFKLIEPEEVARRWGIQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYEKGIMQKVAGERYVYKFV--CDPEALFSMAFPDNQRPLLKTDM 335
BLAST of ETS variant 4 vs. Ensembl Mouse
Match: Etv5 (ets variant 5 [Source:MGI Symbol;Acc:MGI:1096867]) HSP 1 Score: 130.183 bits (326), Expect = 2.018e-32 Identity = 69/100 (69.00%), Postives = 79/100 (79.00%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 629 RGNPQLWQFXXXXXXXXXXXXVICWTGRDKEFKLIEPEEVARLWGAQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYDKNIMQKVPGERYVYKFTDNCLPDNIL-VSSPNN 925 RG+ QLWQFL++LL D ++ I WTGR EFKLIEPEEVAR WG QKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYY+K IMQKV GERYVYKF C PD + ++ P+N Sbjct: 383 RGSLQLWQFLVTLLDDPANAHFIAWTGRGMEFKLIEPEEVARRWGIQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYEKGIMQKVAGERYVYKFV--CDPDALFSMAFPDN 480
BLAST of ETS variant 4 vs. UniProt/SwissProt
Match: sp|P28322|ETV4_MOUSE (ETS translocation variant 4 OS=Mus musculus OX=10090 GN=Etv4 PE=2 SV=2) HSP 1 Score: 132.494 bits (332), Expect = 1.261e-32 Identity = 71/112 (63.39%), Postives = 81/112 (72.32%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 629 RGNPQLWQFXXXXXXXXXXXXVICWTGRDKEFKLIEPEEVARLWGAQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYDKNIMQKVPGERYVYKFTDNCLPDNIL-VSSPNNSGMDLSMNLIHP 961 RG QLWQFL++LL D ++ I WTGR EFKLIEPEEVARLWG QKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYY+K IMQKV GERYVYKF C P+ + ++ P+N L P Sbjct: 339 RGALQLWQFLVALLDDPTNAHFIAWTGRGMEFKLIEPEEVARLWGIQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYEKGIMQKVAGERYVYKFV--CEPEALFSLAFPDNQRPALKAEFDRP 448
BLAST of ETS variant 4 vs. UniProt/SwissProt
Match: sp|P43268|ETV4_HUMAN (ETS translocation variant 4 OS=Homo sapiens OX=9606 GN=ETV4 PE=1 SV=3) HSP 1 Score: 132.494 bits (332), Expect = 1.309e-32 Identity = 71/112 (63.39%), Postives = 81/112 (72.32%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 629 RGNPQLWQFXXXXXXXXXXXXVICWTGRDKEFKLIEPEEVARLWGAQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYDKNIMQKVPGERYVYKFTDNCLPDNIL-VSSPNNSGMDLSMNLIHP 961 RG QLWQFL++LL D ++ I WTGR EFKLIEPEEVARLWG QKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYY+K IMQKV GERYVYKF C P+ + ++ P+N L P Sbjct: 338 RGALQLWQFLVALLDDPTNAHFIAWTGRGMEFKLIEPEEVARLWGIQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYEKGIMQKVAGERYVYKFV--CEPEALFSLAFPDNQRPALKAEFDRP 447
BLAST of ETS variant 4 vs. UniProt/SwissProt
Match: sp|Q9PUQ1|ETV4_DANRE (ETS translocation variant 4 OS=Danio rerio OX=7955 GN=etv4 PE=1 SV=2) HSP 1 Score: 131.339 bits (329), Expect = 3.564e-32 Identity = 69/109 (63.30%), Postives = 82/109 (75.23%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 629 RGNPQLWQFXXXXXXXXXXXXVICWTGRDKEFKLIEPEEVARLWGAQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYDKNIMQKVPGERYVYKFTDNCLPDNIL-VSSPNNSGMDLSMNL 952 RG+ QLWQFL++LL D ++ I WTGR EFKLIEPEEVARLWG +KNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYY+K IMQKV GERYVYKF C P+ ++ ++ P+N L Sbjct: 347 RGSLQLWQFLVALLDDPSNAHFIAWTGRGMEFKLIEPEEVARLWGIEKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYEKGIMQKVAGERYVYKFV--CEPEALITLAFPDNQRPSLKAEF 453
BLAST of ETS variant 4 vs. UniProt/SwissProt
Match: sp|Q9CXC9|ETV5_MOUSE (ETS translocation variant 5 OS=Mus musculus OX=10090 GN=Etv5 PE=2 SV=1) HSP 1 Score: 129.798 bits (325), Expect = 1.438e-31 Identity = 69/100 (69.00%), Postives = 79/100 (79.00%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 629 RGNPQLWQFXXXXXXXXXXXXVICWTGRDKEFKLIEPEEVARLWGAQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYDKNIMQKVPGERYVYKFTDNCLPDNIL-VSSPNN 925 RG+ QLWQFL++LL D ++ I WTGR EFKLIEPEEVAR WG QKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYY+K IMQKV GERYVYKF C PD + ++ P+N Sbjct: 365 RGSLQLWQFLVTLLDDPANAHFIAWTGRGMEFKLIEPEEVARRWGIQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYEKGIMQKVAGERYVYKFV--CDPDALFSMAFPDN 462
BLAST of ETS variant 4 vs. UniProt/SwissProt
Match: sp|P41161|ETV5_HUMAN (ETS translocation variant 5 OS=Homo sapiens OX=9606 GN=ETV5 PE=1 SV=1) HSP 1 Score: 129.798 bits (325), Expect = 1.601e-31 Identity = 69/100 (69.00%), Postives = 79/100 (79.00%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 629 RGNPQLWQFXXXXXXXXXXXXVICWTGRDKEFKLIEPEEVARLWGAQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYDKNIMQKVPGERYVYKFTDNCLPDNIL-VSSPNN 925 RG+ QLWQFL++LL D ++ I WTGR EFKLIEPEEVAR WG QKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYY+K IMQKV GERYVYKF C PD + ++ P+N Sbjct: 365 RGSLQLWQFLVTLLDDPANAHFIAWTGRGMEFKLIEPEEVARRWGIQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYEKGIMQKVAGERYVYKFV--CDPDALFSMAFPDN 462
BLAST of ETS variant 4 vs. TrEMBL
Match: M1ELA5 (Ets variant 4 (Fragment) OS=Mustela putorius furo OX=9669 PE=2 SV=1) HSP 1 Score: 131.339 bits (329), Expect = 8.253e-33 Identity = 71/112 (63.39%), Postives = 81/112 (72.32%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 629 RGNPQLWQFXXXXXXXXXXXXVICWTGRDKEFKLIEPEEVARLWGAQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYDKNIMQKVPGERYVYKFTDNCLPDNIL-VSSPNNSGMDLSMNLIHP 961 RG QLWQFL++LL D ++ I WTGR EFKLIEPEEVARLWG QKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYY+K IMQKV GERYVYKF C P+ + ++ P+N L P Sbjct: 10 RGALQLWQFLVALLDDPTNAHFIAWTGRGMEFKLIEPEEVARLWGIQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYEKGIMQKVAGERYVYKFV--CEPEALFSLAFPDNQRPALKAEFDRP 119
BLAST of ETS variant 4 vs. TrEMBL
Match: R7TDT0 (ETS domain-containing protein (Fragment) OS=Capitella teleta OX=283909 GN=CAPTEDRAFT_46009 PE=3 SV=1) HSP 1 Score: 129.798 bits (325), Expect = 1.073e-32 Identity = 70/100 (70.00%), Postives = 78/100 (78.00%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 629 RGNPQLWQFXXXXXXXXXXXXVICWTGRDKEFKLIEPEEVARLWGAQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYDKNIMQKVPGERYVYKFTDNCLPDNILVSS-PNN 925 RG+ QLWQFL++LL D +S I WTGR EFKLIEPEEVAR WG QKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYY+K IMQKV GERYVYKF C PD + + P+N Sbjct: 6 RGSLQLWQFLVALLDDPCNSSFIAWTGRGLEFKLIEPEEVARRWGIQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYEKGIMQKVAGERYVYKFV--CDPDALFTMAFPDN 103
BLAST of ETS variant 4 vs. TrEMBL
Match: A0A0P7W6W4 (ETS domain-containing protein OS=Scleropages formosus OX=113540 GN=Z043_123746 PE=3 SV=1) HSP 1 Score: 132.88 bits (333), Expect = 1.176e-32 Identity = 69/100 (69.00%), Postives = 81/100 (81.00%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 629 RGNPQLWQFXXXXXXXXXXXXVICWTGRDKEFKLIEPEEVARLWGAQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYDKNIMQKVPGERYVYKFTDNCLPDNIL-VSSPNN 925 RG+ QLWQFL++LL D ++ I WTGR EFKLIEPEEVARLWG QKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYY+K IMQKV GERYVYKF C P+ ++ ++ P+N Sbjct: 67 RGSLQLWQFLVALLDDPGNAHFIAWTGRGMEFKLIEPEEVARLWGMQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYEKGIMQKVAGERYVYKFV--CEPEALISLAFPDN 164
BLAST of ETS variant 4 vs. TrEMBL
Match: A0A402EAU5 (ETS domain-containing protein (Fragment) OS=Paroedura picta OX=143630 GN=parPi_0027853 PE=3 SV=1) HSP 1 Score: 130.568 bits (327), Expect = 2.287e-32 Identity = 70/100 (70.00%), Postives = 80/100 (80.00%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 629 RGNPQLWQFXXXXXXXXXXXXVICWTGRDKEFKLIEPEEVARLWGAQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYDKNIMQKVPGERYVYKFTDNCLPDNIL-VSSPNN 925 RG+ QLWQFL++LL D +S I WTGR EFKLIEPEEVARLWG QKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYY+K IMQKV GERYVYKF C P+ + ++ P+N Sbjct: 24 RGSLQLWQFLVALLDDPSNSHFISWTGRGMEFKLIEPEEVARLWGIQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYEKGIMQKVAGERYVYKFV--CEPEALFSLAFPDN 121
BLAST of ETS variant 4 vs. TrEMBL
Match: A0A5N4D3C5 (ETS translocation variant 4 OS=Camelus dromedarius OX=9838 GN=Cadr_000019545 PE=4 SV=1) HSP 1 Score: 131.724 bits (330), Expect = 2.733e-32 Identity = 71/112 (63.39%), Postives = 81/112 (72.32%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 629 RGNPQLWQFXXXXXXXXXXXXVICWTGRDKEFKLIEPEEVARLWGAQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYDKNIMQKVPGERYVYKFTDNCLPDNIL-VSSPNNSGMDLSMNLIHP 961 RG QLWQFL++LL D ++ I WTGR EFKLIEPEEVARLWG QKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYY+K IMQKV GERYVYKF C P+ + ++ P+N L P Sbjct: 61 RGALQLWQFLVALLDDPTNAHFIAWTGRGMEFKLIEPEEVARLWGIQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYEKGIMQKVAGERYVYKFV--CEPEALFSLAFPDNQRPALKAEFDRP 170
BLAST of ETS variant 4 vs. Ensembl Cavefish
Match: etv4 (ETS variant transcription factor 4 [Source:NCBI gene;Acc:103042838]) HSP 1 Score: 132.109 bits (331), Expect = 2.291e-33 Identity = 70/109 (64.22%), Postives = 82/109 (75.23%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 629 RGNPQLWQFXXXXXXXXXXXXVICWTGRDKEFKLIEPEEVARLWGAQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYDKNIMQKVPGERYVYKFTDNCLPDNIL-VSSPNNSGMDLSMNL 952 RG+ QLWQFL++LL D ++ I WTGR EFKLIEPEEVARLWG QKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYY+K IMQKV GERYVYKF C P+ ++ ++ P+N L Sbjct: 355 RGSLQLWQFLVALLDDPGNAHFIAWTGRGMEFKLIEPEEVARLWGMQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYEKGIMQKVAGERYVYKFV--CEPEALISLAFPDNQRPSLKAEF 461
BLAST of ETS variant 4 vs. Ensembl Cavefish
Match: etv4 (ETS variant transcription factor 4 [Source:NCBI gene;Acc:103042838]) HSP 1 Score: 132.109 bits (331), Expect = 2.774e-33 Identity = 70/109 (64.22%), Postives = 82/109 (75.23%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 629 RGNPQLWQFXXXXXXXXXXXXVICWTGRDKEFKLIEPEEVARLWGAQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYDKNIMQKVPGERYVYKFTDNCLPDNIL-VSSPNNSGMDLSMNL 952 RG+ QLWQFL++LL D ++ I WTGR EFKLIEPEEVARLWG QKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYY+K IMQKV GERYVYKF C P+ ++ ++ P+N L Sbjct: 373 RGSLQLWQFLVALLDDPGNAHFIAWTGRGMEFKLIEPEEVARLWGMQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYEKGIMQKVAGERYVYKFV--CEPEALISLAFPDNQRPSLKAEF 479
BLAST of ETS variant 4 vs. Ensembl Cavefish
Match: etv1 (ETS variant transcription factor 1 [Source:NCBI gene;Acc:103024366]) HSP 1 Score: 130.183 bits (326), Expect = 5.480e-33 Identity = 76/134 (56.72%), Postives = 92/134 (68.66%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 629 RGNPQLWQFXXXXXXXXXXXXVICWTGRDKEFKLIEPEEVARLWGAQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYDKNIMQKVPGERYVYKFTDNCLPDNIL-VSSPNNSGMDLSMNLIHPDMINYTICYPIQNSNEFHSSVQ 1027 RG+ QLWQFL++LL D +S I WTGR EFKLIEPEEVAR WG QKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYY+K IMQKV GERYVYKF C P+ + ++ P+N L ++ IN P+ + +E + VQ Sbjct: 287 RGSLQLWQFLVALLDDPSNSHFIAWTGRGMEFKLIEPEEVARRWGIQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYEKGIMQKVAGERYVYKFV--CDPEALFSMAFPDNQRPVLKTDMER--QINEEDTVPLSHFDESVAYVQ 416
BLAST of ETS variant 4 vs. Ensembl Cavefish
Match: etv1 (ETS variant transcription factor 1 [Source:NCBI gene;Acc:103024366]) HSP 1 Score: 130.183 bits (326), Expect = 7.841e-33 Identity = 76/134 (56.72%), Postives = 92/134 (68.66%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 629 RGNPQLWQFXXXXXXXXXXXXVICWTGRDKEFKLIEPEEVARLWGAQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYDKNIMQKVPGERYVYKFTDNCLPDNIL-VSSPNNSGMDLSMNLIHPDMINYTICYPIQNSNEFHSSVQ 1027 RG+ QLWQFL++LL D +S I WTGR EFKLIEPEEVAR WG QKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYY+K IMQKV GERYVYKF C P+ + ++ P+N L ++ IN P+ + +E + VQ Sbjct: 331 RGSLQLWQFLVALLDDPSNSHFIAWTGRGMEFKLIEPEEVARRWGIQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYEKGIMQKVAGERYVYKFV--CDPEALFSMAFPDNQRPVLKTDMER--QINEEDTVPLSHFDESVAYVQ 460
BLAST of ETS variant 4 vs. Ensembl Cavefish
Match: etv1 (ETS variant transcription factor 1 [Source:NCBI gene;Acc:103024366]) HSP 1 Score: 129.413 bits (324), Expect = 8.415e-33 Identity = 76/134 (56.72%), Postives = 92/134 (68.66%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 629 RGNPQLWQFXXXXXXXXXXXXVICWTGRDKEFKLIEPEEVARLWGAQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYDKNIMQKVPGERYVYKFTDNCLPDNIL-VSSPNNSGMDLSMNLIHPDMINYTICYPIQNSNEFHSSVQ 1027 RG+ QLWQFL++LL D +S I WTGR EFKLIEPEEVAR WG QKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYY+K IMQKV GERYVYKF C P+ + ++ P+N L ++ IN P+ + +E + VQ Sbjct: 292 RGSLQLWQFLVALLDDPSNSHFIAWTGRGMEFKLIEPEEVARRWGIQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYEKGIMQKVAGERYVYKFV--CDPEALFSMAFPDNQRPVLKTDMER--QINEEDTVPLSHFDESVAYVQ 421
BLAST of ETS variant 4 vs. Ensembl Sea Lamprey
Match: etv1 (ETS variant transcription factor 1 [Source:ZFIN;Acc:ZDB-GENE-070104-1]) HSP 1 Score: 127.102 bits (318), Expect = 1.141e-33 Identity = 68/109 (62.39%), Postives = 82/109 (75.23%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 629 RGNPQLWQFXXXXXXXXXXXXVICWTGRDKEFKLIEPEEVARLWGAQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYDKNIMQKVPGERYVYKFTDNCLPDNIL-VSSPNNSGMDLSMNL 952 RG+ QLWQFL++LL D + +I WTGR EFKL+EPEEVAR WG QKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYY+K IMQKV GERYVYKF C P+ + ++ P+N L ++ Sbjct: 162 RGSLQLWQFLVALLDDPANGHLITWTGRGMEFKLLEPEEVARKWGVQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYEKGIMQKVAGERYVYKFV--CDPEALFSLAFPDNQRPLLKADI 268
BLAST of ETS variant 4 vs. Ensembl Sea Lamprey
Match: ENSPMAT00000002472.1 (pep scaffold:Pmarinus_7.0:GL476893:38150:62026:-1 gene:ENSPMAG00000002241.1 transcript:ENSPMAT00000002472.1 gene_biotype:protein_coding transcript_biotype:protein_coding) HSP 1 Score: 129.798 bits (325), Expect = 1.985e-33 Identity = 66/93 (70.97%), Postives = 75/93 (80.65%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 629 RGNPQLWQFXXXXXXXXXXXXVICWTGRDKEFKLIEPEEVARLWGAQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYDKNIMQKVPGERYVYKFTDNCLPDNIL 907 RG+ QLWQFL++LL D H+ I WTGR EFKL++PEEVARLWG QKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYY+K IMQKV GERYVYKF C P+ + Sbjct: 374 RGSLQLWQFLVALLEDPAHAGTIVWTGRGMEFKLLDPEEVARLWGIQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYEKGIMQKVAGERYVYKFV--CHPEVVF 464
BLAST of ETS variant 4 vs. Ensembl Sea Lamprey
Match: ENSPMAT00000006723.1 (pep scaffold:Pmarinus_7.0:GL483008:681:12314:1 gene:ENSPMAG00000006043.1 transcript:ENSPMAT00000006723.1 gene_biotype:protein_coding transcript_biotype:protein_coding) HSP 1 Score: 127.872 bits (320), Expect = 1.571e-32 Identity = 65/93 (69.89%), Postives = 75/93 (80.65%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 629 RGNPQLWQFXXXXXXXXXXXXVICWTGRDKEFKLIEPEEVARLWGAQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYDKNIMQKVPGERYVYKFTDNCLPDNIL 907 RG+ QLWQFL++LL D H+ I WTGR EFKL++PEEVARLWG QKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYY+K IMQKV GERYVY+F C P+ + Sbjct: 368 RGSLQLWQFLVALLEDPVHAGTIVWTGRGMEFKLLDPEEVARLWGIQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYEKGIMQKVAGERYVYRFV--CDPEVVF 458
BLAST of ETS variant 4 vs. Ensembl Sea Lamprey
Match: fli1a (Fli-1 proto-oncogene, ETS transcription factor a [Source:ZFIN;Acc:ZDB-GENE-980526-426]) HSP 1 Score: 104.375 bits (259), Expect = 2.856e-26 Identity = 53/82 (64.63%), Postives = 64/82 (78.05%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 632 GNPQLWQFXXXXXXXXXXXXVICWTGRDKEFKLIEPEEVARLWGAQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYDKNIMQKVPGERYVYKF 877 G QLWQFLL LL DS ++ I W G + EFK+ +P+EVAR WG +K++P MNYDKLSR+LRYYYDKNIM KV G+RY YKF Sbjct: 32 GQIQLWQFLLELLSDSSNANCITWEGTNGEFKMTDPDEVARRWGERKSKPNMNYDKLSRALRYYYDKNIMTKVHGKRYAYKF 113
BLAST of ETS variant 4 vs. Ensembl Sea Lamprey
Match: fev (FEV transcription factor, ETS family member [Source:NCBI gene;Acc:791175]) HSP 1 Score: 103.99 bits (258), Expect = 3.032e-26 Identity = 52/82 (63.41%), Postives = 62/82 (75.61%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 632 GNPQLWQFXXXXXXXXXXXXVICWTGRDKEFKLIEPEEVARLWGAQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYDKNIMQKVPGERYVYKF 877 G QLWQFLL LL D+ ++ I W G EFKL +P+EVAR WG +K +P MNYDKLSR+LRYYYDKNIM KV G+RY Y+F Sbjct: 4 GQIQLWQFLLELLSDAANAHCIAWEGACGEFKLTDPDEVARQWGKRKAKPNMNYDKLSRALRYYYDKNIMSKVHGKRYAYRF 85
BLAST of ETS variant 4 vs. Ensembl Nematostella
Match: EDO37550 (Predicted protein [Source:UniProtKB/TrEMBL;Acc:A7SFF5]) HSP 1 Score: 125.946 bits (315), Expect = 3.316e-35 Identity = 65/93 (69.89%), Postives = 73/93 (78.49%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 629 RGNPQLWQFXXXXXXXXXXXXVICWTGRDKEFKLIEPEEVARLWGAQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYDKNIMQKVPGERYVYKFTDNCLPDNIL 907 RG+ QLWQFL++LL + S I WTGR EFKLI+PEEVAR WG QKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYY+K IMQKV GERYVYKF C P+ + Sbjct: 4 RGSLQLWQFLVALLDEPECSSFIAWTGRGLEFKLIDPEEVARRWGLQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYEKGIMQKVAGERYVYKFV--CSPEALF 94
BLAST of ETS variant 4 vs. Ensembl Nematostella
Match: EDO39973 (Predicted protein [Source:UniProtKB/TrEMBL;Acc:A7S8F6]) HSP 1 Score: 104.76 bits (260), Expect = 2.435e-27 Identity = 52/82 (63.41%), Postives = 65/82 (79.27%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 632 GNPQLWQFXXXXXXXXXXXXVICWTGRDKEFKLIEPEEVARLWGAQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYDKNIMQKVPGERYVYKF 877 G QLWQFLL LL D +++ I W G + EFKL++P+EVAR WG +KN+P MNYDKLSR+LRYYYDKNIM K+ G+RY YK+ Sbjct: 13 GQIQLWQFLLELLSDPKNANCIAWEGTNGEFKLVDPDEVARRWGERKNKPNMNYDKLSRALRYYYDKNIMTKIHGKRYAYKY 94
BLAST of ETS variant 4 vs. Ensembl Nematostella
Match: EDO43493 (Predicted protein [Source:UniProtKB/TrEMBL;Acc:A7RYB7]) HSP 1 Score: 103.219 bits (256), Expect = 1.116e-26 Identity = 49/82 (59.76%), Postives = 63/82 (76.83%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 641 QLWQFXXXXXXXXXXXXVICWTGRDKEFKLIEPEEVARLWGAQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYDKNIMQKVPGERYVYKFTDN 886 QLWQFLL LL D +I W G + EFKL +PE+VA+ WG +KN+PAMNY+KLSR+LRYYYD +++ KV G+R+VYKF N Sbjct: 2 QLWQFLLELLTDKTCRHLIMWVGEEGEFKLNDPEQVAQQWGKRKNKPAMNYEKLSRALRYYYDGDMIHKVHGKRFVYKFVCN 83
BLAST of ETS variant 4 vs. Ensembl Nematostella
Match: EDO44339 (Predicted protein [Source:UniProtKB/TrEMBL;Acc:A7RW27]) HSP 1 Score: 93.2041 bits (230), Expect = 1.825e-23 Identity = 51/82 (62.20%), Postives = 62/82 (75.61%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 641 QLWQFXXXXXXXXXXXXVICWTGRDK-EFKLIEPEEVARLWGAQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYDKNIMQKVPGERYVYKFTD 883 LW+FLL LL D R+S +I WT R+ EFKL+ EEVAR WG K+RP MNYDKLSR+LRYYY K I++KV G+R VYKF + Sbjct: 4 HLWEFLLDLLADGRYSSIISWTNRESGEFKLLNQEEVARRWGHLKHRPGMNYDKLSRALRYYYQKGIIKKVHGQRLVYKFCN 85
BLAST of ETS variant 4 vs. Ensembl Nematostella
Match: EDO45310 (Predicted protein [Source:UniProtKB/TrEMBL;Acc:A7RSZ6]) HSP 1 Score: 92.0485 bits (227), Expect = 4.989e-23 Identity = 49/82 (59.76%), Postives = 60/82 (73.17%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 641 QLWQFXXXXXXXXXXXXVICWTGRDK-EFKLIEPEEVARLWGAQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYDKNIMQKVPGERYVYKFTD 883 LW+FLL LL D + +I WT +++ EFKL EEVAR WG K RP MNYDKLSR+LRYYY KNI++KV G+R VYKF + Sbjct: 4 HLWEFLLELLADESCASMISWTKKEEGEFKLRNQEEVARRWGDLKQRPGMNYDKLSRALRYYYQKNIIKKVNGQRLVYKFVE 85
BLAST of ETS variant 4 vs. Ensembl Medaka
Match: etv4 (ETS variant transcription factor 4 [Source:NCBI gene;Acc:101173984]) HSP 1 Score: 132.109 bits (331), Expect = 2.524e-33 Identity = 70/109 (64.22%), Postives = 82/109 (75.23%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 629 RGNPQLWQFXXXXXXXXXXXXVICWTGRDKEFKLIEPEEVARLWGAQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYDKNIMQKVPGERYVYKFTDNCLPDNIL-VSSPNNSGMDLSMNL 952 RG+ QLWQFL++LL D ++ I WTGR EFKLIEPEEVARLWG QKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYY+K IMQKV GERYVYKF C P+ ++ ++ P+N L Sbjct: 372 RGSLQLWQFLVALLDDPGNAHFIAWTGRGMEFKLIEPEEVARLWGMQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYEKGIMQKVAGERYVYKFV--CEPEALISMAFPDNQRPSLKAEF 478
BLAST of ETS variant 4 vs. Ensembl Medaka
Match: etv1 (ETS variant transcription factor 1 [Source:NCBI gene;Acc:101169639]) HSP 1 Score: 129.413 bits (324), Expect = 3.661e-33 Identity = 79/145 (54.48%), Postives = 95/145 (65.52%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 629 RGNPQLWQFXXXXXXXXXXXXVICWTGRDKEFKLIEPEEVARLWGAQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYDKNIMQKVPGERYVYKFTDNCLPDNIL-VSSPNNSGMDLSMNLIHPDMINYTICYPIQNSNEFHSSVQHDQISQYLCYS 1060 RG+ QLWQFL++LL D +S I WTGR EFKLIEPEEVAR WG QKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYY+K IMQKV GERYVYKF C P+ + ++ P+N L ++ IN P+ + +E + VQ Q YS Sbjct: 229 RGSLQLWQFLVALLDDPSNSHFIAWTGRGMEFKLIEPEEVARRWGIQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYEKGIMQKVAGERYVYKFV--CDPEALFSMAFPDNQRPVLKTDVER--QINEEDTVPLSHFDENMAYVQEGPYCQPHPYS 369
BLAST of ETS variant 4 vs. Ensembl Medaka
Match: etv1 (ETS variant transcription factor 1 [Source:NCBI gene;Acc:101169639]) HSP 1 Score: 129.798 bits (325), Expect = 7.096e-33 Identity = 79/145 (54.48%), Postives = 95/145 (65.52%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 629 RGNPQLWQFXXXXXXXXXXXXVICWTGRDKEFKLIEPEEVARLWGAQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYDKNIMQKVPGERYVYKFTDNCLPDNIL-VSSPNNSGMDLSMNLIHPDMINYTICYPIQNSNEFHSSVQHDQISQYLCYS 1060 RG+ QLWQFL++LL D +S I WTGR EFKLIEPEEVAR WG QKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYY+K IMQKV GERYVYKF C P+ + ++ P+N L ++ IN P+ + +E + VQ Q YS Sbjct: 293 RGSLQLWQFLVALLDDPSNSHFIAWTGRGMEFKLIEPEEVARRWGIQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYEKGIMQKVAGERYVYKFV--CDPEALFSMAFPDNQRPVLKTDVER--QINEEDTVPLSHFDENMAYVQEGPYCQPHPYS 433
BLAST of ETS variant 4 vs. Ensembl Medaka
Match: etv5a (ETS translocation variant 5 [Source:NCBI gene;Acc:101165293]) HSP 1 Score: 129.413 bits (324), Expect = 2.206e-32 Identity = 69/108 (63.89%), Postives = 82/108 (75.93%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 629 RGNPQLWQFXXXXXXXXXXXXVICWTGRDKEFKLIEPEEVARLWGAQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYDKNIMQKVPGERYVYKFTDNCLPDNIL-VSSPNNSGMDLSMN 949 RG+ QLWQFL++LL D ++ I WTGR EFKLIEPEEVAR WG QKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYY+K IMQKV GERYVYKF C P+ + ++ P+N L ++ Sbjct: 357 RGSLQLWQFLVTLLDDPANAYFIAWTGRGMEFKLIEPEEVARRWGIQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYEKGIMQKVAGERYVYKFV--CDPEALFSMAFPDNQRPSLKVD 462
BLAST of ETS variant 4 vs. Ensembl Medaka
Match: ENSORLT00000028958.1 (ETS translocation variant 5-like [Source:NCBI gene;Acc:101164024]) HSP 1 Score: 126.331 bits (316), Expect = 1.778e-31 Identity = 65/93 (69.89%), Postives = 76/93 (81.72%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 629 RGNPQLWQFXXXXXXXXXXXXVICWTGRDKEFKLIEPEEVARLWGAQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYDKNIMQKVPGERYVYKFTDNCLPDNIL 907 RG+ QLWQFLL+LL + ++ +I WTGR+ EFKL +PEEVARLWG QKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYY+K IMQKV GERYVYKF C P+ + Sbjct: 320 RGSLQLWQFLLTLLDNPGNAHLIVWTGRNMEFKLNDPEEVARLWGVQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYEKGIMQKVAGERYVYKFV--CNPEALF 410
BLAST of ETS variant 4 vs. Planmine SMEST
Match: SMESG000008885.1 (SMESG000008885.1) HSP 1 Score: 634.795 bits (1636), Expect = 0.000e+0 Identity = 392/392 (100.00%), Postives = 392/392 (100.00%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 83 MNLNTGGNLDSQLPDVPDLYLRQSLPYSGDVEGFCQSTINLCGIGGGDFHGQISGRPESLVRLDSRFNYGECNLTREIFPGTYENNNGLMTSVSQAXXXXXXXXXXXXYITSDNSGNEDLTYLXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXQFSCEESSPPYIPDSNYXXXXXXXXXXXXXXACNNNSKGLAERGNPQLWQFXXXXXXXXXXXXVICWTGRDKEFKLIEPEEVARLWGAQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYDKNIMQKVPGERYVYKFTDNCLPDNILVSSPNNSGMDLSMNLIHPDMINYTICYPIQNSNEFHSSVQHDQISQYLCYSPEHIQSSFTGMQTYSHQSLKSPALTCDYINNRESIXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXSENYLKIESTTSI 1258 MNLNTGGNLDSQLPDVPDLYLRQSLPYSGDVEGFCQSTINLCGIGGGDFHGQISGRPESLVRLDSRFNYGECNLTREIFPGTYENNNGLMTSVSQAVSLSMVNSNNVSYITSDNSGNEDLTYLSNNIEYSSLINNSNNNIQFSCEESSPPYIPDSNYNPNSRNNLLGSNSRACNNNSKGLAERGNPQLWQFLLSLLHDSRHSRVICWTGRDKEFKLIEPEEVARLWGAQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYDKNIMQKVPGERYVYKFTDNCLPDNILVSSPNNSGMDLSMNLIHPDMINYTICYPIQNSNEFHSSVQHDQISQYLCYSPEHIQSSFTGMQTYSHQSLKSPALTCDYINNRESILLPQFPPQLNRPPNPLNNSENYLKIESTTSI Sbjct: 1 MNLNTGGNLDSQLPDVPDLYLRQSLPYSGDVEGFCQSTINLCGIGGGDFHGQISGRPESLVRLDSRFNYGECNLTREIFPGTYENNNGLMTSVSQAVSLSMVNSNNVSYITSDNSGNEDLTYLSNNIEYSSLINNSNNNIQFSCEESSPPYIPDSNYNPNSRNNLLGSNSRACNNNSKGLAERGNPQLWQFLLSLLHDSRHSRVICWTGRDKEFKLIEPEEVARLWGAQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYDKNIMQKVPGERYVYKFTDNCLPDNILVSSPNNSGMDLSMNLIHPDMINYTICYPIQNSNEFHSSVQHDQISQYLCYSPEHIQSSFTGMQTYSHQSLKSPALTCDYINNRESILLPQFPPQLNRPPNPLNNSENYLKIESTTSI 392
BLAST of ETS variant 4 vs. Planmine SMEST
Match: SMESG000033317.1 (SMESG000033317.1) HSP 1 Score: 124.02 bits (310), Expect = 7.686e-31 Identity = 62/95 (65.26%), Postives = 76/95 (80.00%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 623 AERGNPQLWQFXXXXXXXXXXXXVICWTGRDKEFKLIEPEEVARLWGAQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYDKNIMQKVPGERYVYKFTDNCLPDNIL 907 +++ + QLWQFL SLL + ++ +I WTG+ EFKLI+PEEVA+LWG QKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYY+K IMQKV GERY+YKF C P +L Sbjct: 144 SQKRSLQLWQFLKSLLDNHKNIHIITWTGKSLEFKLIDPEEVAKLWGLQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYEKGIMQKVAGERYMYKFI--CDPSVLL 236
BLAST of ETS variant 4 vs. Planmine SMEST
Match: SMESG000078333.1 (SMESG000078333.1) HSP 1 Score: 114.39 bits (285), Expect = 4.965e-28 Identity = 64/115 (55.65%), Postives = 77/115 (66.96%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 632 GNPQLWQFXXXXXXXXXXXXVICWTGRDKEFKLIEPEEVARLWGAQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYDKNIMQKVPGERYVYKFTDNCLPDNILVSSPNNSGMDLSMNLIHPDMINY 976 G QLWQFLL LL DSR++ I W G + EFKLI+P+EVAR WG +K++P MNYDKLSR+LRYYYDKNIM KV G+RY YKF L + +SP SG S P + Y Sbjct: 76 GQIQLWQFLLELLSDSRNTTFITWEGTNGEFKLIDPDEVARRWGERKSKPNMNYDKLSRALRYYYDKNIMTKVHGKRYAYKFDFAGLAQAMQPASPTVSGPGASPTSFEPSIYKY 190
BLAST of ETS variant 4 vs. Planmine SMEST
Match: SMESG000078333.1 (SMESG000078333.1) HSP 1 Score: 114.39 bits (285), Expect = 5.256e-28 Identity = 64/115 (55.65%), Postives = 77/115 (66.96%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 632 GNPQLWQFXXXXXXXXXXXXVICWTGRDKEFKLIEPEEVARLWGAQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYDKNIMQKVPGERYVYKFTDNCLPDNILVSSPNNSGMDLSMNLIHPDMINY 976 G QLWQFLL LL DSR++ I W G + EFKLI+P+EVAR WG +K++P MNYDKLSR+LRYYYDKNIM KV G+RY YKF L + +SP SG S P + Y Sbjct: 79 GQIQLWQFLLELLSDSRNTTFITWEGTNGEFKLIDPDEVARRWGERKSKPNMNYDKLSRALRYYYDKNIMTKVHGKRYAYKFDFAGLAQAMQPASPTVSGPGASPTSFEPSIYKY 193
BLAST of ETS variant 4 vs. Planmine SMEST
Match: SMESG000036336.1 (SMESG000036336.1) HSP 1 Score: 108.612 bits (270), Expect = 1.463e-26 Identity = 57/82 (69.51%), Postives = 66/82 (80.49%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 632 GNPQLWQFXXXXXXXXXXXXVICWTGRDKEFKLIEPEEVARLWGAQKNRPAMNYDKLSRSLRYYYDKNIMQKVPGERYVYKF 877 G QLWQFLL LL DSR+S I W G + EFKLI+P+EVAR WG +K++P MNYDKLSR+LRYYYDKNIM KV G+RY YKF Sbjct: 54 GQIQLWQFLLELLADSRNSGFISWEGNNGEFKLIDPDEVARRWGERKSKPNMNYDKLSRALRYYYDKNIMTKVHGKRYAYKF 135 The following BLAST results are available for this feature:
BLAST of ETS variant 4 vs. Ensembl Human
Analysis Date: 2016-08-08 (Schmidtea mediterranea smed_20140614 BLASTX Human e!99) Total hits: 5
BLAST of ETS variant 4 vs. Ensembl Celegans
Analysis Date: 2020-05-01 (Schmidtea mediterranea smed_20140614 BLASTX Celegan e!99) Total hits: 5
BLAST of ETS variant 4 vs. Ensembl Fly
Analysis Date: 2020-05-01 (Schmidtea mediterranea smed_20140614 BLASTX Drosophila e!99) Total hits: 5
BLAST of ETS variant 4 vs. Ensembl Zebrafish
Analysis Date: 2016-08-08 (Schmidtea mediterranea smed_20140614 BLASTX Zebrafish e!99) Total hits: 5
BLAST of ETS variant 4 vs. Ensembl Xenopus
Analysis Date: 2020-05-01 (Schmidtea mediterranea smed_20140614 BLASTX Xenopus e!99) Total hits: 5
BLAST of ETS variant 4 vs. Ensembl Mouse
Analysis Date: 2020-05-01 (Schmidtea mediterranea smed_20140614 BLASTX Mouse e!99) Total hits: 5
BLAST of ETS variant 4 vs. UniProt/SwissProt
Analysis Date: 2020-05-01 (Schmidtea mediterranea smed_20140614 BLASTX EMBL-EBI UniProt) Total hits: 5
BLAST of ETS variant 4 vs. TrEMBL
Analysis Date: 2020-05-01 (Schmidtea mediterranea smed_20140614 BLASTX EMBL-EBI TrEMBL) Total hits: 5
BLAST of ETS variant 4 vs. Ensembl Cavefish
Analysis Date: 2020-05-08 (Schmidtea mediterranea smed_20140614 BLASTX Cavefish e!99) Total hits: 5
BLAST of ETS variant 4 vs. Ensembl Sea Lamprey
Analysis Date: 2020-05-08 (Schmidtea mediterranea smed_20140614 BLASTX Sea Lamprey e!99) Total hits: 5
BLAST of ETS variant 4 vs. Ensembl Yeast
Analysis Date: 2020-05-08 (Schmidtea mediterranea smed_20140614 BLASTX Yeast e!Fungi46) Total hits: 0
BLAST of ETS variant 4 vs. Ensembl Nematostella
Analysis Date: 2020-05-08 (Schmidtea mediterranea smed_20140614 BLASTX Nematostella e!Metazoa46) Total hits: 5
BLAST of ETS variant 4 vs. Ensembl Medaka
Analysis Date: 2020-05-08 (Schmidtea mediterranea smed_20140614 BLASTX Medaka e!99) Total hits: 5
BLAST of ETS variant 4 vs. Planmine SMEST
Analysis Date: 2020-05-08 (Schmidtea mediterranea smed_20140614 BLASTX Planmine SMEST) Total hits: 5
Analyses
This transcript is derived from or has results from the following analyses Sequences
The following sequences are available for this feature:
transcript sequence >SMED30032308 ID=SMED30032308|Name=ETS variant 4|organism=Schmidtea mediterranea sexual|type=transcript|length=1337bpback to top protein sequence of SMED30032308-orf-1 >SMED30032308-orf-1 ID=SMED30032308-orf-1|Name=SMED30032308-orf-1|organism=Schmidtea mediterranea sexual|type=polypeptide|length=393bp MNLNTGGNLDSQLPDVPDLYLRQSLPYSGDVEGFCQSTINLCGIGGGDFHback to top Annotated Terms
The following terms have been associated with this transcript:
InterPro
Analysis Name: Schmidtea mediteranean smed_20140614 Interproscan
Date Performed: 2020-05-01
|