MICOS complex subunit MIC10
Overview
Neoblast Clusters
Zeng et. al., 2018▻ Overview▻ Neoblast Population▻ Sub-lethal Irradiated Surviving X1 and X2 Cell Population
Overview
Single cell RNA-seq of pluripotent neoblasts and its early progeniesWe isolated X1 neoblasts cells enriched in high piwi-1 expression (Neoblast Population), and profiled ∼7,614 individual cells via scRNA-seq. Unsupervised analyses uncovered 12 distinct classes from 7,088 high-quality cells. We designated these classes Nb1 to Nb12 and ordered them based on high (Nb1) to low (Nb12) piwi-1 expression levels. We further defined groups of genes that best classified the cells parsed into 12 distinct cell clusters to generate a scaled expression heat map of discriminative gene sets for each cluster. Expression of each cluster’s gene signatures was validated using multiplex fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) co-stained with piwi-1 and largely confirmed the cell clusters revealed by scRNA-seq.We also tested sub-lethal irradiation exposure. To profile rare pluripotent stem cells (PSCs) and avoid interference from immediate progenitor cells, we determined a time point after sub-lethal irradiation (7 DPI) with minimal piwi-1+ cells, followed by isolation and single-cell RNA-seq of 1,200 individual cells derived from X1 (Piwi-1 high) and X2 (Piwi-1 low) cell populations (Sub-lethal Irradiated Surviving X1 and X2 Cell Population)Explore this single cell expression dataset with our NB Cluster Shiny App
Neoblast Population
Sub-lethal Irradiated Surviving X1 and X2 Cell Population
Embryonic Expression
Davies et. al., 2017
Hover the mouse over a column in the graph to view average RPKM values per sample. Embryonic Stages: Y: yolk. S2-S8: Stages 2-8. C4: asexual adult. SX: virgin, sexually mature adult. back to top Anatomical Expression
PAGE et. al., 2020SMED30029473 has been reported as being expressed in these anatomical structures and/or regions. Read more about PAGEPAGE Curations: 1
Homology
BLAST of MICOS complex subunit MIC10 vs. Ensembl Human
Match: MICOS10 (mitochondrial contact site and cristae organizing system subunit 10 [Source:HGNC Symbol;Acc:HGNC:32068]) HSP 1 Score: 65.4698 bits (158), Expect = 3.208e-14 Identity = 37/74 (50.00%), Postives = 50/74 (67.57%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 59 DEELGMKIDRCISDGFIKTIXXXXXXXXXXXMFFKRRPGPLIFGSALGLGMAIANCNNDLKQPLSLVSGKIHKQ 280 + ELG K DRC++D +K G G+G+V S+ FFKRR PL FGS +GLGMA +NC +D + P L+ GK K+ Sbjct: 3 ESELGRKWDRCLADAVVKIGTGFGLGIVFSLTFFKRRMWPLAFGSGMGLGMAYSNCQHDFQAPY-LLHGKYVKE 75
BLAST of MICOS complex subunit MIC10 vs. Ensembl Human
Match: MICOS10-NBL1 (MICOS10-NBL1 readthrough [Source:HGNC Symbol;Acc:HGNC:48338]) HSP 1 Score: 58.9214 bits (141), Expect = 6.743e-12 Identity = 34/69 (49.28%), Postives = 46/69 (66.67%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 77 KIDRCISDGFIKTIXXXXXXXXXXXMFFKRRPGPLIFGSALGLGMAIANCNNDLKQPLSLVSGKIHKQS 283 K DRC++D +K G G+G+V S+ FFKRR PL FGS +GLGMA +NC +D + P L+ GK K+ Sbjct: 2 KWDRCLADAVVKIGTGFGLGIVFSLTFFKRRMWPLAFGSGMGLGMAYSNCQHDFQAPY-LLHGKYVKEQ 69
BLAST of MICOS complex subunit MIC10 vs. Ensembl Human
Match: MICOS10 (mitochondrial contact site and cristae organizing system subunit 10 [Source:HGNC Symbol;Acc:HGNC:32068]) HSP 1 Score: 51.9878 bits (123), Expect = 2.711e-9 Identity = 28/74 (37.84%), Postives = 38/74 (51.35%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 59 DEELGMKIDRCISDGFIKTIXXXXXXXXXXXMFFKRRPGPLIFGSALGLGMAIANCNNDLKQPLSLVSGKIHKQ 280 + ELG K DRC++D +K R PL FGS +GLGMA +NC +D + P L+ GK K+ Sbjct: 3 ESELGRKWDRCLADAVVKI----------------GRMWPLAFGSGMGLGMAYSNCQHDFQAPY-LLHGKYVKE 59
BLAST of MICOS complex subunit MIC10 vs. Ensembl Human
Match: MICOS10-NBL1 (MICOS10-NBL1 readthrough [Source:HGNC Symbol;Acc:HGNC:48338]) HSP 1 Score: 50.0618 bits (118), Expect = 1.738e-8 Identity = 23/42 (54.76%), Postives = 29/42 (69.05%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 155 FFKRRPGPLIFGSALGLGMAIANCNNDLKQPLSLVSGKIHKQ 280 FFKRR PL FGS +GLGMA +NC +D + P L+ GK K+ Sbjct: 27 FFKRRMWPLAFGSGMGLGMAYSNCQHDFQAPY-LLHGKYVKE 67
BLAST of MICOS complex subunit MIC10 vs. Ensembl Celegans
Match: F54A3.5 (MICOS complex subunit Mic10 [Source:UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot;Acc:Q9N4K0]) HSP 1 Score: 59.6918 bits (143), Expect = 3.031e-12 Identity = 31/66 (46.97%), Postives = 42/66 (63.64%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 59 DEELGMKIDRCISDGFIKTIXXXXXXXXXXXMFFKRRPGPLIFGSALGLGMAIANCNNDLKQPLSL 256 ++E+G KIDRC +D +K G +G+VASV FFK R P+ FGS +GLG +NC +D P L Sbjct: 14 EDEVGQKIDRCFADSLLKVTGGVAIGIVASVAFFKSRSWPIWFGSGVGLGTGWSNCRHDFASPYVL 79
BLAST of MICOS complex subunit MIC10 vs. Ensembl Fly
Match: CG12479 (gene:FBgn0040871 transcript:FBtr0073869) HSP 1 Score: 46.595 bits (109), Expect = 2.140e-7 Identity = 23/65 (35.38%), Postives = 39/65 (60.00%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 44 MSAKIDEELGMKIDRCISDGFIKTIXXXXXXXXXXXMFFKRRPGPLIFGSALGLGMAIANCNNDL 238 MS ++ L I+RC+SD +K + G +G V +++FF+RR P+ G+ G+G+A C +L Sbjct: 1 MSTTPEDRLRENINRCLSDSLVKGVGGLVIGSVVTLLFFRRRIWPVWLGTGFGVGVAYRGCEKEL 65
BLAST of MICOS complex subunit MIC10 vs. Ensembl Zebrafish
Match: micos10 (mitochondrial contact site and cristae organizing system subunit 10 [Source:ZFIN;Acc:ZDB-GENE-060825-325]) HSP 1 Score: 61.6178 bits (148), Expect = 5.546e-13 Identity = 34/66 (51.52%), Postives = 46/66 (69.70%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 59 DEELGMKIDRCISDGFIKTIXXXXXXXXXXXMFFKRRPGPLIFGSALGLGMAIANCNNDLKQPLSL 256 ++ELG K DRC++D IK G G+G+V SV+FFKRR P+ G+ +GLGMA +NC NDL+ L Sbjct: 3 EKELGQKWDRCLADCAIKVGTGLGLGIVFSVVFFKRRTSPIALGTGIGLGMAYSNCQNDLRSHYQL 68
BLAST of MICOS complex subunit MIC10 vs. Ensembl Mouse
Match: Micos10 (mitochondrial contact site and cristae organizing system subunit 10 [Source:MGI Symbol;Acc:MGI:1913628]) HSP 1 Score: 63.5438 bits (153), Expect = 8.714e-14 Identity = 37/74 (50.00%), Postives = 50/74 (67.57%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 59 DEELGMKIDRCISDGFIKTIXXXXXXXXXXXMFFKRRPGPLIFGSALGLGMAIANCNNDLKQPLSLVSGKIHKQ 280 + ELG K DRC++D +K G G+G+V S+ FFKRR PL FGS +GLGMA +NC +D + P L+ GK K+ Sbjct: 3 ESELGRKWDRCMADTVVKLGTGFGLGIVFSLTFFKRRMWPLAFGSGVGLGMAYSNCQHDFQAPY-LLHGKYVKE 75
BLAST of MICOS complex subunit MIC10 vs. UniProt/SwissProt
Match: sp|Q5TGZ0|MIC10_HUMAN (MICOS complex subunit MIC10 OS=Homo sapiens OX=9606 GN=MICOS10 PE=1 SV=1) HSP 1 Score: 65.4698 bits (158), Expect = 1.540e-13 Identity = 37/74 (50.00%), Postives = 50/74 (67.57%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 59 DEELGMKIDRCISDGFIKTIXXXXXXXXXXXMFFKRRPGPLIFGSALGLGMAIANCNNDLKQPLSLVSGKIHKQ 280 + ELG K DRC++D +K G G+G+V S+ FFKRR PL FGS +GLGMA +NC +D + P L+ GK K+ Sbjct: 3 ESELGRKWDRCLADAVVKIGTGFGLGIVFSLTFFKRRMWPLAFGSGMGLGMAYSNCQHDFQAPY-LLHGKYVKE 75
BLAST of MICOS complex subunit MIC10 vs. UniProt/SwissProt
Match: sp|Q7TNS2|MIC10_MOUSE (MICOS complex subunit Mic10 OS=Mus musculus OX=10090 GN=Micos10 PE=1 SV=1) HSP 1 Score: 63.5438 bits (153), Expect = 6.096e-13 Identity = 37/74 (50.00%), Postives = 50/74 (67.57%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 59 DEELGMKIDRCISDGFIKTIXXXXXXXXXXXMFFKRRPGPLIFGSALGLGMAIANCNNDLKQPLSLVSGKIHKQ 280 + ELG K DRC++D +K G G+G+V S+ FFKRR PL FGS +GLGMA +NC +D + P L+ GK K+ Sbjct: 3 ESELGRKWDRCMADTVVKLGTGFGLGIVFSLTFFKRRMWPLAFGSGVGLGMAYSNCQHDFQAPY-LLHGKYVKE 75
BLAST of MICOS complex subunit MIC10 vs. UniProt/SwissProt
Match: sp|B2RYW8|MIC10_RAT (MICOS complex subunit Mic10 OS=Rattus norvegicus OX=10116 GN=Micos10 PE=3 SV=1) HSP 1 Score: 62.7734 bits (151), Expect = 1.249e-12 Identity = 36/74 (48.65%), Postives = 49/74 (66.22%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 59 DEELGMKIDRCISDGFIKTIXXXXXXXXXXXMFFKRRPGPLIFGSALGLGMAIANCNNDLKQPLSLVSGKIHKQ 280 + E G K DRC++D +K G G+G+V S+ FFKRR PL FGS +GLGMA +NC +D + P L+ GK K+ Sbjct: 3 ESEPGRKWDRCMADALVKLGTGFGLGMVFSLTFFKRRKWPLAFGSGVGLGMAYSNCQHDFQAPY-LLHGKYVKE 75
BLAST of MICOS complex subunit MIC10 vs. UniProt/SwissProt
Match: sp|Q9N4K0|MIC10_CAEEL (MICOS complex subunit Mic10 OS=Caenorhabditis elegans OX=6239 GN=F54A3.5 PE=3 SV=2) HSP 1 Score: 59.6918 bits (143), Expect = 3.856e-11 Identity = 31/66 (46.97%), Postives = 42/66 (63.64%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 59 DEELGMKIDRCISDGFIKTIXXXXXXXXXXXMFFKRRPGPLIFGSALGLGMAIANCNNDLKQPLSL 256 ++E+G KIDRC +D +K G +G+VASV FFK R P+ FGS +GLG +NC +D P L Sbjct: 14 EDEVGQKIDRCFADSLLKVTGGVAIGIVASVAFFKSRSWPIWFGSGVGLGTGWSNCRHDFASPYVL 79
BLAST of MICOS complex subunit MIC10 vs. TrEMBL
Match: Q5BSC7 (MICOS complex subunit MIC10 OS=Schistosoma japonicum OX=6182 GN=EWB00_004079 PE=2 SV=1) HSP 1 Score: 82.8037 bits (203), Expect = 1.046e-17 Identity = 45/73 (61.64%), Postives = 54/73 (73.97%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 53 KIDEELGMKIDRCISDGFIKTIXXXXXXXXXXXMFFKRRPGPLIFGSALGLGMAIANCNNDLKQPLSLVSGKI 271 K ++ LG K+DRCISD IKT G G++ SV+F KRRP PLIFG+ GLGM I+NCNND KQPL LVS +I Sbjct: 6 KSEDILGFKLDRCISDTLIKTGAGLFGGIIFSVVFAKRRPWPLIFGTGFGLGMGISNCNNDFKQPLPLVSHRI 78
BLAST of MICOS complex subunit MIC10 vs. TrEMBL
Match: A0A183BGC3 (MICOS complex subunit MIC10 OS=Echinostoma caproni OX=27848 GN=ECPE_LOCUS18258 PE=3 SV=1) HSP 1 Score: 82.8037 bits (203), Expect = 1.313e-17 Identity = 45/80 (56.25%), Postives = 60/80 (75.00%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 47 SAKIDEELGMKIDRCISDGFIKTIXXXXXXXXXXXMFFKRRPGPLIFGSALGLGMAIANCNNDLKQPLSLVSGKIHKQSI 286 SAK ++ LG+++DRCISD IKT GA +G++ SV+ K +P P++FG+ LGLGM+IANCNND KQPL LVS +I S Sbjct: 4 SAKSEDILGLRLDRCISDTLIKTGSGAFMGIIFSVLLAKSKPWPVVFGTGLGLGMSIANCNNDFKQPLPLVSHRIKVSSF 83
BLAST of MICOS complex subunit MIC10 vs. TrEMBL
Match: C1LK15 (MICOS complex subunit MIC10 OS=Schistosoma japonicum OX=6182 PE=2 SV=1) HSP 1 Score: 80.8777 bits (198), Expect = 5.364e-17 Identity = 44/70 (62.86%), Postives = 52/70 (74.29%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 53 KIDEELGMKIDRCISDGFIKTIXXXXXXXXXXXMFFKRRPGPLIFGSALGLGMAIANCNNDLKQPLSLVS 262 K ++ LG K+DRCISD IKT G G++ SV+F KRRP PLIFG+ GLGM I+NCNND KQPL LVS Sbjct: 6 KSEDILGFKLDRCISDTLIKTGAGLFGGIIFSVVFAKRRPWPLIFGTGFGLGMGISNCNNDFKQPLPLVS 75
BLAST of MICOS complex subunit MIC10 vs. TrEMBL
Match: A0A146MHV0 (MICOS complex subunit MIC10 OS=Schistosoma mansoni OX=6183 GN=c797_g1_i1 PE=3 SV=1) HSP 1 Score: 80.4925 bits (197), Expect = 8.806e-17 Identity = 44/73 (60.27%), Postives = 53/73 (72.60%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 53 KIDEELGMKIDRCISDGFIKTIXXXXXXXXXXXMFFKRRPGPLIFGSALGLGMAIANCNNDLKQPLSLVSGKI 271 K ++ LG K+DRCISD IKT G G++ SV+ KRRP PLIFG+ GLGM I+NCNND KQPL LVS +I Sbjct: 6 KSEDILGFKLDRCISDTLIKTGAGLFGGIIFSVVLAKRRPWPLIFGTGFGLGMGISNCNNDFKQPLPLVSHRI 78
BLAST of MICOS complex subunit MIC10 vs. TrEMBL
Match: A0A146MGH5 (MICOS complex subunit MIC10 OS=Schistosoma mansoni OX=6183 GN=c797_g1_i2 PE=3 SV=1) HSP 1 Score: 80.4925 bits (197), Expect = 9.370e-17 Identity = 44/73 (60.27%), Postives = 53/73 (72.60%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 53 KIDEELGMKIDRCISDGFIKTIXXXXXXXXXXXMFFKRRPGPLIFGSALGLGMAIANCNNDLKQPLSLVSGKI 271 K ++ LG K+DRCISD IKT G G++ SV+ KRRP PLIFG+ GLGM I+NCNND KQPL LVS +I Sbjct: 6 KSEDILGFKLDRCISDTLIKTGAGLFGGIIFSVVLAKRRPWPLIFGTGFGLGMGISNCNNDFKQPLPLVSHRI 78
BLAST of MICOS complex subunit MIC10 vs. Ensembl Cavefish
Match: ENSAMXT00000030462.1 (pep primary_assembly:Astyanax_mexicanus-2.0:22:18042672:18051540:1 gene:ENSAMXG00000040088.1 transcript:ENSAMXT00000030462.1 gene_biotype:protein_coding transcript_biotype:protein_coding) HSP 1 Score: 68.9366 bits (167), Expect = 7.413e-16 Identity = 35/65 (53.85%), Postives = 47/65 (72.31%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 62 EELGMKIDRCISDGFIKTIXXXXXXXXXXXMFFKRRPGPLIFGSALGLGMAIANCNNDLKQPLSL 256 E+ G K DRC+SD +KT++G GVG + SV+FFKRR P+ FG+ +GLGMA +NC +D K P L Sbjct: 2 EDSGRKWDRCVSDSAVKTVLGLGVGALFSVLFFKRRSWPIAFGAGMGLGMAYSNCQHDFKSPYLL 66
BLAST of MICOS complex subunit MIC10 vs. Ensembl Cavefish
Match: micos10 (MICOS complex subunit MIC10 [Source:NCBI gene;Acc:103047888]) HSP 1 Score: 65.855 bits (159), Expect = 1.141e-14 Identity = 37/74 (50.00%), Postives = 50/74 (67.57%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 59 DEELGMKIDRCISDGFIKTIXXXXXXXXXXXMFFKRRPGPLIFGSALGLGMAIANCNNDLKQPLSLVSGKIHKQ 280 ++ELG K DRC++D IK G G+G+V SV+FFKRR P+ FG+ GLGMA +NC NDL+ P + S +Q Sbjct: 3 EKELGQKWDRCLADAAIKVGAGLGLGIVFSVVFFKRRTFPIAFGTGTGLGMAYSNCQNDLRSPYLVHSNATKEQ 76
BLAST of MICOS complex subunit MIC10 vs. Ensembl Medaka
Match: ENSORLT00000035437.1 (pep primary_assembly:ASM223467v1:7:1586357:1587485:1 gene:ENSORLG00000024698.1 transcript:ENSORLT00000035437.1 gene_biotype:protein_coding transcript_biotype:protein_coding) HSP 1 Score: 66.6254 bits (161), Expect = 6.190e-15 Identity = 41/83 (49.40%), Postives = 52/83 (62.65%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 59 DEELGMKIDRCISDGFIKTIXXXXXXXXXXXMFFKRRPGPLIFGSALGLGMAIANCNNDLKQPLSLVSGKIHKQSILELAQTT 307 + ELG K+DRC++DG IK G G+G+V SV+FFKR P+ FGS GLGMA ANC NDL+ L H+ + LA T Sbjct: 3 ERELGRKLDRCLADGVIKLGTGLGLGIVFSVLFFKRHAWPISFGSGAGLGMAYANCQNDLRWHYLL-----HRNPKVALADET 80
BLAST of MICOS complex subunit MIC10 vs. Ensembl Medaka
Match: ENSORLT00000027538.1 (mitochondrial contact site and cristae organizing system subunit 10 [Source:NCBI gene;Acc:101167281]) HSP 1 Score: 65.0846 bits (157), Expect = 1.274e-13 Identity = 37/78 (47.44%), Postives = 52/78 (66.67%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 53 KIDEELGMKIDRCISDGFIKTIXXXXXXXXXXXMFFKRRPGPLIFGSALGLGMAIANCNNDLKQPLSLVSGKIHKQSI 286 K+ +E G K DRC++D +KT+ G GVGVV SV+F KRR P+ FGS LGLGM +NC +D + P +IH +++ Sbjct: 77 KMADEYGRKWDRCLADTAVKTVTGLGVGVVFSVLFLKRRTWPVSFGSGLGLGMGYSNCQHDFRLPY-----RIHGRTV 149
BLAST of MICOS complex subunit MIC10 vs. Ensembl Medaka
Match: ENSORLT00000029141.1 (pep primary_assembly:ASM223467v1:7:1586357:1587485:1 gene:ENSORLG00000024698.1 transcript:ENSORLT00000029141.1 gene_biotype:protein_coding transcript_biotype:protein_coding) HSP 1 Score: 51.6026 bits (122), Expect = 2.630e-9 Identity = 31/83 (37.35%), Postives = 39/83 (46.99%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 59 DEELGMKIDRCISDGFIKTIXXXXXXXXXXXMFFKRRPGPLIFGSALGLGMAIANCNNDLKQPLSLVSGKIHKQSILELAQTT 307 + ELG K+DRC++DG IK P+ FGS GLGMA ANC NDL+ L H+ + LA T Sbjct: 3 ERELGRKLDRCLADGVIKL----------------GHAWPISFGSGAGLGMAYANCQNDLRWHYLL-----HRNPKVALADET 64
BLAST of MICOS complex subunit MIC10 vs. Planmine SMEST
Match: SMESG000039213.1 (SMESG000039213.1) HSP 1 Score: 233.032 bits (593), Expect = 9.010e-80 Identity = 141/141 (100.00%), Postives = 141/141 (100.00%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 44 MSAKIDEELGMKIDRCISDGFIKTIXXXXXXXXXXXMFFKRRPGPLIFGSALGLGMAIANCNNDLKQPLSLVSGKIHKQSILELAQTTGSQITKTSNVTDINTMKGDGASRTXXXXXXXXXXXXXDPASFSVKGCKKRTKN 466 MSAKIDEELGMKIDRCISDGFIKTIVGAGVGVVASVMFFKRRPGPLIFGSALGLGMAIANCNNDLKQPLSLVSGKIHKQSILELAQTTGSQITKTSNVTDINTMKGDGASRTEKSNEKSNEKNSEDPASFSVKGCKKRTKN Sbjct: 1 MSAKIDEELGMKIDRCISDGFIKTIVGAGVGVVASVMFFKRRPGPLIFGSALGLGMAIANCNNDLKQPLSLVSGKIHKQSILELAQTTGSQITKTSNVTDINTMKGDGASRTEKSNEKSNEKNSEDPASFSVKGCKKRTKN 141
BLAST of MICOS complex subunit MIC10 vs. Planmine SMEST
Match: SMESG000009106.1 (SMESG000009106.1) HSP 1 Score: 75.8702 bits (185), Expect = 1.119e-18 Identity = 37/76 (48.68%), Postives = 54/76 (71.05%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 50 AKIDEELGMKIDRCISDGFIKTIXXXXXXXXXXXMFFKRRPGPLIFGSALGLGMAIANCNNDLKQPLSLVSGKIHK 277 K ++ELG+K+DRC SD +K G +G+V S + FKR+PG ++F + +G+GMA+ANCNND K P S+V +I K Sbjct: 4 VKTEDELGVKVDRCFSDAVVKIAGGVSIGIVGSFLLFKRKPGIILFSTGIGIGMALANCNNDFKMPCSVVHNQIIK 79
BLAST of MICOS complex subunit MIC10 vs. Planmine SMEST
Match: SMESG000009106.1 (SMESG000009106.1) HSP 1 Score: 75.0998 bits (183), Expect = 1.870e-18 Identity = 36/74 (48.65%), Postives = 53/74 (71.62%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 50 AKIDEELGMKIDRCISDGFIKTIXXXXXXXXXXXMFFKRRPGPLIFGSALGLGMAIANCNNDLKQPLSLVSGKI 271 K ++ELG+K+DRC SD +K G +G+V S + FKR+PG ++F + +G+GMA+ANCNND K P S+V +I Sbjct: 4 VKTEDELGVKVDRCFSDAVVKIAGGVSIGIVGSFLLFKRKPGIILFSTGIGIGMALANCNNDFKMPCSVVHNQI 77 The following BLAST results are available for this feature:
BLAST of MICOS complex subunit MIC10 vs. Ensembl Human
Analysis Date: 2016-08-08 (Schmidtea mediterranea smed_20140614 BLASTX Human e!99) Total hits: 4
BLAST of MICOS complex subunit MIC10 vs. Ensembl Celegans
Analysis Date: 2020-05-01 (Schmidtea mediterranea smed_20140614 BLASTX Celegan e!99) Total hits: 1
BLAST of MICOS complex subunit MIC10 vs. Ensembl Fly
Analysis Date: 2020-05-01 (Schmidtea mediterranea smed_20140614 BLASTX Drosophila e!99) Total hits: 1
BLAST of MICOS complex subunit MIC10 vs. Ensembl Zebrafish
Analysis Date: 2016-08-08 (Schmidtea mediterranea smed_20140614 BLASTX Zebrafish e!99) Total hits: 1
BLAST of MICOS complex subunit MIC10 vs. Ensembl Xenopus
Analysis Date: 2020-05-01 (Schmidtea mediterranea smed_20140614 BLASTX Xenopus e!99) Total hits: 0
BLAST of MICOS complex subunit MIC10 vs. Ensembl Mouse
Analysis Date: 2020-05-01 (Schmidtea mediterranea smed_20140614 BLASTX Mouse e!99) Total hits: 1
BLAST of MICOS complex subunit MIC10 vs. UniProt/SwissProt
Analysis Date: 2020-05-01 (Schmidtea mediterranea smed_20140614 BLASTX EMBL-EBI UniProt) Total hits: 4
BLAST of MICOS complex subunit MIC10 vs. TrEMBL
Analysis Date: 2020-05-01 (Schmidtea mediterranea smed_20140614 BLASTX EMBL-EBI TrEMBL) Total hits: 5
BLAST of MICOS complex subunit MIC10 vs. Ensembl Cavefish
Analysis Date: 2020-05-08 (Schmidtea mediterranea smed_20140614 BLASTX Cavefish e!99) Total hits: 2
BLAST of MICOS complex subunit MIC10 vs. Ensembl Sea Lamprey
Analysis Date: 2020-05-08 (Schmidtea mediterranea smed_20140614 BLASTX Sea Lamprey e!99) Total hits: 0
BLAST of MICOS complex subunit MIC10 vs. Ensembl Yeast
Analysis Date: 2020-05-08 (Schmidtea mediterranea smed_20140614 BLASTX Yeast e!Fungi46) Total hits: 0
BLAST of MICOS complex subunit MIC10 vs. Ensembl Nematostella
Analysis Date: 2020-05-08 (Schmidtea mediterranea smed_20140614 BLASTX Nematostella e!Metazoa46) Total hits: 0
BLAST of MICOS complex subunit MIC10 vs. Ensembl Medaka
Analysis Date: 2020-05-08 (Schmidtea mediterranea smed_20140614 BLASTX Medaka e!99) Total hits: 3
BLAST of MICOS complex subunit MIC10 vs. Planmine SMEST
Analysis Date: 2020-05-08 (Schmidtea mediterranea smed_20140614 BLASTX Planmine SMEST) Total hits: 3
Analyses
This transcript is derived from or has results from the following analyses Sequences
The following sequences are available for this feature:
transcript sequence >SMED30029473 ID=SMED30029473|Name=MICOS complex subunit MIC10|organism=Schmidtea mediterranea sexual|type=transcript|length=479bpback to top protein sequence of SMED30029473-orf-1 >SMED30029473-orf-1 ID=SMED30029473-orf-1|Name=SMED30029473-orf-1|organism=Schmidtea mediterranea sexual|type=polypeptide|length=142bp MSAKIDEELGMKIDRCISDGFIKTIVGAGVGVVASVMFFKRRPGPLIFGSback to top Annotated Terms
The following terms have been associated with this transcript:
InterPro
Analysis Name: Schmidtea mediteranean smed_20140614 Interproscan
Date Performed: 2020-05-01
|