Cytochrome c
Overview
Neoblast Clusters
Zeng et. al., 2018▻ Overview▻ Neoblast Population▻ Sub-lethal Irradiated Surviving X1 and X2 Cell Population
Overview
Single cell RNA-seq of pluripotent neoblasts and its early progeniesWe isolated X1 neoblasts cells enriched in high piwi-1 expression (Neoblast Population), and profiled ∼7,614 individual cells via scRNA-seq. Unsupervised analyses uncovered 12 distinct classes from 7,088 high-quality cells. We designated these classes Nb1 to Nb12 and ordered them based on high (Nb1) to low (Nb12) piwi-1 expression levels. We further defined groups of genes that best classified the cells parsed into 12 distinct cell clusters to generate a scaled expression heat map of discriminative gene sets for each cluster. Expression of each cluster’s gene signatures was validated using multiplex fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) co-stained with piwi-1 and largely confirmed the cell clusters revealed by scRNA-seq.We also tested sub-lethal irradiation exposure. To profile rare pluripotent stem cells (PSCs) and avoid interference from immediate progenitor cells, we determined a time point after sub-lethal irradiation (7 DPI) with minimal piwi-1+ cells, followed by isolation and single-cell RNA-seq of 1,200 individual cells derived from X1 (Piwi-1 high) and X2 (Piwi-1 low) cell populations (Sub-lethal Irradiated Surviving X1 and X2 Cell Population)Explore this single cell expression dataset with our NB Cluster Shiny App
Neoblast Population
Sub-lethal Irradiated Surviving X1 and X2 Cell Population
Embryonic Expression
Davies et. al., 2017
Hover the mouse over a column in the graph to view average RPKM values per sample. Embryonic Stages: Y: yolk. S2-S8: Stages 2-8. C4: asexual adult. SX: virgin, sexually mature adult. back to top Anatomical Expression
PAGE et. al., 2020SMED30021332 has been reported as being expressed in these anatomical structures and/or regions. Read more about PAGEPAGE Curations: 6
Homology
BLAST of Cytochrome c vs. Ensembl Human
Match: CYCS (cytochrome c, somatic [Source:HGNC Symbol;Acc:HGNC:19986]) HSP 1 Score: 176.022 bits (445), Expect = 3.923e-57 Identity = 79/102 (77.45%), Postives = 92/102 (90.20%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 134 GNVTKGKSLFVQRCSQCHTVEKGGAHKTGPNLNGLFGRKTGQAPGYDYTAANKNKGIVWGPDTLFEYLHDPRKYIPGTKMVFAGLKKEKERADIIAYLKDAT 439 G+V KGK +F+ +CSQCHTVEKGG HKTGPNL+GLFGRKTGQAPGY YTAANKNKGI+WG DTL EYL +P+KYIPGTKM+F G+KK++ERAD+IAYLK AT Sbjct: 2 GDVEKGKKIFIMKCSQCHTVEKGGKHKTGPNLHGLFGRKTGQAPGYSYTAANKNKGIIWGEDTLMEYLENPKKYIPGTKMIFVGIKKKEERADLIAYLKKAT 103
BLAST of Cytochrome c vs. Ensembl Human
Match: CYCS (cytochrome c, somatic [Source:HGNC Symbol;Acc:HGNC:19986]) HSP 1 Score: 176.022 bits (445), Expect = 3.923e-57 Identity = 79/102 (77.45%), Postives = 92/102 (90.20%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 134 GNVTKGKSLFVQRCSQCHTVEKGGAHKTGPNLNGLFGRKTGQAPGYDYTAANKNKGIVWGPDTLFEYLHDPRKYIPGTKMVFAGLKKEKERADIIAYLKDAT 439 G+V KGK +F+ +CSQCHTVEKGG HKTGPNL+GLFGRKTGQAPGY YTAANKNKGI+WG DTL EYL +P+KYIPGTKM+F G+KK++ERAD+IAYLK AT Sbjct: 2 GDVEKGKKIFIMKCSQCHTVEKGGKHKTGPNLHGLFGRKTGQAPGYSYTAANKNKGIIWGEDTLMEYLENPKKYIPGTKMIFVGIKKKEERADLIAYLKKAT 103
BLAST of Cytochrome c vs. Ensembl Human
Match: CYCS (cytochrome c, somatic [Source:HGNC Symbol;Acc:HGNC:19986]) HSP 1 Score: 176.022 bits (445), Expect = 3.923e-57 Identity = 79/102 (77.45%), Postives = 92/102 (90.20%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 134 GNVTKGKSLFVQRCSQCHTVEKGGAHKTGPNLNGLFGRKTGQAPGYDYTAANKNKGIVWGPDTLFEYLHDPRKYIPGTKMVFAGLKKEKERADIIAYLKDAT 439 G+V KGK +F+ +CSQCHTVEKGG HKTGPNL+GLFGRKTGQAPGY YTAANKNKGI+WG DTL EYL +P+KYIPGTKM+F G+KK++ERAD+IAYLK AT Sbjct: 2 GDVEKGKKIFIMKCSQCHTVEKGGKHKTGPNLHGLFGRKTGQAPGYSYTAANKNKGIIWGEDTLMEYLENPKKYIPGTKMIFVGIKKKEERADLIAYLKKAT 103
BLAST of Cytochrome c vs. Ensembl Human
Match: CYCS (cytochrome c, somatic [Source:HGNC Symbol;Acc:HGNC:19986]) HSP 1 Score: 172.17 bits (435), Expect = 1.281e-55 Identity = 77/99 (77.78%), Postives = 90/99 (90.91%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 134 GNVTKGKSLFVQRCSQCHTVEKGGAHKTGPNLNGLFGRKTGQAPGYDYTAANKNKGIVWGPDTLFEYLHDPRKYIPGTKMVFAGLKKEKERADIIAYLK 430 G+V KGK +F+ +CSQCHTVEKGG HKTGPNL+GLFGRKTGQAPGY YTAANKNKGI+WG DTL EYL +P+KYIPGTKM+F G+KK++ERAD+IAYLK Sbjct: 2 GDVEKGKKIFIMKCSQCHTVEKGGKHKTGPNLHGLFGRKTGQAPGYSYTAANKNKGIIWGEDTLMEYLENPKKYIPGTKMIFVGIKKKEERADLIAYLK 100
BLAST of Cytochrome c vs. Ensembl Celegans
Match: cyc-2.2 (Probable cytochrome c 2.2 [Source:UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot;Acc:Q23240]) HSP 1 Score: 141.354 bits (355), Expect = 1.638e-43 Identity = 64/103 (62.14%), Postives = 79/103 (76.70%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 122 TVPEGNVTKGKSLFVQRCSQCHTVEKGGAHKTGPNLNGLFGRKTGQAPGYDYTAANKNKGIVWGPDTLFEYLHDPRKYIPGTKMVFAGLKKEKERADIIAYLK 430 +PEG+ KGK +F QRC QCH V KTGP LNG+ GR++GQ G+DY+AANKNKG+VW TLF+YL DP+KYIPGTKMVFAGLKK ERAD+I +++ Sbjct: 13 AIPEGDNEKGKKIFKQRCEQCHVVN-SLQTKTGPTLNGVIGRQSGQVAGFDYSAANKNKGVVWDRQTLFDYLADPKKYIPGTKMVFAGLKKADERADLIKFIE 114
BLAST of Cytochrome c vs. Ensembl Celegans
Match: cyc-2.1 (Cytochrome c 2.1 [Source:UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot;Acc:P19974]) HSP 1 Score: 135.961 bits (341), Expect = 1.364e-41 Identity = 62/102 (60.78%), Postives = 79/102 (77.45%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 125 VPEGNVTKGKSLFVQRCSQCHTVEKGGAHKTGPNLNGLFGRKTGQAPGYDYTAANKNKGIVWGPDTLFEYLHDPRKYIPGTKMVFAGLKKEKERADIIAYLK 430 +P G+ KGK ++ QRC QCH V+ A KTGP L+G+ GR +G G+DY+AANKNKG+VW +TLFEYL +P+KYIPGTKMVFAGLKK ERAD+I Y++ Sbjct: 4 IPAGDYEKGKKVYKQRCLQCHVVD-STATKTGPTLHGVIGRTSGTVSGFDYSAANKNKGVVWTRETLFEYLLNPKKYIPGTKMVFAGLKKADERADLIKYIE 104
BLAST of Cytochrome c vs. Ensembl Celegans
Match: cyc-2.1 (Cytochrome c 2.1 [Source:UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot;Acc:P19974]) HSP 1 Score: 135.961 bits (341), Expect = 1.364e-41 Identity = 62/102 (60.78%), Postives = 79/102 (77.45%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 125 VPEGNVTKGKSLFVQRCSQCHTVEKGGAHKTGPNLNGLFGRKTGQAPGYDYTAANKNKGIVWGPDTLFEYLHDPRKYIPGTKMVFAGLKKEKERADIIAYLK 430 +P G+ KGK ++ QRC QCH V+ A KTGP L+G+ GR +G G+DY+AANKNKG+VW +TLFEYL +P+KYIPGTKMVFAGLKK ERAD+I Y++ Sbjct: 4 IPAGDYEKGKKVYKQRCLQCHVVD-STATKTGPTLHGVIGRTSGTVSGFDYSAANKNKGVVWTRETLFEYLLNPKKYIPGTKMVFAGLKKADERADLIKYIE 104
BLAST of Cytochrome c vs. Ensembl Celegans
Match: cyc-2.1 (Cytochrome c 2.1 [Source:UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot;Acc:P19974]) HSP 1 Score: 135.961 bits (341), Expect = 1.364e-41 Identity = 62/102 (60.78%), Postives = 79/102 (77.45%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 125 VPEGNVTKGKSLFVQRCSQCHTVEKGGAHKTGPNLNGLFGRKTGQAPGYDYTAANKNKGIVWGPDTLFEYLHDPRKYIPGTKMVFAGLKKEKERADIIAYLK 430 +P G+ KGK ++ QRC QCH V+ A KTGP L+G+ GR +G G+DY+AANKNKG+VW +TLFEYL +P+KYIPGTKMVFAGLKK ERAD+I Y++ Sbjct: 4 IPAGDYEKGKKVYKQRCLQCHVVD-STATKTGPTLHGVIGRTSGTVSGFDYSAANKNKGVVWTRETLFEYLLNPKKYIPGTKMVFAGLKKADERADLIKYIE 104
BLAST of Cytochrome c vs. Ensembl Fly
Match: Cyt-c-p (gene:FBgn0284248 transcript:FBtr0080889) HSP 1 Score: 169.474 bits (428), Expect = 8.664e-55 Identity = 80/108 (74.07%), Postives = 88/108 (81.48%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 119 MTVPEGNVTKGKSLFVQRCSQCHTVEKGGAHKTGPNLNGLFGRKTGQAPGYDYTAANKNKGIVWGPDTLFEYLHDPRKYIPGTKMVFAGLKKEKERADIIAYLKDATK 442 M VP G+V KGK LFVQRC+QCHTVE GG HK GPNL+GL GRKTGQA G+ YT ANK KGI W DTLFEYL +P+KYIPGTKM+FAGLKK ER D+IAYLK ATK Sbjct: 1 MGVPAGDVEKGKKLFVQRCAQCHTVEAGGKHKVGPNLHGLIGRKTGQAAGFAYTDANKAKGITWNEDTLFEYLENPKKYIPGTKMIFAGLKKPNERGDLIAYLKSATK 108
BLAST of Cytochrome c vs. Ensembl Fly
Match: Cyt-c-p (gene:FBgn0284248 transcript:FBtr0344849) HSP 1 Score: 169.474 bits (428), Expect = 8.664e-55 Identity = 80/108 (74.07%), Postives = 88/108 (81.48%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 119 MTVPEGNVTKGKSLFVQRCSQCHTVEKGGAHKTGPNLNGLFGRKTGQAPGYDYTAANKNKGIVWGPDTLFEYLHDPRKYIPGTKMVFAGLKKEKERADIIAYLKDATK 442 M VP G+V KGK LFVQRC+QCHTVE GG HK GPNL+GL GRKTGQA G+ YT ANK KGI W DTLFEYL +P+KYIPGTKM+FAGLKK ER D+IAYLK ATK Sbjct: 1 MGVPAGDVEKGKKLFVQRCAQCHTVEAGGKHKVGPNLHGLIGRKTGQAAGFAYTDANKAKGITWNEDTLFEYLENPKKYIPGTKMIFAGLKKPNERGDLIAYLKSATK 108
BLAST of Cytochrome c vs. Ensembl Fly
Match: Cyt-c-d (gene:FBgn0086907 transcript:FBtr0080888) HSP 1 Score: 136.346 bits (342), Expect = 8.550e-42 Identity = 64/99 (64.65%), Postives = 74/99 (74.75%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 134 GNVTKGKSLFVQRCSQCHTVEKGGAHKTGPNLNGLFGRKTGQAPGYDYTAANKNKGIVWGPDTLFEYLHDPRKYIPGTKMVFAGLKKEKERADIIAYLK 430 G+ GK +FVQ+C+QCHT E GG HK GPNL G+ GRK G A GY YT AN KG+ W L EYL DP+KYIPGTKMVFAGLKK +ERAD+IA+LK Sbjct: 4 GDAENGKKIFVQKCAQCHTYEVGGKHKVGPNLGGVVGRKCGTAAGYKYTDANIKKGVTWTEGNLDEYLKDPKKYIPGTKMVFAGLKKAEERADLIAFLK 102
BLAST of Cytochrome c vs. Ensembl Fly
Match: Cyt-c-d (gene:FBgn0086907 transcript:FBtr0335141) HSP 1 Score: 136.346 bits (342), Expect = 8.550e-42 Identity = 64/99 (64.65%), Postives = 74/99 (74.75%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 134 GNVTKGKSLFVQRCSQCHTVEKGGAHKTGPNLNGLFGRKTGQAPGYDYTAANKNKGIVWGPDTLFEYLHDPRKYIPGTKMVFAGLKKEKERADIIAYLK 430 G+ GK +FVQ+C+QCHT E GG HK GPNL G+ GRK G A GY YT AN KG+ W L EYL DP+KYIPGTKMVFAGLKK +ERAD+IA+LK Sbjct: 4 GDAENGKKIFVQKCAQCHTYEVGGKHKVGPNLGGVVGRKCGTAAGYKYTDANIKKGVTWTEGNLDEYLKDPKKYIPGTKMVFAGLKKAEERADLIAFLK 102
BLAST of Cytochrome c vs. Ensembl Zebrafish
Match: cycsb (cytochrome c, somatic b [Source:NCBI gene;Acc:415158]) HSP 1 Score: 165.622 bits (418), Expect = 4.232e-53 Identity = 76/102 (74.51%), Postives = 88/102 (86.27%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 134 GNVTKGKSLFVQRCSQCHTVEKGGAHKTGPNLNGLFGRKTGQAPGYDYTAANKNKGIVWGPDTLFEYLHDPRKYIPGTKMVFAGLKKEKERADIIAYLKDAT 439 G+V KGK +FVQ+C+QCHTVE GG HK GPNL GLFGRKTGQA G+ YT ANK+KGIVWG DTL EYL +P+KYIPGTKM+FAG+KK+ ERAD+IAYLK AT Sbjct: 2 GDVEKGKKVFVQKCAQCHTVENGGKHKVGPNLWGLFGRKTGQAEGFSYTDANKSKGIVWGEDTLMEYLENPKKYIPGTKMIFAGIKKKGERADLIAYLKSAT 103
BLAST of Cytochrome c vs. Ensembl Zebrafish
Match: cycsa (cytochrome c, somatic a [Source:ZFIN;Acc:ZDB-GENE-060503-627]) HSP 1 Score: 64.3142 bits (155), Expect = 6.715e-14 Identity = 31/55 (56.36%), Postives = 38/55 (69.09%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 131 EGNVTKGKSLFVQRCSQCHTVEKGGAHKTGPNLNGLFGRKTGQAPGYDYTAANKN 295 E ++ KGK +FVQ+CSQCHT+E G HK GPNL GLFGR TG+ + TA K Sbjct: 3 ERDLEKGKKIFVQKCSQCHTIEICGKHKVGPNLYGLFGRMTGRV--HRVTATQKT 55
BLAST of Cytochrome c vs. Ensembl Xenopus
Match: brd7 (bromodomain containing 7 [Source:Xenbase;Acc:XB-GENE-1017005]) HSP 1 Score: 170.629 bits (431), Expect = 5.279e-55 Identity = 78/102 (76.47%), Postives = 91/102 (89.22%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 134 GNVTKGKSLFVQRCSQCHTVEKGGAHKTGPNLNGLFGRKTGQAPGYDYTAANKNKGIVWGPDTLFEYLHDPRKYIPGTKMVFAGLKKEKERADIIAYLKDAT 439 G+V KGK +FVQ+C+QCHTVEK G HKTGPNL GLFGRKTGQAPG+ YT ANK+KGIVWG DTLFEYL +P+KYIPGTKM+FAG+KK+ ERAD+IAYLK +T Sbjct: 2 GDVEKGKKIFVQKCAQCHTVEKTGKHKTGPNLWGLFGRKTGQAPGFSYTDANKSKGIVWGEDTLFEYLENPKKYIPGTKMIFAGIKKKNERADLIAYLKKST 103
BLAST of Cytochrome c vs. Ensembl Xenopus
Match: pgr (progesterone receptor [Source:Xenbase;Acc:XB-GENE-484457]) HSP 1 Score: 164.081 bits (414), Expect = 2.236e-52 Identity = 75/102 (73.53%), Postives = 87/102 (85.29%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 134 GNVTKGKSLFVQRCSQCHTVEKGGAHKTGPNLNGLFGRKTGQAPGYDYTAANKNKGIVWGPDTLFEYLHDPRKYIPGTKMVFAGLKKEKERADIIAYLKDAT 439 G+ KGK +FVQ+CSQCHTVEKGG HKTGPNL+GLFGRKTGQA G+ YT ANKNKGIVW TL EYL +P+KYIPGTKM+FAG+KK+ ER D+IAYLK +T Sbjct: 2 GDAEKGKKIFVQKCSQCHTVEKGGKHKTGPNLHGLFGRKTGQAEGFSYTDANKNKGIVWDEGTLLEYLENPKKYIPGTKMIFAGIKKKGERQDLIAYLKQST 103
BLAST of Cytochrome c vs. Ensembl Mouse
Match: Gm10053 (predicted gene 10053 [Source:MGI Symbol;Acc:MGI:3704493]) HSP 1 Score: 170.244 bits (430), Expect = 5.928e-55 Identity = 78/102 (76.47%), Postives = 90/102 (88.24%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 134 GNVTKGKSLFVQRCSQCHTVEKGGAHKTGPNLNGLFGRKTGQAPGYDYTAANKNKGIVWGPDTLFEYLHDPRKYIPGTKMVFAGLKKEKERADIIAYLKDAT 439 G+V KGK +FVQ+C+QCHTVEKGG HKTGPNL+GLFGRKTGQA G+ YT ANKNKGI WG DTL EYL +P+KYIPGTKM+FAG+KK+ ERAD+IAYLK AT Sbjct: 2 GDVEKGKKIFVQKCAQCHTVEKGGKHKTGPNLHGLFGRKTGQAAGFSYTDANKNKGITWGEDTLMEYLENPKKYIPGTKMIFAGIKKKGERADLIAYLKKAT 103
BLAST of Cytochrome c vs. Ensembl Mouse
Match: Cycs (cytochrome c, somatic [Source:MGI Symbol;Acc:MGI:88578]) HSP 1 Score: 170.244 bits (430), Expect = 5.928e-55 Identity = 78/102 (76.47%), Postives = 90/102 (88.24%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 134 GNVTKGKSLFVQRCSQCHTVEKGGAHKTGPNLNGLFGRKTGQAPGYDYTAANKNKGIVWGPDTLFEYLHDPRKYIPGTKMVFAGLKKEKERADIIAYLKDAT 439 G+V KGK +FVQ+C+QCHTVEKGG HKTGPNL+GLFGRKTGQA G+ YT ANKNKGI WG DTL EYL +P+KYIPGTKM+FAG+KK+ ERAD+IAYLK AT Sbjct: 2 GDVEKGKKIFVQKCAQCHTVEKGGKHKTGPNLHGLFGRKTGQAAGFSYTDANKNKGITWGEDTLMEYLENPKKYIPGTKMIFAGIKKKGERADLIAYLKKAT 103
BLAST of Cytochrome c vs. Ensembl Mouse
Match: Cyct (cytochrome c, testis [Source:MGI Symbol;Acc:MGI:88579]) HSP 1 Score: 162.925 bits (411), Expect = 5.224e-52 Identity = 72/102 (70.59%), Postives = 86/102 (84.31%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 134 GNVTKGKSLFVQRCSQCHTVEKGGAHKTGPNLNGLFGRKTGQAPGYDYTAANKNKGIVWGPDTLFEYLHDPRKYIPGTKMVFAGLKKEKERADIIAYLKDAT 439 G+ GK +FVQ+C+QCHTVEKGG HKTGPNL GLFGRKTGQAPG+ YT ANKNKG++W +TL EYL +P+KYIPGTKM+FAG+KK+ ER D+I YLK AT Sbjct: 2 GDAEAGKKIFVQKCAQCHTVEKGGKHKTGPNLWGLFGRKTGQAPGFSYTDANKNKGVIWSEETLMEYLENPKKYIPGTKMIFAGIKKKSEREDLIKYLKQAT 103
BLAST of Cytochrome c vs. UniProt/SwissProt
Match: sp|P00018|CYC_DRONO (Cytochrome c OS=Dromaius novaehollandiae OX=8790 GN=CYC PE=1 SV=2) HSP 1 Score: 177.563 bits (449), Expect = 6.237e-57 Identity = 80/102 (78.43%), Postives = 91/102 (89.22%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 134 GNVTKGKSLFVQRCSQCHTVEKGGAHKTGPNLNGLFGRKTGQAPGYDYTAANKNKGIVWGPDTLFEYLHDPRKYIPGTKMVFAGLKKEKERADIIAYLKDAT 439 G++ KGK +FVQ+CSQCHTVEKGG HKTGPNLNGLFGRKTGQA G+ YT ANKNKGI WG DTL EYL +P+KYIPGTKM+FAG+KK+ ERAD+IAYLKDAT Sbjct: 2 GDIEKGKKIFVQKCSQCHTVEKGGKHKTGPNLNGLFGRKTGQAEGFSYTDANKNKGITWGEDTLMEYLENPKKYIPGTKMIFAGIKKKSERADLIAYLKDAT 103
BLAST of Cytochrome c vs. UniProt/SwissProt
Match: sp|Q5RFH4|CYC_PONAB (Cytochrome c OS=Pongo abelii OX=9601 GN=CYCS PE=3 SV=3) HSP 1 Score: 176.022 bits (445), Expect = 1.884e-56 Identity = 79/102 (77.45%), Postives = 92/102 (90.20%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 134 GNVTKGKSLFVQRCSQCHTVEKGGAHKTGPNLNGLFGRKTGQAPGYDYTAANKNKGIVWGPDTLFEYLHDPRKYIPGTKMVFAGLKKEKERADIIAYLKDAT 439 G+V KGK +F+ +CSQCHTVEKGG HKTGPNL+GLFGRKTGQAPGY YTAANKNKGI+WG DTL EYL +P+KYIPGTKM+F G+KK++ERAD+IAYLK AT Sbjct: 2 GDVEKGKKIFIMKCSQCHTVEKGGKHKTGPNLHGLFGRKTGQAPGYSYTAANKNKGIIWGEDTLMEYLENPKKYIPGTKMIFVGIKKKEERADLIAYLKKAT 103
BLAST of Cytochrome c vs. UniProt/SwissProt
Match: sp|P99998|CYC_PANTR (Cytochrome c OS=Pan troglodytes OX=9598 GN=CYCS PE=1 SV=2) HSP 1 Score: 176.022 bits (445), Expect = 1.884e-56 Identity = 79/102 (77.45%), Postives = 92/102 (90.20%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 134 GNVTKGKSLFVQRCSQCHTVEKGGAHKTGPNLNGLFGRKTGQAPGYDYTAANKNKGIVWGPDTLFEYLHDPRKYIPGTKMVFAGLKKEKERADIIAYLKDAT 439 G+V KGK +F+ +CSQCHTVEKGG HKTGPNL+GLFGRKTGQAPGY YTAANKNKGI+WG DTL EYL +P+KYIPGTKM+F G+KK++ERAD+IAYLK AT Sbjct: 2 GDVEKGKKIFIMKCSQCHTVEKGGKHKTGPNLHGLFGRKTGQAPGYSYTAANKNKGIIWGEDTLMEYLENPKKYIPGTKMIFVGIKKKEERADLIAYLKKAT 103
BLAST of Cytochrome c vs. UniProt/SwissProt
Match: sp|P99999|CYC_HUMAN (Cytochrome c OS=Homo sapiens OX=9606 GN=CYCS PE=1 SV=2) HSP 1 Score: 176.022 bits (445), Expect = 1.884e-56 Identity = 79/102 (77.45%), Postives = 92/102 (90.20%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 134 GNVTKGKSLFVQRCSQCHTVEKGGAHKTGPNLNGLFGRKTGQAPGYDYTAANKNKGIVWGPDTLFEYLHDPRKYIPGTKMVFAGLKKEKERADIIAYLKDAT 439 G+V KGK +F+ +CSQCHTVEKGG HKTGPNL+GLFGRKTGQAPGY YTAANKNKGI+WG DTL EYL +P+KYIPGTKM+F G+KK++ERAD+IAYLK AT Sbjct: 2 GDVEKGKKIFIMKCSQCHTVEKGGKHKTGPNLHGLFGRKTGQAPGYSYTAANKNKGIIWGEDTLMEYLENPKKYIPGTKMIFVGIKKKEERADLIAYLKKAT 103
BLAST of Cytochrome c vs. UniProt/SwissProt
Match: sp|Q6WUX8|CYC_GORGO (Cytochrome c OS=Gorilla gorilla gorilla OX=9595 GN=CYCS PE=3 SV=3) HSP 1 Score: 176.022 bits (445), Expect = 1.884e-56 Identity = 79/102 (77.45%), Postives = 92/102 (90.20%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 134 GNVTKGKSLFVQRCSQCHTVEKGGAHKTGPNLNGLFGRKTGQAPGYDYTAANKNKGIVWGPDTLFEYLHDPRKYIPGTKMVFAGLKKEKERADIIAYLKDAT 439 G+V KGK +F+ +CSQCHTVEKGG HKTGPNL+GLFGRKTGQAPGY YTAANKNKGI+WG DTL EYL +P+KYIPGTKM+F G+KK++ERAD+IAYLK AT Sbjct: 2 GDVEKGKKIFIMKCSQCHTVEKGGKHKTGPNLHGLFGRKTGQAPGYSYTAANKNKGIIWGEDTLMEYLENPKKYIPGTKMIFVGIKKKEERADLIAYLKKAT 103
BLAST of Cytochrome c vs. TrEMBL
Match: A0A267GGN7 (Cytochrome c domain-containing protein (Fragment) OS=Macrostomum lignano OX=282301 GN=BOX15_Mlig033436g1 PE=3 SV=1) HSP 1 Score: 189.889 bits (481), Expect = 2.536e-59 Identity = 87/106 (82.08%), Postives = 99/106 (93.40%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 125 VPEGNVTKGKSLFVQRCSQCHTVEKGGAHKTGPNLNGLFGRKTGQAPGYDYTAANKNKGIVWGPDTLFEYLHDPRKYIPGTKMVFAGLKKEKERADIIAYLKDATK 442 +P+G+V KGK +F+QRC QCHTVEKGGAHKTGPNLNGLFGRKTGQAPG+ YT ANK+KGI WGPDTLFEYL +P+KYIPGTKMVFAGLKKEK+RAD+IAYLK+ATK Sbjct: 8 IPDGDVEKGKKIFIQRCLQCHTVEKGGAHKTGPNLNGLFGRKTGQAPGFSYTDANKSKGITWGPDTLFEYLLNPKKYIPGTKMVFAGLKKEKDRADLIAYLKEATK 113
BLAST of Cytochrome c vs. TrEMBL
Match: A0A267G6N2 (Cytochrome c domain-containing protein OS=Macrostomum lignano OX=282301 GN=BOX15_Mlig033436g2 PE=3 SV=1) HSP 1 Score: 189.889 bits (481), Expect = 2.904e-59 Identity = 87/106 (82.08%), Postives = 99/106 (93.40%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 125 VPEGNVTKGKSLFVQRCSQCHTVEKGGAHKTGPNLNGLFGRKTGQAPGYDYTAANKNKGIVWGPDTLFEYLHDPRKYIPGTKMVFAGLKKEKERADIIAYLKDATK 442 +P+G+V KGK +F+QRC QCHTVEKGGAHKTGPNLNGLFGRKTGQAPG+ YT ANK+KGI WGPDTLFEYL +P+KYIPGTKMVFAGLKKEK+RAD+IAYLK+ATK Sbjct: 4 IPDGDVEKGKKIFIQRCLQCHTVEKGGAHKTGPNLNGLFGRKTGQAPGFSYTDANKSKGITWGPDTLFEYLLNPKKYIPGTKMVFAGLKKEKDRADLIAYLKEATK 109
BLAST of Cytochrome c vs. TrEMBL
Match: A0A074ZFW7 (Cytochrome OS=Opisthorchis viverrini OX=6198 GN=T265_09703 PE=3 SV=1) HSP 1 Score: 186.422 bits (472), Expect = 5.839e-58 Identity = 86/108 (79.63%), Postives = 98/108 (90.74%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 119 MTVPEGNVTKGKSLFVQRCSQCHTVEKGGAHKTGPNLNGLFGRKTGQAPGYDYTAANKNKGIVWGPDTLFEYLHDPRKYIPGTKMVFAGLKKEKERADIIAYLKDATK 442 MTVPEG+ KGK LFVQRC+QCHTVEKGG+HKTGPNLNGLFGRKTGQAPGY YTAANK+KGI W +TLFEYL +P+KYIPGTKMVFAGLKK ++RA +IAYLK++TK Sbjct: 1 MTVPEGDSEKGKKLFVQRCAQCHTVEKGGSHKTGPNLNGLFGRKTGQAPGYSYTAANKDKGITWTEETLFEYLENPKKYIPGTKMVFAGLKKAEDRAHLIAYLKESTK 108
BLAST of Cytochrome c vs. TrEMBL
Match: A0A4S2MDB7 (Cytochrome c domain-containing protein OS=Opisthorchis felineus OX=147828 GN=CRM22_002248 PE=3 SV=1) HSP 1 Score: 186.037 bits (471), Expect = 8.198e-58 Identity = 85/108 (78.70%), Postives = 98/108 (90.74%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 119 MTVPEGNVTKGKSLFVQRCSQCHTVEKGGAHKTGPNLNGLFGRKTGQAPGYDYTAANKNKGIVWGPDTLFEYLHDPRKYIPGTKMVFAGLKKEKERADIIAYLKDATK 442 MTVPEG+ KGK LFVQRC+QCHTVEKGG+HKTGPNLNGLFGRKTGQAPGY YTAAN++KGI W +TLFEYL +P+KYIPGTKMVFAGLKK +RA++IAYLK++TK Sbjct: 1 MTVPEGDSEKGKKLFVQRCAQCHTVEKGGSHKTGPNLNGLFGRKTGQAPGYSYTAANRDKGITWTEETLFEYLENPKKYIPGTKMVFAGLKKADDRANLIAYLKESTK 108
BLAST of Cytochrome c vs. TrEMBL
Match: A0A419QF28 (Cytochrome c OS=Clonorchis sinensis OX=79923 GN=CSKR_2411s PE=3 SV=1) HSP 1 Score: 185.652 bits (470), Expect = 1.066e-57 Identity = 86/108 (79.63%), Postives = 97/108 (89.81%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 119 MTVPEGNVTKGKSLFVQRCSQCHTVEKGGAHKTGPNLNGLFGRKTGQAPGYDYTAANKNKGIVWGPDTLFEYLHDPRKYIPGTKMVFAGLKKEKERADIIAYLKDATK 442 MTVPEG+ KGK LFVQRC+QCHTVEKGG+HKTGPNLNGLFGRKTGQAPGY YTAANK+KGI W +TLFEYL P+KYIPGTKMVFAGLKK ++RA +IAYLK++TK Sbjct: 1 MTVPEGDSDKGKKLFVQRCAQCHTVEKGGSHKTGPNLNGLFGRKTGQAPGYSYTAANKDKGITWTEETLFEYLESPKKYIPGTKMVFAGLKKAEDRAHLIAYLKESTK 108
BLAST of Cytochrome c vs. Ensembl Cavefish
Match: ENSAMXT00000039245.1 (cytochrome c [Source:NCBI gene;Acc:103040542]) HSP 1 Score: 159.844 bits (403), Expect = 5.668e-51 Identity = 73/102 (71.57%), Postives = 86/102 (84.31%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 134 GNVTKGKSLFVQRCSQCHTVEKGGAHKTGPNLNGLFGRKTGQAPGYDYTAANKNKGIVWGPDTLFEYLHDPRKYIPGTKMVFAGLKKEKERADIIAYLKDAT 439 G+V KGK +FVQ+C+QCHTVE GG HK GPNL GLFGRKTGQA G+ YT ANK+KGI W DTL EYL +P+KYIPGTKM+FAG+KK+ ERAD+IAYLK +T Sbjct: 2 GDVEKGKKVFVQKCAQCHTVENGGKHKVGPNLWGLFGRKTGQAEGFSYTDANKSKGITWNEDTLMEYLENPKKYIPGTKMIFAGIKKKGERADLIAYLKAST 103
BLAST of Cytochrome c vs. Ensembl Sea Lamprey
Match: ENSPMAT00000010092.1 (pep scaffold:Pmarinus_7.0:GL476758:13769:19979:-1 gene:ENSPMAG00000009134.1 transcript:ENSPMAT00000010092.1 gene_biotype:protein_coding transcript_biotype:protein_coding) HSP 1 Score: 166.392 bits (420), Expect = 2.995e-54 Identity = 74/102 (72.55%), Postives = 90/102 (88.24%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 134 GNVTKGKSLFVQRCSQCHTVEKGGAHKTGPNLNGLFGRKTGQAPGYDYTAANKNKGIVWGPDTLFEYLHDPRKYIPGTKMVFAGLKKEKERADIIAYLKDAT 439 G+V KGK +FVQ+CSQCH+VEKGG HKTGPNL+G+FGR+TGQAPG+ YT AN++KGIVW DTLF YL +P+KYIPGTKM+FAG+KKE ER D+IAYLK +T Sbjct: 2 GDVEKGKKVFVQKCSQCHSVEKGGKHKTGPNLSGIFGRQTGQAPGFSYTDANRDKGIVWNEDTLFLYLENPKKYIPGTKMIFAGIKKEGERKDLIAYLKQST 103
BLAST of Cytochrome c vs. Ensembl Sea Lamprey
Match: ENSPMAT00000009796.1 (pep scaffold:Pmarinus_7.0:GL483755:2404:12631:-1 gene:ENSPMAG00000008855.1 transcript:ENSPMAT00000009796.1 gene_biotype:protein_coding transcript_biotype:protein_coding) HSP 1 Score: 165.622 bits (418), Expect = 5.347e-54 Identity = 75/102 (73.53%), Postives = 89/102 (87.25%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 134 GNVTKGKSLFVQRCSQCHTVEKGGAHKTGPNLNGLFGRKTGQAPGYDYTAANKNKGIVWGPDTLFEYLHDPRKYIPGTKMVFAGLKKEKERADIIAYLKDAT 439 G+V KGK +FVQ+C+QCHTVEK G HKTGPNL+GLFGRKTGQAPG+ YT ANK+KGIVW +TLF YL +P+KYIPGTKM+FAG+KKE ER D+IAYLK +T Sbjct: 2 GDVEKGKKVFVQKCAQCHTVEKSGKHKTGPNLSGLFGRKTGQAPGFSYTDANKSKGIVWNEETLFVYLENPKKYIPGTKMIFAGIKKEGERKDLIAYLKKST 103
BLAST of Cytochrome c vs. Ensembl Yeast
Match: CYC1 (Cytochrome c, isoform 1; also known as iso-1-cytochrome c; electron carrier of mitochondrial intermembrane space that transfers electrons from ubiquinone-cytochrome c oxidoreductase to cytochrome c oxidase during cellular respiration; CYC1 has a paralog, CYC7, that arose from the whole genome duplication; human homolog CYC1 can complement yeast null mutant; mutations in human CYC1 cause insulin-responsive hyperglycemia [Source:SGD;Acc:S000003809]) HSP 1 Score: 137.502 bits (345), Expect = 6.215e-43 Identity = 63/101 (62.38%), Postives = 76/101 (75.25%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 134 GNVTKGKSLFVQRCSQCHTVEKGGAHKTGPNLNGLFGRKTGQAPGYDYTAANKNKGIVWGPDTLFEYLHDPRKYIPGTKMVFAGLKKEKERADIIAYLKDA 436 G+ KG +LF RC QCHTVEKGG HK GPNL+G+FGR +GQA GY YT AN K ++W + + EYL +P+KYIPGTKM F GLKKEK+R D+I YLK A Sbjct: 7 GSAKKGATLFKTRCLQCHTVEKGGPHKVGPNLHGIFGRHSGQAEGYSYTDANIKKNVLWDENNMSEYLTNPKKYIPGTKMAFGGLKKEKDRNDLITYLKKA 107
BLAST of Cytochrome c vs. Ensembl Yeast
Match: CYC7 (Cytochrome c isoform 2, expressed under hypoxic conditions; also known as iso-2-cytochrome c; electron carrier of the mitochondrial intermembrane space that transfers electrons from ubiquinone-cytochrome c oxidoreductase to cytochrome c oxidase during cellular respiration; protein abundance increases in response to DNA replication stress; CYC7 has a paralog, CYC1, that arose from the whole genome duplication [Source:SGD;Acc:S000000765]) HSP 1 Score: 136.346 bits (342), Expect = 1.506e-42 Identity = 61/103 (59.22%), Postives = 77/103 (74.76%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 134 GNVTKGKSLFVQRCSQCHTVEKGGAHKTGPNLNGLFGRKTGQAPGYDYTAANKNKGIVWGPDTLFEYLHDPRKYIPGTKMVFAGLKKEKERADIIAYLKDATK 442 G+ KG +LF RC QCHT+E+GG +K GPNL+G+FGR +GQ GY YT AN NK + W D++ EYL +P+KYIPGTKM FAGLKKEK+R D+I Y+ A K Sbjct: 11 GSAKKGATLFKTRCQQCHTIEEGGPNKVGPNLHGIFGRHSGQVKGYSYTDANINKNVKWDEDSMSEYLTNPKKYIPGTKMAFAGLKKEKDRNDLITYMTKAAK 113
BLAST of Cytochrome c vs. Ensembl Nematostella
Match: EDO46857 (Predicted protein [Source:UniProtKB/TrEMBL;Acc:A7RP70]) HSP 1 Score: 160.614 bits (405), Expect = 1.065e-51 Identity = 73/107 (68.22%), Postives = 87/107 (81.31%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 119 MTVPEGNVTKGKSLFVQRCSQCHTVEKGGAHKTGPNLNGLFGRKTGQAPGYDYTAANKNKGIVWGPDTLFEYLHDPRKYIPGTKMVFAGLKKEKERADIIAYLKDAT 439 M++PEG+ TKG +F +CS CHTVE GG HKTGPNL+G+FGRKTGQA GY YT AN KGI W +TLF YL +P+KYIPGTKMVFAG+KK+ ERAD+IAYLK+ T Sbjct: 1 MSIPEGDATKGAKIFKTKCSACHTVEAGGKHKTGPNLHGMFGRKTGQAEGYTYTPANLTKGITWNDETLFVYLENPKKYIPGTKMVFAGIKKKNERADLIAYLKETT 107
BLAST of Cytochrome c vs. Ensembl Nematostella
Match: EDO43318 (Predicted protein [Source:UniProtKB/TrEMBL;Acc:A7RZ03]) HSP 1 Score: 155.992 bits (393), Expect = 7.884e-50 Identity = 71/102 (69.61%), Postives = 83/102 (81.37%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 134 GNVTKGKSLFVQRCSQCHTVEKGGAHKTGPNLNGLFGRKTGQAPGYDYTAANKNKGIVWGPDTLFEYLHDPRKYIPGTKMVFAGLKKEKERADIIAYLKDAT 439 G+ TKG +F +C+QCHTVE GG HKTGPNL+GLFGRKTGQA G+ YT AN+NKGI WG DTL YL +P+KYIPGTKMVFAG+KK+ ER D+IAYLK T Sbjct: 2 GDATKGAKVFKTKCAQCHTVEAGGKHKTGPNLHGLFGRKTGQAEGFSYTTANQNKGITWGEDTLMVYLENPKKYIPGTKMVFAGIKKKNERLDLIAYLKQET 103
BLAST of Cytochrome c vs. Ensembl Medaka
Match: ENSORLT00000023225.2 (cytochrome c iso-1/iso-2 [Source:NCBI gene;Acc:101171965]) HSP 1 Score: 160.229 bits (404), Expect = 4.729e-51 Identity = 73/102 (71.57%), Postives = 86/102 (84.31%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 134 GNVTKGKSLFVQRCSQCHTVEKGGAHKTGPNLNGLFGRKTGQAPGYDYTAANKNKGIVWGPDTLFEYLHDPRKYIPGTKMVFAGLKKEKERADIIAYLKDAT 439 G+V KGK +FVQ+C+QCHTVE+GG HK GPNL GLFGRKTGQAPGY YT ANK+KGI W DTL YL +P+KYIPGTKM+FAG+KK+ ER D+I+YLK AT Sbjct: 2 GDVDKGKKVFVQKCAQCHTVEEGGKHKVGPNLWGLFGRKTGQAPGYSYTDANKSKGITWNEDTLMVYLENPKKYIPGTKMIFAGIKKKGERQDLISYLKSAT 103
BLAST of Cytochrome c vs. Ensembl Medaka
Match: cycsb (cytochrome c iso-1/iso-2 [Source:NCBI gene;Acc:101165110]) HSP 1 Score: 159.844 bits (403), Expect = 6.997e-51 Identity = 71/102 (69.61%), Postives = 86/102 (84.31%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 134 GNVTKGKSLFVQRCSQCHTVEKGGAHKTGPNLNGLFGRKTGQAPGYDYTAANKNKGIVWGPDTLFEYLHDPRKYIPGTKMVFAGLKKEKERADIIAYLKDAT 439 G++ KGK FVQ+C+QCHTVE+GG HK GPNL GLFGR+TGQAPGY YT ANK+KGI+W +TL YL +P+KYIPGTKM+FAG+KK+ ER D+IAYLK AT Sbjct: 3 GDIEKGKKAFVQKCAQCHTVEQGGKHKVGPNLWGLFGRQTGQAPGYSYTDANKSKGIIWNEETLMIYLENPKKYIPGTKMIFAGIKKKNERVDLIAYLKSAT 104
BLAST of Cytochrome c vs. Planmine SMEST
Match: SMESG000045852.1 (SMESG000045852.1) HSP 1 Score: 225.713 bits (574), Expect = 5.284e-77 Identity = 108/108 (100.00%), Postives = 108/108 (100.00%), Query Frame = 2 Query: 119 MTVPEGNVTKGKSLFVQRCSQCHTVEKGGAHKTGPNLNGLFGRKTGQAPGYDYTAANKNKGIVWGPDTLFEYLHDPRKYIPGTKMVFAGLKKEKERADIIAYLKDATK 442 MTVPEGNVTKGKSLFVQRCSQCHTVEKGGAHKTGPNLNGLFGRKTGQAPGYDYTAANKNKGIVWGPDTLFEYLHDPRKYIPGTKMVFAGLKKEKERADIIAYLKDATK Sbjct: 1 MTVPEGNVTKGKSLFVQRCSQCHTVEKGGAHKTGPNLNGLFGRKTGQAPGYDYTAANKNKGIVWGPDTLFEYLHDPRKYIPGTKMVFAGLKKEKERADIIAYLKDATK 108 The following BLAST results are available for this feature:
BLAST of Cytochrome c vs. Ensembl Human
Analysis Date: 2016-08-08 (Schmidtea mediterranea smed_20140614 BLASTX Human e!99) Total hits: 4
BLAST of Cytochrome c vs. Ensembl Celegans
Analysis Date: 2020-05-01 (Schmidtea mediterranea smed_20140614 BLASTX Celegan e!99) Total hits: 4
BLAST of Cytochrome c vs. Ensembl Fly
Analysis Date: 2020-05-01 (Schmidtea mediterranea smed_20140614 BLASTX Drosophila e!99) Total hits: 4
BLAST of Cytochrome c vs. Ensembl Zebrafish
Analysis Date: 2016-08-08 (Schmidtea mediterranea smed_20140614 BLASTX Zebrafish e!99) Total hits: 2
BLAST of Cytochrome c vs. Ensembl Xenopus
Analysis Date: 2020-05-01 (Schmidtea mediterranea smed_20140614 BLASTX Xenopus e!99) Total hits: 2
BLAST of Cytochrome c vs. Ensembl Mouse
Analysis Date: 2020-05-01 (Schmidtea mediterranea smed_20140614 BLASTX Mouse e!99) Total hits: 3
BLAST of Cytochrome c vs. UniProt/SwissProt
Analysis Date: 2020-05-01 (Schmidtea mediterranea smed_20140614 BLASTX EMBL-EBI UniProt) Total hits: 5
BLAST of Cytochrome c vs. TrEMBL
Analysis Date: 2020-05-01 (Schmidtea mediterranea smed_20140614 BLASTX EMBL-EBI TrEMBL) Total hits: 5
BLAST of Cytochrome c vs. Ensembl Cavefish
Analysis Date: 2020-05-08 (Schmidtea mediterranea smed_20140614 BLASTX Cavefish e!99) Total hits: 1
BLAST of Cytochrome c vs. Ensembl Sea Lamprey
Analysis Date: 2020-05-08 (Schmidtea mediterranea smed_20140614 BLASTX Sea Lamprey e!99) Total hits: 2
BLAST of Cytochrome c vs. Ensembl Yeast
Analysis Date: 2020-05-08 (Schmidtea mediterranea smed_20140614 BLASTX Yeast e!Fungi46) Total hits: 2
BLAST of Cytochrome c vs. Ensembl Nematostella
Analysis Date: 2020-05-08 (Schmidtea mediterranea smed_20140614 BLASTX Nematostella e!Metazoa46) Total hits: 2
BLAST of Cytochrome c vs. Ensembl Medaka
Analysis Date: 2020-05-08 (Schmidtea mediterranea smed_20140614 BLASTX Medaka e!99) Total hits: 2
BLAST of Cytochrome c vs. Planmine SMEST
Analysis Date: 2020-05-08 (Schmidtea mediterranea smed_20140614 BLASTX Planmine SMEST) Total hits: 1
Analyses
This transcript is derived from or has results from the following analyses Sequences
The following sequences are available for this feature:
transcript sequence >SMED30021332 ID=SMED30021332|Name=Cytochrome c|organism=Schmidtea mediterranea sexual|type=transcript|length=540bpback to top protein sequence of SMED30021332-orf-1 >SMED30021332-orf-1 ID=SMED30021332-orf-1|Name=SMED30021332-orf-1|organism=Schmidtea mediterranea sexual|type=polypeptide|length=109bp MTVPEGNVTKGKSLFVQRCSQCHTVEKGGAHKTGPNLNGLFGRKTGQAPGback to top Annotated Terms
The following terms have been associated with this transcript:
InterPro
Analysis Name: Schmidtea mediteranean smed_20140614 Interproscan
Date Performed: 2020-05-01
|