Polycomb group ring finger 2
Overview
Neoblast Clusters
Zeng et. al., 2018▻ Overview▻ Neoblast Population▻ Sub-lethal Irradiated Surviving X1 and X2 Cell Population
Overview
Single cell RNA-seq of pluripotent neoblasts and its early progeniesWe isolated X1 neoblasts cells enriched in high piwi-1 expression (Neoblast Population), and profiled ∼7,614 individual cells via scRNA-seq. Unsupervised analyses uncovered 12 distinct classes from 7,088 high-quality cells. We designated these classes Nb1 to Nb12 and ordered them based on high (Nb1) to low (Nb12) piwi-1 expression levels. We further defined groups of genes that best classified the cells parsed into 12 distinct cell clusters to generate a scaled expression heat map of discriminative gene sets for each cluster. Expression of each cluster’s gene signatures was validated using multiplex fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) co-stained with piwi-1 and largely confirmed the cell clusters revealed by scRNA-seq.We also tested sub-lethal irradiation exposure. To profile rare pluripotent stem cells (PSCs) and avoid interference from immediate progenitor cells, we determined a time point after sub-lethal irradiation (7 DPI) with minimal piwi-1+ cells, followed by isolation and single-cell RNA-seq of 1,200 individual cells derived from X1 (Piwi-1 high) and X2 (Piwi-1 low) cell populations (Sub-lethal Irradiated Surviving X1 and X2 Cell Population)Explore this single cell expression dataset with our NB Cluster Shiny App
Neoblast Population
Sub-lethal Irradiated Surviving X1 and X2 Cell Population
Embryonic Expression
Davies et. al., 2017
Hover the mouse over a column in the graph to view average RPKM values per sample. Embryonic Stages: Y: yolk. S2-S8: Stages 2-8. C4: asexual adult. SX: virgin, sexually mature adult. back to top Anatomical Expression
PAGE et. al., 2020SMED30005538 has been reported as being expressed in these anatomical structures and/or regions. Read more about PAGEPAGE Curations: 1
Homology
BLAST of Polycomb group ring finger 2 vs. Ensembl Human
Match: PCGF2 (polycomb group ring finger 2 [Source:HGNC Symbol;Acc:HGNC:12929]) HSP 1 Score: 117.087 bits (292), Expect = 3.686e-30 Identity = 77/237 (32.49%), Postives = 113/237 (47.68%), Query Frame = 1 Query: 52 SKVKLSVLNAHLICALCGGYLIDPTMLTQCLHTFCKSCIFKYLEHNRYCPLCQCLIQETRMGKVSLKPDLILQKAIYKLVPNLLKSEMQNINYFYQNEEL-------NENEFNVSSVEXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXTYKQKVTSENKXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXDILTNLIDKIVMENG---------IFLLCSTQIKVDQVKKLILNKYHLNPHEYVTSLWYNDDCLNSDYTLSEIMFM 714 +++K++ LN HL+CALCGGY ID T + +CLH+FCK+CI +YLE N+YCP+C + +TR +S++ D LQ +YKLVP L K EM+ FY L NE+ V EK L ++ Y+ + K K +ENG FL C + V + K + NK + P +Y + Y D+ L YTL +I ++ Sbjct: 5 TRIKITELNPHLMCALCGGYFIDATTIVECLHSFCKTCIVRYLETNKYCPMCDVQVHKTRP-LLSIRSDKTLQDIVYKLVPGLFKDEMKRRRDFYAAYPLTEVPNGSNEDRGEVLEQEKGALSDDEIVSLSIEFYEGARDRDEK-------------------------KGPLENGDGDKEKTGVRFLRCPAAMTVMHLAKFLRNKMDV-PSKYKVEVLYEDEPLKEYYTLMDIAYI 214
BLAST of Polycomb group ring finger 2 vs. Ensembl Human
Match: PCGF2 (polycomb group ring finger 2 [Source:HGNC Symbol;Acc:HGNC:12929]) HSP 1 Score: 117.087 bits (292), Expect = 3.686e-30 Identity = 77/237 (32.49%), Postives = 113/237 (47.68%), Query Frame = 1 Query: 52 SKVKLSVLNAHLICALCGGYLIDPTMLTQCLHTFCKSCIFKYLEHNRYCPLCQCLIQETRMGKVSLKPDLILQKAIYKLVPNLLKSEMQNINYFYQNEEL-------NENEFNVSSVEXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXTYKQKVTSENKXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXDILTNLIDKIVMENG---------IFLLCSTQIKVDQVKKLILNKYHLNPHEYVTSLWYNDDCLNSDYTLSEIMFM 714 +++K++ LN HL+CALCGGY ID T + +CLH+FCK+CI +YLE N+YCP+C + +TR +S++ D LQ +YKLVP L K EM+ FY L NE+ V EK L ++ Y+ + K K +ENG FL C + V + K + NK + P +Y + Y D+ L YTL +I ++ Sbjct: 5 TRIKITELNPHLMCALCGGYFIDATTIVECLHSFCKTCIVRYLETNKYCPMCDVQVHKTRP-LLSIRSDKTLQDIVYKLVPGLFKDEMKRRRDFYAAYPLTEVPNGSNEDRGEVLEQEKGALSDDEIVSLSIEFYEGARDRDEK-------------------------KGPLENGDGDKEKTGVRFLRCPAAMTVMHLAKFLRNKMDV-PSKYKVEVLYEDEPLKEYYTLMDIAYI 214
BLAST of Polycomb group ring finger 2 vs. Ensembl Human
Match: PCGF2 (polycomb group ring finger 2 [Source:HGNC Symbol;Acc:HGNC:12929]) HSP 1 Score: 117.087 bits (292), Expect = 3.686e-30 Identity = 77/237 (32.49%), Postives = 113/237 (47.68%), Query Frame = 1 Query: 52 SKVKLSVLNAHLICALCGGYLIDPTMLTQCLHTFCKSCIFKYLEHNRYCPLCQCLIQETRMGKVSLKPDLILQKAIYKLVPNLLKSEMQNINYFYQNEEL-------NENEFNVSSVEXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXTYKQKVTSENKXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXDILTNLIDKIVMENG---------IFLLCSTQIKVDQVKKLILNKYHLNPHEYVTSLWYNDDCLNSDYTLSEIMFM 714 +++K++ LN HL+CALCGGY ID T + +CLH+FCK+CI +YLE N+YCP+C + +TR +S++ D LQ +YKLVP L K EM+ FY L NE+ V EK L ++ Y+ + K K +ENG FL C + V + K + NK + P +Y + Y D+ L YTL +I ++ Sbjct: 5 TRIKITELNPHLMCALCGGYFIDATTIVECLHSFCKTCIVRYLETNKYCPMCDVQVHKTRP-LLSIRSDKTLQDIVYKLVPGLFKDEMKRRRDFYAAYPLTEVPNGSNEDRGEVLEQEKGALSDDEIVSLSIEFYEGARDRDEK-------------------------KGPLENGDGDKEKTGVRFLRCPAAMTVMHLAKFLRNKMDV-PSKYKVEVLYEDEPLKEYYTLMDIAYI 214
BLAST of Polycomb group ring finger 2 vs. Ensembl Human
Match: PCGF2 (polycomb group ring finger 2 [Source:HGNC Symbol;Acc:HGNC:12929]) HSP 1 Score: 117.087 bits (292), Expect = 3.686e-30 Identity = 77/237 (32.49%), Postives = 113/237 (47.68%), Query Frame = 1 Query: 52 SKVKLSVLNAHLICALCGGYLIDPTMLTQCLHTFCKSCIFKYLEHNRYCPLCQCLIQETRMGKVSLKPDLILQKAIYKLVPNLLKSEMQNINYFYQNEEL-------NENEFNVSSVEXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXTYKQKVTSENKXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXDILTNLIDKIVMENG---------IFLLCSTQIKVDQVKKLILNKYHLNPHEYVTSLWYNDDCLNSDYTLSEIMFM 714 +++K++ LN HL+CALCGGY ID T + +CLH+FCK+CI +YLE N+YCP+C + +TR +S++ D LQ +YKLVP L K EM+ FY L NE+ V EK L ++ Y+ + K K +ENG FL C + V + K + NK + P +Y + Y D+ L YTL +I ++ Sbjct: 5 TRIKITELNPHLMCALCGGYFIDATTIVECLHSFCKTCIVRYLETNKYCPMCDVQVHKTRP-LLSIRSDKTLQDIVYKLVPGLFKDEMKRRRDFYAAYPLTEVPNGSNEDRGEVLEQEKGALSDDEIVSLSIEFYEGARDRDEK-------------------------KGPLENGDGDKEKTGVRFLRCPAAMTVMHLAKFLRNKMDV-PSKYKVEVLYEDEPLKEYYTLMDIAYI 214
BLAST of Polycomb group ring finger 2 vs. Ensembl Human
Match: PCGF2 (polycomb group ring finger 2 [Source:HGNC Symbol;Acc:HGNC:12929]) HSP 1 Score: 117.087 bits (292), Expect = 3.686e-30 Identity = 77/237 (32.49%), Postives = 113/237 (47.68%), Query Frame = 1 Query: 52 SKVKLSVLNAHLICALCGGYLIDPTMLTQCLHTFCKSCIFKYLEHNRYCPLCQCLIQETRMGKVSLKPDLILQKAIYKLVPNLLKSEMQNINYFYQNEEL-------NENEFNVSSVEXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXTYKQKVTSENKXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXDILTNLIDKIVMENG---------IFLLCSTQIKVDQVKKLILNKYHLNPHEYVTSLWYNDDCLNSDYTLSEIMFM 714 +++K++ LN HL+CALCGGY ID T + +CLH+FCK+CI +YLE N+YCP+C + +TR +S++ D LQ +YKLVP L K EM+ FY L NE+ V EK L ++ Y+ + K K +ENG FL C + V + K + NK + P +Y + Y D+ L YTL +I ++ Sbjct: 5 TRIKITELNPHLMCALCGGYFIDATTIVECLHSFCKTCIVRYLETNKYCPMCDVQVHKTRP-LLSIRSDKTLQDIVYKLVPGLFKDEMKRRRDFYAAYPLTEVPNGSNEDRGEVLEQEKGALSDDEIVSLSIEFYEGARDRDEK-------------------------KGPLENGDGDKEKTGVRFLRCPAAMTVMHLAKFLRNKMDV-PSKYKVEVLYEDEPLKEYYTLMDIAYI 214
BLAST of Polycomb group ring finger 2 vs. Ensembl Celegans
Match: mig-32 (pep chromosome:WBcel235:IV:12089247:12092213:-1 gene:WBGene00008684.1 transcript:F11A10.3a.2 gene_biotype:protein_coding transcript_biotype:protein_coding gene_symbol:mig-32) HSP 1 Score: 62.7734 bits (151), Expect = 6.013e-11 Identity = 25/56 (44.64%), Postives = 33/56 (58.93%), Query Frame = 1 Query: 55 KVKLSVLNAHLICALCGGYLIDPTMLTQCLHTFCKSCIFKYLEH-NRYCPLCQCLI 219 K + VLN + C +C GY++D T + C+HTFCKSC+ Y E N CP C I Sbjct: 317 KYNMEVLNPFITCGICDGYIVDATTIIDCMHTFCKSCLLTYFESDNNTCPTCGTFI 372
BLAST of Polycomb group ring finger 2 vs. Ensembl Celegans
Match: mig-32 (pep chromosome:WBcel235:IV:12089286:12092213:-1 gene:WBGene00008684.1 transcript:F11A10.3a.1 gene_biotype:protein_coding transcript_biotype:protein_coding gene_symbol:mig-32) HSP 1 Score: 62.7734 bits (151), Expect = 6.013e-11 Identity = 25/56 (44.64%), Postives = 33/56 (58.93%), Query Frame = 1 Query: 55 KVKLSVLNAHLICALCGGYLIDPTMLTQCLHTFCKSCIFKYLEH-NRYCPLCQCLI 219 K + VLN + C +C GY++D T + C+HTFCKSC+ Y E N CP C I Sbjct: 317 KYNMEVLNPFITCGICDGYIVDATTIIDCMHTFCKSCLLTYFESDNNTCPTCGTFI 372
BLAST of Polycomb group ring finger 2 vs. Ensembl Fly
Match: l(3)73Ah (gene:FBgn0002283 transcript:FBtr0307336) HSP 1 Score: 92.0485 bits (227), Expect = 3.835e-22 Identity = 42/101 (41.58%), Postives = 63/101 (62.38%), Query Frame = 1 Query: 52 SKVKLSVLNAHLICALCGGYLIDPTMLTQCLHTFCKSCIFKYLEHNRYCPLCQCLIQETR-MGKVSLKPDLILQKAIYKLVPNLLKSEMQNINYFYQNEEL 351 +VKL +N H+ C +CGGY ID T +T+CLHTFCKSC+ K+LE + CP C +I ++ + +S D +Q +YKLVP L + E + FY++ + Sbjct: 3 RRVKLKTINPHITCKICGGYFIDATTVTECLHTFCKSCLVKHLEEKKTCPTCDNIIHQSHPLQYISF--DRTMQDIVYKLVPKLQEDESRRERDFYKSRNM 101
BLAST of Polycomb group ring finger 2 vs. Ensembl Fly
Match: l(3)73Ah (gene:FBgn0002283 transcript:FBtr0075311) HSP 1 Score: 92.0485 bits (227), Expect = 3.835e-22 Identity = 42/101 (41.58%), Postives = 63/101 (62.38%), Query Frame = 1 Query: 52 SKVKLSVLNAHLICALCGGYLIDPTMLTQCLHTFCKSCIFKYLEHNRYCPLCQCLIQETR-MGKVSLKPDLILQKAIYKLVPNLLKSEMQNINYFYQNEEL 351 +VKL +N H+ C +CGGY ID T +T+CLHTFCKSC+ K+LE + CP C +I ++ + +S D +Q +YKLVP L + E + FY++ + Sbjct: 3 RRVKLKTINPHITCKICGGYFIDATTVTECLHTFCKSCLVKHLEEKKTCPTCDNIIHQSHPLQYISF--DRTMQDIVYKLVPKLQEDESRRERDFYKSRNM 101
BLAST of Polycomb group ring finger 2 vs. Ensembl Fly
Match: Psc (gene:FBgn0005624 transcript:FBtr0087798) HSP 1 Score: 93.9745 bits (232), Expect = 2.631e-21 Identity = 40/95 (42.11%), Postives = 59/95 (62.11%), Query Frame = 1 Query: 58 VKLSVLNAHLICALCGGYLIDPTMLTQCLHTFCKSCIFKYLEHNRYCPLCQCLIQETRMGKVSLKPDLILQKAIYKLVPNLLKSEMQNINYFYQN 342 V L+ +N H+IC LC GYLI+ T + +CLH+FC SC+ +L R+CP C+ +I K ++K D LQ +YKLVP L + E+ FY++ Sbjct: 252 VLLTAVNPHIICHLCQGYLINATTIVECLHSFCHSCLINHLRKERFCPRCEMVINN---AKPNIKSDTTLQAIVYKLVPGLYERELMRKRAFYKD 343
BLAST of Polycomb group ring finger 2 vs. Ensembl Fly
Match: Psc (gene:FBgn0005624 transcript:FBtr0345196) HSP 1 Score: 93.9745 bits (232), Expect = 2.631e-21 Identity = 40/95 (42.11%), Postives = 59/95 (62.11%), Query Frame = 1 Query: 58 VKLSVLNAHLICALCGGYLIDPTMLTQCLHTFCKSCIFKYLEHNRYCPLCQCLIQETRMGKVSLKPDLILQKAIYKLVPNLLKSEMQNINYFYQN 342 V L+ +N H+IC LC GYLI+ T + +CLH+FC SC+ +L R+CP C+ +I K ++K D LQ +YKLVP L + E+ FY++ Sbjct: 252 VLLTAVNPHIICHLCQGYLINATTIVECLHSFCHSCLINHLRKERFCPRCEMVINN---AKPNIKSDTTLQAIVYKLVPGLYERELMRKRAFYKD 343
BLAST of Polycomb group ring finger 2 vs. Ensembl Fly
Match: Psc (gene:FBgn0005624 transcript:FBtr0345375) HSP 1 Score: 93.9745 bits (232), Expect = 2.631e-21 Identity = 40/95 (42.11%), Postives = 59/95 (62.11%), Query Frame = 1 Query: 58 VKLSVLNAHLICALCGGYLIDPTMLTQCLHTFCKSCIFKYLEHNRYCPLCQCLIQETRMGKVSLKPDLILQKAIYKLVPNLLKSEMQNINYFYQN 342 V L+ +N H+IC LC GYLI+ T + +CLH+FC SC+ +L R+CP C+ +I K ++K D LQ +YKLVP L + E+ FY++ Sbjct: 252 VLLTAVNPHIICHLCQGYLINATTIVECLHSFCHSCLINHLRKERFCPRCEMVINN---AKPNIKSDTTLQAIVYKLVPGLYERELMRKRAFYKD 343
BLAST of Polycomb group ring finger 2 vs. Ensembl Zebrafish
Match: pcgf1 (polycomb group ring finger 1 [Source:NCBI gene;Acc:368900]) HSP 1 Score: 108.227 bits (269), Expect = 7.354e-28 Identity = 51/101 (50.50%), Postives = 70/101 (69.31%), Query Frame = 1 Query: 55 KVKLSVLNAHLICALCGGYLIDPTMLTQCLHTFCKSCIFKYLEHNRYCPLCQCLIQETRMGKVSLKPDLILQKAIYKLVPNLLKSEMQNINYFYQNEELNE 357 K+K+ LN H++C LC GY ID T +T+CLHTFCKSCI KYL+ ++YCP+C I ET+ ++LK D ++Q +YKLVP L +SE + I FYQ+ L Sbjct: 16 KIKIKDLNEHIVCYLCAGYFIDATTITECLHTFCKSCIVKYLQTSKYCPMCNIKIHETQ-PLLNLKLDRVMQDIVYKLVPGLQESEDKRIKEFYQSRGLER 115
BLAST of Polycomb group ring finger 2 vs. Ensembl Zebrafish
Match: pcgf1 (polycomb group ring finger 1 [Source:NCBI gene;Acc:368900]) HSP 1 Score: 108.997 bits (271), Expect = 1.024e-27 Identity = 52/106 (49.06%), Postives = 71/106 (66.98%), Query Frame = 1 Query: 40 NNNLSKVKLSVLNAHLICALCGGYLIDPTMLTQCLHTFCKSCIFKYLEHNRYCPLCQCLIQETRMGKVSLKPDLILQKAIYKLVPNLLKSEMQNINYFYQNEELNE 357 N K+K+ LN H++C LC GY ID T +T+CLHTFCKSCI KYL+ ++YCP+C I ET+ ++LK D ++Q +YKLVP L +SE + I FYQ+ L Sbjct: 62 NEEEVKIKIKDLNEHIVCYLCAGYFIDATTITECLHTFCKSCIVKYLQTSKYCPMCNIKIHETQ-PLLNLKLDRVMQDIVYKLVPGLQESEDKRIKEFYQSRGLER 166
BLAST of Polycomb group ring finger 2 vs. Ensembl Zebrafish
Match: bmi1a (bmi1 polycomb ring finger oncogene 1a [Source:NCBI gene;Acc:321505]) HSP 1 Score: 105.145 bits (261), Expect = 5.386e-26 Identity = 65/228 (28.51%), Postives = 110/228 (48.25%), Query Frame = 1 Query: 52 SKVKLSVLNAHLICALCGGYLIDPTMLTQCLHTFCKSCIFKYLEHNRYCPLCQCLIQETRMGKVSLKPDLILQKAIYKLVPNLLKSEMQNINYFYQNEE-------LNENEFNVSSVEXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXTYKQKVTSENKXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXDILTNLIDKIVMENGIFLLCSTQIKVDQVKKLILNKYHLNPHEYVTSLWYNDDCLNSDYTLSEIMFM 714 +++K++ LN HL+C LCGGY ID T + +CLH+FCK CI +YLE ++YCP+C + +T+ ++++ D LQ +YKLVP L K+EM+ FY NE+ V+ +K + ++ + + + T K + N +L C + V ++K + +K + P Y + Y D+ L YTL +I ++ Sbjct: 7 TRIKITELNPHLMCVLCGGYFIDATTIIECLHSFCKMCIVRYLETSKYCPICDVQVHKTK-PLLNIRSDKTLQDIVYKLVPGLFKNEMKRRRDFYAEHPSVDAANGSNEDRGEVADEDKRIITDDEIISLSIEFFDHRAQQQG--------------------CTEERQKEEVNNKRYLQCPAAMTVMHLRKFLRSKMDIPP-TYQIEVMYEDEPLKDYYTLMDIAYI 212
BLAST of Polycomb group ring finger 2 vs. Ensembl Zebrafish
Match: bmi1a (bmi1 polycomb ring finger oncogene 1a [Source:NCBI gene;Acc:321505]) HSP 1 Score: 105.145 bits (261), Expect = 5.386e-26 Identity = 65/228 (28.51%), Postives = 110/228 (48.25%), Query Frame = 1 Query: 52 SKVKLSVLNAHLICALCGGYLIDPTMLTQCLHTFCKSCIFKYLEHNRYCPLCQCLIQETRMGKVSLKPDLILQKAIYKLVPNLLKSEMQNINYFYQNEE-------LNENEFNVSSVEXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXTYKQKVTSENKXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXDILTNLIDKIVMENGIFLLCSTQIKVDQVKKLILNKYHLNPHEYVTSLWYNDDCLNSDYTLSEIMFM 714 +++K++ LN HL+C LCGGY ID T + +CLH+FCK CI +YLE ++YCP+C + +T+ ++++ D LQ +YKLVP L K+EM+ FY NE+ V+ +K + ++ + + + T K + N +L C + V ++K + +K + P Y + Y D+ L YTL +I ++ Sbjct: 7 TRIKITELNPHLMCVLCGGYFIDATTIIECLHSFCKMCIVRYLETSKYCPICDVQVHKTK-PLLNIRSDKTLQDIVYKLVPGLFKNEMKRRRDFYAEHPSVDAANGSNEDRGEVADEDKRIITDDEIISLSIEFFDHRAQQQG--------------------CTEERQKEEVNNKRYLQCPAAMTVMHLRKFLRSKMDIPP-TYQIEVMYEDEPLKDYYTLMDIAYI 212
BLAST of Polycomb group ring finger 2 vs. Ensembl Zebrafish
Match: bmi1b (bmi1 polycomb ring finger oncogene 1b [Source:NCBI gene;Acc:394249]) HSP 1 Score: 104.76 bits (260), Expect = 7.723e-26 Identity = 48/114 (42.11%), Postives = 73/114 (64.04%), Query Frame = 1 Query: 52 SKVKLSVLNAHLICALCGGYLIDPTMLTQCLHTFCKSCIFKYLEHNRYCPLCQCLIQETRMGKVSLKPDLILQKAIYKLVPNLLKSEMQNINYFYQNEEL------NENEFNVS 375 +++K++ LN HL+C LCGGY ID T + +CLH+FCK CI +YLE ++YCP+C + +T+ ++++ D LQ +YKLVP L K+EM+ FY + NE+ VS Sbjct: 5 TRIKITELNPHLMCVLCGGYFIDATTIVECLHSFCKMCIVRYLETSKYCPICDVQVHKTKP-LLNIRSDKTLQDIVYKLVPGLFKNEMKRRRDFYAEHPVDATNGSNEDRGEVS 117
BLAST of Polycomb group ring finger 2 vs. Ensembl Xenopus
Match: qprt (quinolinate phosphoribosyltransferase [Source:Xenbase;Acc:XB-GENE-5897181]) HSP 1 Score: 108.997 bits (271), Expect = 2.047e-27 Identity = 64/221 (28.96%), Postives = 112/221 (50.68%), Query Frame = 1 Query: 52 SKVKLSVLNAHLICALCGGYLIDPTMLTQCLHTFCKSCIFKYLEHNRYCPLCQCLIQETRMGKVSLKPDLILQKAIYKLVPNLLKSEMQNINYFYQNEELNENEFNVSSVEXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXTYKQKVTSENKXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXDILTNLIDKIVMENGIFLLCSTQIKVDQVKKLILNKYHLNPHEYVTSLWYNDDCLNSDYTLSEIMFM 714 +++K++ LN HL+C LCGGY ID T + +CLH+FCK+CI +YLE ++YCP+C + +TR ++++ D LQ +YKLVP L K EM+ FY + + N S+ + + +V E+K + D + N + + + +L C + V ++K + +K + P + + Y ++ L YTL +I ++ Sbjct: 5 TRIKITELNPHLMCVLCGGYFIDATTIIECLHSFCKTCIVRYLETSKYCPICDVQVHKTRP-LLNIRADKTLQDIVYKLVPGLFKGEMKRRRDFYAAHP-SADASNGSNED-----------------RGEVADEDK------------RIITDDEIINPMWPLTANDKRYLRCPAALTVMHLRKFLRSKMDI-PSNFQIDVMYEEEPLKDYYTLMDIAYI 193
BLAST of Polycomb group ring finger 2 vs. Ensembl Xenopus
Match: vta1 (vesicle (multivesicular body) trafficking 1 [Source:Xenbase;Acc:XB-GENE-984112]) HSP 1 Score: 107.842 bits (268), Expect = 6.363e-27 Identity = 68/231 (29.44%), Postives = 116/231 (50.22%), Query Frame = 1 Query: 55 KVKLSVLNAHLICALCGGYLIDPTMLTQCLHTFCKSCIFKYLEHNRYCPLCQCLIQETRMGKVSLKPDLILQKAIYKLVPNLLKSEMQNINYFYQNEELNENEFNVSSVEXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXTYKQKVTSENKXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXDILTNLIDKIVME--NGI-FLLCSTQIKVDQVKKLILNKYHLNPHEYVTSLWYNDDCLNSDYTLSEIMFMNKLEYPDG 738 ++K++ LN HL+CALCGGY ID + +CLH+FCK+CI +YLE +++CP+C + + R +S++ D LQ +YKLVP L + EM+ FY + +++ + +K+ SE+ + D + +L+D +E N + FL C + + + K + NK + P +Y + Y ++ L YTL +I ++ YP G Sbjct: 6 RIKMTELNPHLMCALCGGYFIDAATIVECLHSFCKTCILRYLEAHKFCPMCDSQVHKGRP-LLSIRSDKTLQDIVYKLVPGLFRDEMKRRRDFYASYSRSKDSSSAEQGQKVLEAGEAPVQEEENISLSIQFSED----------------ARDEIQDLVDSEDLEKRNSLRFLRCPAAMTITHLAKFLRNKMDV-PSKYKVEILYEEEPLKDYYTLMDIAYI----YPWG 214
BLAST of Polycomb group ring finger 2 vs. Ensembl Xenopus
Match: qprt (quinolinate phosphoribosyltransferase [Source:Xenbase;Acc:XB-GENE-5897181]) HSP 1 Score: 107.457 bits (267), Expect = 8.673e-27 Identity = 45/95 (47.37%), Postives = 67/95 (70.53%), Query Frame = 1 Query: 52 SKVKLSVLNAHLICALCGGYLIDPTMLTQCLHTFCKSCIFKYLEHNRYCPLCQCLIQETRMGKVSLKPDLILQKAIYKLVPNLLKSEMQNINYFY 336 +++K++ LN HL+C LCGGY ID T + +CLH+FCK+CI +YLE ++YCP+C + +TR ++++ D LQ +YKLVP L K EM+ FY Sbjct: 5 TRIKITELNPHLMCVLCGGYFIDATTIIECLHSFCKTCIVRYLETSKYCPICDVQVHKTRP-LLNIRADKTLQDIVYKLVPGLFKGEMKRRRDFY 98
BLAST of Polycomb group ring finger 2 vs. Ensembl Xenopus
Match: vta1 (vesicle (multivesicular body) trafficking 1 [Source:Xenbase;Acc:XB-GENE-984112]) HSP 1 Score: 104.375 bits (259), Expect = 1.342e-25 Identity = 43/94 (45.74%), Postives = 65/94 (69.15%), Query Frame = 1 Query: 55 KVKLSVLNAHLICALCGGYLIDPTMLTQCLHTFCKSCIFKYLEHNRYCPLCQCLIQETRMGKVSLKPDLILQKAIYKLVPNLLKSEMQNINYFY 336 ++K++ LN HL+CALCGGY ID + +CLH+FCK+CI +YLE +++CP+C + + R +S++ D LQ +YKLVP L + EM+ FY Sbjct: 6 RIKMTELNPHLMCALCGGYFIDAATIVECLHSFCKTCILRYLEAHKFCPMCDSQVHKGR-PLLSIRSDKTLQDIVYKLVPGLFRDEMKRRRDFY 98
BLAST of Polycomb group ring finger 2 vs. Ensembl Xenopus
Match: pcgf3 (polycomb group ring finger 3 [Source:NCBI gene;Acc:549601]) HSP 1 Score: 97.0561 bits (240), Expect = 1.651e-23 Identity = 45/96 (46.88%), Postives = 63/96 (65.62%), Query Frame = 1 Query: 52 SKVKLSVLNAHLICALCGGYLIDPTMLTQCLHTFCKSCIFKYLEHNRYCPLCQCLIQETRMGKVSLKPDLILQKAIYKLVPNLLKSEMQNINYFYQ 339 K+KL +NAH+ C LC GYLID T +T+CLHTFC+SC+ KYLE N CP C+ +I ++ + + D +Q +YKLVP L ++EM+ FY Sbjct: 4 RKIKLWDINAHITCRLCNGYLIDATTVTECLHTFCRSCLVKYLEENNTCPTCRIVIHQSHPLQY-IGHDRTMQDIVYKLVPGLQEAEMRKQREFYH 98
BLAST of Polycomb group ring finger 2 vs. Ensembl Mouse
Match: Pcgf2 (polycomb group ring finger 2 [Source:MGI Symbol;Acc:MGI:99161]) HSP 1 Score: 119.783 bits (299), Expect = 2.919e-31 Identity = 78/229 (34.06%), Postives = 115/229 (50.22%), Query Frame = 1 Query: 52 SKVKLSVLNAHLICALCGGYLIDPTMLTQCLHTFCKSCIFKYLEHNRYCPLCQCLIQETRMGKVSLKPDLILQKAIYKLVPNLLKSEMQNINYFYQNEEL-------NENEFNVSSVEXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXTYKQKVTSENKXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXDILTNLIDKIVMENGI-FLLCSTQIKVDQVKKLILNKYHLNPHEYVTSLWYNDDCLNSDYTLSEIMFM 714 +++K++ LN HL+CALCGGY ID T + +CLH+FCK+CI +YLE N+YCP+C + +TR +S++ D LQ +YKLVP L K EM+ FY L NE+ V EK L ++ Y+ E K + LT D + G+ FL C + V + K + NK + P +Y + Y D+ L YTL +I ++ Sbjct: 5 TRIKITELNPHLMCALCGGYFIDATTIVECLHSFCKTCIVRYLETNKYCPMCDVQVHKTRP-LLSIRSDKTLQDIVYKLVPGLFKDEMKRRRDFYAAYPLTEVPNGSNEDRGEVLEQEKGALGDDEIVSLSIEFYEGVRDREEKKN-----------------LTENGDGDKEKTGVRFLRCPAAMTVMHLAKFLRNKMDV-PSKYKVEILYEDEPLKEYYTLMDIAYI 214
BLAST of Polycomb group ring finger 2 vs. Ensembl Mouse
Match: Pcgf2 (polycomb group ring finger 2 [Source:MGI Symbol;Acc:MGI:99161]) HSP 1 Score: 119.783 bits (299), Expect = 2.919e-31 Identity = 78/229 (34.06%), Postives = 115/229 (50.22%), Query Frame = 1 Query: 52 SKVKLSVLNAHLICALCGGYLIDPTMLTQCLHTFCKSCIFKYLEHNRYCPLCQCLIQETRMGKVSLKPDLILQKAIYKLVPNLLKSEMQNINYFYQNEEL-------NENEFNVSSVEXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXTYKQKVTSENKXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXDILTNLIDKIVMENGI-FLLCSTQIKVDQVKKLILNKYHLNPHEYVTSLWYNDDCLNSDYTLSEIMFM 714 +++K++ LN HL+CALCGGY ID T + +CLH+FCK+CI +YLE N+YCP+C + +TR +S++ D LQ +YKLVP L K EM+ FY L NE+ V EK L ++ Y+ E K + LT D + G+ FL C + V + K + NK + P +Y + Y D+ L YTL +I ++ Sbjct: 5 TRIKITELNPHLMCALCGGYFIDATTIVECLHSFCKTCIVRYLETNKYCPMCDVQVHKTRP-LLSIRSDKTLQDIVYKLVPGLFKDEMKRRRDFYAAYPLTEVPNGSNEDRGEVLEQEKGALGDDEIVSLSIEFYEGVRDREEKKN-----------------LTENGDGDKEKTGVRFLRCPAAMTVMHLAKFLRNKMDV-PSKYKVEILYEDEPLKEYYTLMDIAYI 214
BLAST of Polycomb group ring finger 2 vs. Ensembl Mouse
Match: Pcgf2 (polycomb group ring finger 2 [Source:MGI Symbol;Acc:MGI:99161]) HSP 1 Score: 119.783 bits (299), Expect = 2.919e-31 Identity = 78/229 (34.06%), Postives = 115/229 (50.22%), Query Frame = 1 Query: 52 SKVKLSVLNAHLICALCGGYLIDPTMLTQCLHTFCKSCIFKYLEHNRYCPLCQCLIQETRMGKVSLKPDLILQKAIYKLVPNLLKSEMQNINYFYQNEEL-------NENEFNVSSVEXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXTYKQKVTSENKXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXDILTNLIDKIVMENGI-FLLCSTQIKVDQVKKLILNKYHLNPHEYVTSLWYNDDCLNSDYTLSEIMFM 714 +++K++ LN HL+CALCGGY ID T + +CLH+FCK+CI +YLE N+YCP+C + +TR +S++ D LQ +YKLVP L K EM+ FY L NE+ V EK L ++ Y+ E K + LT D + G+ FL C + V + K + NK + P +Y + Y D+ L YTL +I ++ Sbjct: 5 TRIKITELNPHLMCALCGGYFIDATTIVECLHSFCKTCIVRYLETNKYCPMCDVQVHKTRP-LLSIRSDKTLQDIVYKLVPGLFKDEMKRRRDFYAAYPLTEVPNGSNEDRGEVLEQEKGALGDDEIVSLSIEFYEGVRDREEKKN-----------------LTENGDGDKEKTGVRFLRCPAAMTVMHLAKFLRNKMDV-PSKYKVEILYEDEPLKEYYTLMDIAYI 214
BLAST of Polycomb group ring finger 2 vs. Ensembl Mouse
Match: Pcgf2 (polycomb group ring finger 2 [Source:MGI Symbol;Acc:MGI:99161]) HSP 1 Score: 119.783 bits (299), Expect = 2.919e-31 Identity = 78/229 (34.06%), Postives = 115/229 (50.22%), Query Frame = 1 Query: 52 SKVKLSVLNAHLICALCGGYLIDPTMLTQCLHTFCKSCIFKYLEHNRYCPLCQCLIQETRMGKVSLKPDLILQKAIYKLVPNLLKSEMQNINYFYQNEEL-------NENEFNVSSVEXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXTYKQKVTSENKXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXDILTNLIDKIVMENGI-FLLCSTQIKVDQVKKLILNKYHLNPHEYVTSLWYNDDCLNSDYTLSEIMFM 714 +++K++ LN HL+CALCGGY ID T + +CLH+FCK+CI +YLE N+YCP+C + +TR +S++ D LQ +YKLVP L K EM+ FY L NE+ V EK L ++ Y+ E K + LT D + G+ FL C + V + K + NK + P +Y + Y D+ L YTL +I ++ Sbjct: 5 TRIKITELNPHLMCALCGGYFIDATTIVECLHSFCKTCIVRYLETNKYCPMCDVQVHKTRP-LLSIRSDKTLQDIVYKLVPGLFKDEMKRRRDFYAAYPLTEVPNGSNEDRGEVLEQEKGALGDDEIVSLSIEFYEGVRDREEKKN-----------------LTENGDGDKEKTGVRFLRCPAAMTVMHLAKFLRNKMDV-PSKYKVEILYEDEPLKEYYTLMDIAYI 214
BLAST of Polycomb group ring finger 2 vs. Ensembl Mouse
Match: Bmi1 (Bmi1 polycomb ring finger oncogene [Source:MGI Symbol;Acc:MGI:88174]) HSP 1 Score: 107.457 bits (267), Expect = 2.247e-28 Identity = 45/95 (47.37%), Postives = 68/95 (71.58%), Query Frame = 1 Query: 52 SKVKLSVLNAHLICALCGGYLIDPTMLTQCLHTFCKSCIFKYLEHNRYCPLCQCLIQETRMGKVSLKPDLILQKAIYKLVPNLLKSEMQNINYFY 336 +++K++ LN HL+C LCGGY ID T + +CLH+FCK+CI +YLE ++YCP+C + +TR ++++ D LQ +YKLVP L K+EM+ FY Sbjct: 5 TRIKITELNPHLMCVLCGGYFIDATTIIECLHSFCKTCIVRYLETSKYCPICDVQVHKTR-PLLNIRSDKTLQDIVYKLVPGLFKNEMKRRRDFY 98
BLAST of Polycomb group ring finger 2 vs. UniProt/SwissProt
Match: sp|P23798|PCGF2_MOUSE (Polycomb group RING finger protein 2 OS=Mus musculus OX=10090 GN=Pcgf2 PE=1 SV=2) HSP 1 Score: 119.783 bits (299), Expect = 2.042e-30 Identity = 78/229 (34.06%), Postives = 115/229 (50.22%), Query Frame = 1 Query: 52 SKVKLSVLNAHLICALCGGYLIDPTMLTQCLHTFCKSCIFKYLEHNRYCPLCQCLIQETRMGKVSLKPDLILQKAIYKLVPNLLKSEMQNINYFYQNEEL-------NENEFNVSSVEXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXTYKQKVTSENKXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXDILTNLIDKIVMENGI-FLLCSTQIKVDQVKKLILNKYHLNPHEYVTSLWYNDDCLNSDYTLSEIMFM 714 +++K++ LN HL+CALCGGY ID T + +CLH+FCK+CI +YLE N+YCP+C + +TR +S++ D LQ +YKLVP L K EM+ FY L NE+ V EK L ++ Y+ E K + LT D + G+ FL C + V + K + NK + P +Y + Y D+ L YTL +I ++ Sbjct: 5 TRIKITELNPHLMCALCGGYFIDATTIVECLHSFCKTCIVRYLETNKYCPMCDVQVHKTRP-LLSIRSDKTLQDIVYKLVPGLFKDEMKRRRDFYAAYPLTEVPNGSNEDRGEVLEQEKGALGDDEIVSLSIEFYEGVRDREEKKN-----------------LTENGDGDKEKTGVRFLRCPAAMTVMHLAKFLRNKMDV-PSKYKVEILYEDEPLKEYYTLMDIAYI 214
BLAST of Polycomb group ring finger 2 vs. UniProt/SwissProt
Match: sp|P35227|PCGF2_HUMAN (Polycomb group RING finger protein 2 OS=Homo sapiens OX=9606 GN=PCGF2 PE=1 SV=1) HSP 1 Score: 117.087 bits (292), Expect = 1.770e-29 Identity = 77/237 (32.49%), Postives = 113/237 (47.68%), Query Frame = 1 Query: 52 SKVKLSVLNAHLICALCGGYLIDPTMLTQCLHTFCKSCIFKYLEHNRYCPLCQCLIQETRMGKVSLKPDLILQKAIYKLVPNLLKSEMQNINYFYQNEEL-------NENEFNVSSVEXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXTYKQKVTSENKXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXDILTNLIDKIVMENG---------IFLLCSTQIKVDQVKKLILNKYHLNPHEYVTSLWYNDDCLNSDYTLSEIMFM 714 +++K++ LN HL+CALCGGY ID T + +CLH+FCK+CI +YLE N+YCP+C + +TR +S++ D LQ +YKLVP L K EM+ FY L NE+ V EK L ++ Y+ + K K +ENG FL C + V + K + NK + P +Y + Y D+ L YTL +I ++ Sbjct: 5 TRIKITELNPHLMCALCGGYFIDATTIVECLHSFCKTCIVRYLETNKYCPMCDVQVHKTRP-LLSIRSDKTLQDIVYKLVPGLFKDEMKRRRDFYAAYPLTEVPNGSNEDRGEVLEQEKGALSDDEIVSLSIEFYEGARDRDEK-------------------------KGPLENGDGDKEKTGVRFLRCPAAMTVMHLAKFLRNKMDV-PSKYKVEVLYEDEPLKEYYTLMDIAYI 214
BLAST of Polycomb group ring finger 2 vs. UniProt/SwissProt
Match: sp|Q4QR06|PCGF1_XENLA (Polycomb group RING finger protein 1 OS=Xenopus laevis OX=8355 GN=pcgf1 PE=2 SV=2) HSP 1 Score: 109.383 bits (272), Expect = 2.791e-27 Identity = 56/115 (48.70%), Postives = 75/115 (65.22%), Query Frame = 1 Query: 40 NNNLSKVKLSVLNAHLICALCGGYLIDPTMLTQCLHTFCKSCIFKYLEHNRYCPLCQCLIQETRMGKVSLKPDLILQKAIYKLVPNLLKSEMQNINYFYQNEELNENEFNVSSVE 384 N + KVK+ LN H++C LC GY ID T +T+CLHTFCKSCI KYL+ ++YCPLC I ET+ ++LK D ++Q +YKLVP L ++E I FY + L E S+VE Sbjct: 28 NEEVVKVKIKELNEHIVCYLCAGYFIDATTITECLHTFCKSCIVKYLQTSKYCPLCNIKIHETQ-PLLNLKLDRVMQDIVYKLVPGLQENEDSRIRDFYHSRGL-ERVLQPSAVE 140
BLAST of Polycomb group ring finger 2 vs. UniProt/SwissProt
Match: sp|Q28H21|PCGF1_XENTR (Polycomb group RING finger protein 1 OS=Xenopus tropicalis OX=8364 GN=pcgf1 PE=2 SV=1) HSP 1 Score: 108.997 bits (271), Expect = 4.285e-27 Identity = 56/115 (48.70%), Postives = 75/115 (65.22%), Query Frame = 1 Query: 40 NNNLSKVKLSVLNAHLICALCGGYLIDPTMLTQCLHTFCKSCIFKYLEHNRYCPLCQCLIQETRMGKVSLKPDLILQKAIYKLVPNLLKSEMQNINYFYQNEELNENEFNVSSVE 384 N + KVK+ LN H++C LC GY ID T +T+CLHTFCKSCI KYL+ ++YCPLC I ET+ ++LK D ++Q +YKLVP L ++E I FY + L E S+VE Sbjct: 28 NEEVVKVKIKELNEHIVCYLCAGYFIDATTITECLHTFCKSCIVKYLQTSKYCPLCNIKIHETQ-PLLNLKLDRVMQDIVYKLVPGLQENEDGRIRDFYHSRGL-ERVLQPSAVE 140
BLAST of Polycomb group ring finger 2 vs. UniProt/SwissProt
Match: sp|Q7ZYZ7|PCGF1_DANRE (Polycomb group RING finger protein 1 OS=Danio rerio OX=7955 GN=pcgf1 PE=3 SV=1) HSP 1 Score: 108.997 bits (271), Expect = 4.761e-27 Identity = 52/106 (49.06%), Postives = 71/106 (66.98%), Query Frame = 1 Query: 40 NNNLSKVKLSVLNAHLICALCGGYLIDPTMLTQCLHTFCKSCIFKYLEHNRYCPLCQCLIQETRMGKVSLKPDLILQKAIYKLVPNLLKSEMQNINYFYQNEELNE 357 N K+K+ LN H++C LC GY ID T +T+CLHTFCKSCI KYL+ ++YCP+C I ET+ ++LK D ++Q +YKLVP L +SE + I FYQ+ L Sbjct: 28 NEEEVKIKIKDLNEHIVCYLCAGYFIDATTITECLHTFCKSCIVKYLQTSKYCPMCNIKIHETQ-PLLNLKLDRVMQDIVYKLVPGLQESEDKRIKEFYQSRGLER 132
BLAST of Polycomb group ring finger 2 vs. TrEMBL
Match: G7YJ33 (Polycomb group RING finger protein 2 (Fragment) OS=Clonorchis sinensis OX=79923 GN=CLF_109230 PE=4 SV=1) HSP 1 Score: 137.887 bits (346), Expect = 2.485e-37 Identity = 66/119 (55.46%), Postives = 83/119 (69.75%), Query Frame = 1 Query: 37 MNNNLSKVKLSVLNAHLICALCGGYLIDPTMLTQCLHTFCKSCIFKYLEHNRYCPLCQCLIQETRMGKVSLKPDLILQKAIYKLVPNLLKSEMQNINYF---------YQNEELNENEF 366 M+ + VKLS LN HLIC LCGGYLID T+LT+C+H FC+SCI KYL ++ CPLCQ LIQETR G +L+PD +LQ+ +YKLVP LLK+EMQ + F QN +ENE+ Sbjct: 1 MSFTGANVKLSTLNGHLICGLCGGYLIDATVLTECVHVFCRSCIVKYLTEHKVCPLCQSLIQETRPGH-ALRPDTVLQRVVYKLVPGLLKTEMQRLTEFCSSMSASETLQNTRASENEY 118
BLAST of Polycomb group ring finger 2 vs. TrEMBL
Match: A0A183W0Y8 (RING-type domain-containing protein OS=Trichobilharzia regenti OX=157069 GN=TRE_LOCUS6394 PE=4 SV=1) HSP 1 Score: 139.043 bits (349), Expect = 6.496e-35 Identity = 61/99 (61.62%), Postives = 78/99 (78.79%), Query Frame = 1 Query: 37 MNNNLSKVKLSVLNAHLICALCGGYLIDPTMLTQCLHTFCKSCIFKYLEHNRYCPLCQCLIQETRMGKVSLKPDLILQKAIYKLVPNLLKSEMQNINYF 333 M + S VKLS +N HLIC LCGGYLID T+LT+C+H FC+SCI KYL N+ CPLCQ L+QETR G+ +L+PD+ LQ+ +YKLVP LLK+EM+ I+ F Sbjct: 1 MTTSYSGVKLSSINGHLICGLCGGYLIDATVLTECIHVFCRSCILKYLSENKICPLCQSLVQETRPGQ-ALRPDVALQRIVYKLVPGLLKTEMKRISEF 98
BLAST of Polycomb group ring finger 2 vs. TrEMBL
Match: A0A075A7N0 (RING-type domain-containing protein (Fragment) OS=Opisthorchis viverrini OX=6198 GN=T265_12935 PE=4 SV=1) HSP 1 Score: 139.428 bits (350), Expect = 7.937e-35 Identity = 65/123 (52.85%), Postives = 87/123 (70.73%), Query Frame = 1 Query: 37 MNNNLSKVKLSVLNAHLICALCGGYLIDPTMLTQCLHTFCKSCIFKYLEHNRYCPLCQCLIQETRMGKVSLKPDLILQKAIYKLVPNLLKSEMQNINYF---------YQNEELNENEFNVSS 378 M+ + VKLS LN HLIC LCGGYLID T+LT+C+H FC+SCI KYL ++ CPLCQ LIQETR G +L+PD +LQ+ +YKLVP LLK+EMQ + F Q+ + +ENE+++ + Sbjct: 1 MSFTGANVKLSTLNGHLICGLCGGYLIDATVLTECVHVFCRSCIVKYLTEHKVCPLCQSLIQETRPGH-ALRPDTVLQRVVYKLVPGLLKTEMQRLTEFCSSMSASETMQSTQASENEYSLGT 122
BLAST of Polycomb group ring finger 2 vs. TrEMBL
Match: A0A4S2M8E6 (RING-type domain-containing protein OS=Opisthorchis felineus OX=147828 GN=CRM22_001950 PE=4 SV=1) HSP 1 Score: 137.502 bits (345), Expect = 1.914e-34 Identity = 64/116 (55.17%), Postives = 83/116 (71.55%), Query Frame = 1 Query: 37 MNNNLSKVKLSVLNAHLICALCGGYLIDPTMLTQCLHTFCKSCIFKYLEHNRYCPLCQCLIQETRMGKVSLKPDLILQKAIYKLVPNLLKSEMQNINYFYQNEELNENEFNVSSVE 384 M+ + VKLS LN HLIC LCGGYLID T+LT+C+H FC+SCI KYL ++ CPLCQ LIQETR G +L+PD +LQ+ +YKLVP LLK+EMQ + F + +E +V + E Sbjct: 1 MSFTGANVKLSTLNGHLICGLCGGYLIDATVLTECVHVFCRSCIVKYLTEHKVCPLCQSLIQETRPGH-ALRPDTVLQRVVYKLVPGLLKTEMQRLTEFCSSMSASETMQSVHAPE 115
BLAST of Polycomb group ring finger 2 vs. TrEMBL
Match: A0A183K3Y2 (RING-type domain-containing protein OS=Schistosoma curassoni OX=6186 GN=SCUD_LOCUS9700 PE=4 SV=1) HSP 1 Score: 134.035 bits (336), Expect = 4.366e-33 Identity = 60/99 (60.61%), Postives = 78/99 (78.79%), Query Frame = 1 Query: 37 MNNNLSKVKLSVLNAHLICALCGGYLIDPTMLTQCLHTFCKSCIFKYLEHNRYCPLCQCLIQETRMGKVSLKPDLILQKAIYKLVPNLLKSEMQNINYF 333 M ++ VKLS +N HLIC LCGGYLID T+LT+C+H FC+SCI KYL ++ CPLCQ LIQETR G+ +L+PD+ LQ+ +YKLVP LLK+EM+ I+ F Sbjct: 1 MTSSYPGVKLSSINGHLICGLCGGYLIDATVLTECIHVFCRSCILKYLLEHKICPLCQSLIQETRPGQ-ALRPDVALQRIVYKLVPGLLKTEMKRISEF 98
BLAST of Polycomb group ring finger 2 vs. Ensembl Cavefish
Match: pcgf1 (polycomb group ring finger 1 [Source:NCBI gene;Acc:103047474]) HSP 1 Score: 108.612 bits (270), Expect = 4.708e-28 Identity = 52/106 (49.06%), Postives = 71/106 (66.98%), Query Frame = 1 Query: 40 NNNLSKVKLSVLNAHLICALCGGYLIDPTMLTQCLHTFCKSCIFKYLEHNRYCPLCQCLIQETRMGKVSLKPDLILQKAIYKLVPNLLKSEMQNINYFYQNEELNE 357 N K+K+ LN H++C LC GY ID T +T+CLHTFCKSCI KYL+ ++YCP+C I ET+ ++LK D ++Q +YKLVP L +SE + I FYQ+ L Sbjct: 28 NEEEVKIKIKDLNEHIVCYLCAGYFIDATTITECLHTFCKSCIVKYLQTSKYCPMCNIKIHETQ-PLLNLKLDRVMQDIVYKLVPGLQESEDKRIREFYQSRGLER 132
BLAST of Polycomb group ring finger 2 vs. Ensembl Cavefish
Match: pcgf1 (polycomb group ring finger 1 [Source:NCBI gene;Acc:103047474]) HSP 1 Score: 108.227 bits (269), Expect = 7.143e-28 Identity = 51/101 (50.50%), Postives = 70/101 (69.31%), Query Frame = 1 Query: 55 KVKLSVLNAHLICALCGGYLIDPTMLTQCLHTFCKSCIFKYLEHNRYCPLCQCLIQETRMGKVSLKPDLILQKAIYKLVPNLLKSEMQNINYFYQNEELNE 357 K+K+ LN H++C LC GY ID T +T+CLHTFCKSCI KYL+ ++YCP+C I ET+ ++LK D ++Q +YKLVP L +SE + I FYQ+ L Sbjct: 16 KIKIKDLNEHIVCYLCAGYFIDATTITECLHTFCKSCIVKYLQTSKYCPMCNIKIHETQ-PLLNLKLDRVMQDIVYKLVPGLQESEDKRIREFYQSRGLER 115
BLAST of Polycomb group ring finger 2 vs. Ensembl Cavefish
Match: bmi1a (BMI1 proto-oncogene, polycomb ring finger [Source:NCBI gene;Acc:103025408]) HSP 1 Score: 104.375 bits (259), Expect = 7.402e-26 Identity = 45/95 (47.37%), Postives = 67/95 (70.53%), Query Frame = 1 Query: 52 SKVKLSVLNAHLICALCGGYLIDPTMLTQCLHTFCKSCIFKYLEHNRYCPLCQCLIQETRMGKVSLKPDLILQKAIYKLVPNLLKSEMQNINYFY 336 +++K++ LN HL+C LCGGY ID T + +CLH+FCK CI +YLE ++YCP+C + +T+ ++++ D LQ +YKLVP L KSEM+ FY Sbjct: 7 TRIKITELNPHLMCVLCGGYFIDATTIIECLHSFCKMCIVRYLETSKYCPICDVQVHKTK-PLLNIRSDKTLQDIVYKLVPGLFKSEMKRRRDFY 100
BLAST of Polycomb group ring finger 2 vs. Ensembl Cavefish
Match: bmi1b (polycomb complex protein BMI-1-B-like [Source:NCBI gene;Acc:103034194]) HSP 1 Score: 104.375 bits (259), Expect = 1.094e-25 Identity = 44/95 (46.32%), Postives = 67/95 (70.53%), Query Frame = 1 Query: 52 SKVKLSVLNAHLICALCGGYLIDPTMLTQCLHTFCKSCIFKYLEHNRYCPLCQCLIQETRMGKVSLKPDLILQKAIYKLVPNLLKSEMQNINYFY 336 +++K++ LN HL+C LCGGY ID T + +CLH+FCK CI +YLE ++YCP+C + +T+ ++++ D LQ +YKLVP L K+EM+ FY Sbjct: 7 TRIKITELNPHLMCVLCGGYFIDATTIVECLHSFCKMCIVRYLETSKYCPICDVQVHKTKP-LLNIRSDKTLQDIVYKLVPGLFKNEMKRRRDFY 100
BLAST of Polycomb group ring finger 2 vs. Ensembl Cavefish
Match: PCGF3 (polycomb group ring finger 3 [Source:NCBI gene;Acc:103041260]) HSP 1 Score: 96.2857 bits (238), Expect = 2.331e-23 Identity = 45/95 (47.37%), Postives = 64/95 (67.37%), Query Frame = 1 Query: 55 KVKLSVLNAHLICALCGGYLIDPTMLTQCLHTFCKSCIFKYLEHNRYCPLCQCLIQETRMGKVSLKPDLILQKAIYKLVPNLLKSEMQNINYFYQ 339 K+KL +NAH+ C LC GYLID T +T+CLHTFC+SC+ KYLE N CP C+ +I ++ + + D +Q +YKLVP L ++E++ FYQ Sbjct: 13 KIKLWDINAHITCRLCEGYLIDATTVTECLHTFCRSCLVKYLEENNTCPTCRIVIHQSHPLQY-IGHDRTMQDIVYKLVPGLQEAELRKQRDFYQ 106
BLAST of Polycomb group ring finger 2 vs. Ensembl Sea Lamprey
Match: bmi1b (bmi1 polycomb ring finger oncogene 1b [Source:NCBI gene;Acc:394249]) HSP 1 Score: 108.612 bits (270), Expect = 3.821e-29 Identity = 68/224 (30.36%), Postives = 110/224 (49.11%), Query Frame = 1 Query: 43 NNLSKVKLSVLNAHLICALCGGYLIDPTMLTQCLHTFCKSCIFKYLEHNRYCPLCQCLIQETRMGKVSLKPDLILQKAIYKLVPNLLKSEMQNINYFYQNEELNENEFNVSSVEXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXTYKQKVTSENKXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXDILTNLIDKI-VMENG-----IFLLCSTQIKVDQVKKLILNKYHLNPHEYVTSLWYNDDCLNSDYTL 696 + + ++++ LN HLIC LCGGY ID T +T+CLH+FCK+CI +YLE +++CP+C + +TR ++L+ D LQ +YKLVP L K EM+ FY + SS + +V E+K + S + ++ + V +NG +L C + V ++K + NK + PH Y + + ++ L YTL Sbjct: 2 HRTTHIRMTELNPHLICVLCGGYFIDATSITECLHSFCKTCIVRYLESSKFCPVCDVQVHKTR-PLLNLRSDKTLQDIVYKLVPGLFKDEMKRRRDFYAGHPEGDGCKGDSS-----------------EARGEVADEDKQNIADDEIISLSIEYTEGPPSSDKGRSEVKQNGEELRKRYLRCPAAMTVMHLQKFLRNKMEI-PHSYQIEVLHEEESLKDYYTL 206
BLAST of Polycomb group ring finger 2 vs. Ensembl Sea Lamprey
Match: pcgf1 (polycomb group ring finger 1 [Source:NCBI gene;Acc:368900]) HSP 1 Score: 104.76 bits (260), Expect = 4.673e-27 Identity = 48/100 (48.00%), Postives = 69/100 (69.00%), Query Frame = 1 Query: 58 VKLSVLNAHLICALCGGYLIDPTMLTQCLHTFCKSCIFKYLEHNRYCPLCQCLIQETRMGKVSLKPDLILQKAIYKLVPNLLKSEMQNINYFYQNEELNE 357 VK+ LN H++C LC GY +D T +T+CLHTFCKSCI KYL+ +++CP+C I ET+ ++LK D ++Q+ +YKLVP L E + I FYQ+ L+ Sbjct: 34 VKIKDLNEHIVCILCAGYFVDATTITECLHTFCKSCIVKYLQTSKHCPMCNIKIHETQ-PLLNLKLDRVMQEIVYKLVPGLQNDEERRIREFYQSRGLDR 132
BLAST of Polycomb group ring finger 2 vs. Ensembl Sea Lamprey
Match: PCGF3 (polycomb group ring finger 3 [Source:HGNC Symbol;Acc:HGNC:10066]) HSP 1 Score: 95.5153 bits (236), Expect = 3.735e-25 Identity = 46/100 (46.00%), Postives = 64/100 (64.00%), Query Frame = 1 Query: 55 KVKLSVLNAHLICALCGGYLIDPTMLTQCLHTFCKSCIFKYLEHNRYCPLCQCLIQETRMGKVSLKPDLILQKAIYKLVPNLLKSEMQNINYFYQNEELN 354 K+KL LNAH+ C LC GYLID T +T+CLHTFCKSC+ +YLE + CP C+ +I ++ + + D +Q +YKLVP L ++EM+ FY L Sbjct: 5 KLKLRELNAHITCPLCRGYLIDATTVTECLHTFCKSCLVRYLEDHNTCPTCKIVIHQSHPTQY-IGHDRTMQDIVYKLVPGLQEAEMKRQREFYWTRGLE 103
BLAST of Polycomb group ring finger 2 vs. Ensembl Sea Lamprey
Match: pcgf6 (polycomb group ring finger 6 [Source:ZFIN;Acc:ZDB-GENE-060526-178]) HSP 1 Score: 85.1149 bits (209), Expect = 4.837e-20 Identity = 40/98 (40.82%), Postives = 64/98 (65.31%), Query Frame = 1 Query: 58 VKLSVLNAHLICALCGGYLIDPTMLTQCLHTFCKSCIFKYLEHNRYCPLCQCLIQETRMGKVSLKPDLILQKAIYKLVPNLLKSEMQNINYFYQNEEL 351 V L +N+ + C LC GYL+D T +T+CLHTFCKSCI K+ +++ CP C ++ +T+ +++ D +Q +YKLVPNL ++E + + FY + L Sbjct: 4 VSLVDVNSFITCYLCKGYLVDATTITECLHTFCKSCIVKHFDYSNRCPQCNVVVHQTQ-PLYNIRSDGTMQDIVYKLVPNLEENEKRRMRDFYLSRGL 100
BLAST of Polycomb group ring finger 2 vs. Ensembl Sea Lamprey
Match: pcgf5b (polycomb group ring finger 5b [Source:NCBI gene;Acc:692252]) HSP 1 Score: 82.8037 bits (203), Expect = 4.686e-19 Identity = 42/110 (38.18%), Postives = 66/110 (60.00%), Query Frame = 1 Query: 49 LSKVKLSVLNAHLICALCGGYLIDPTMLTQCLHTFCKSCIFKYLEHNRYCPLCQCLIQETRMGKVSLKPDLILQKAIYKLVPNLLKSEMQNINYFY---QNEELNENEFN 369 + + + LN + C+LC GYLI PT +T+CLHTFCKSCI ++ E + CP C + ET ++ L+ D L++ I+KL+P L + E + F+ +N+E +E N Sbjct: 4 VRRARARDLNPFVTCSLCRGYLIKPTAVTECLHTFCKSCIVQHFEESNECPKCGIQVHETNPLEM-LRQDKTLEEIIFKLIPGLRECEEKRERDFWNAQRNQEYRNDEEN 112
BLAST of Polycomb group ring finger 2 vs. Ensembl Nematostella
Match: EDO43600 (Predicted protein [Source:UniProtKB/TrEMBL;Acc:A7RY97]) HSP 1 Score: 85.1149 bits (209), Expect = 2.810e-21 Identity = 39/88 (44.32%), Postives = 58/88 (65.91%), Query Frame = 1 Query: 49 LSKVKLSVLNAHLICALCGGYLIDPTMLTQCLHTFCKSCIFKYLEHNRYCPLCQCLIQETRMGKVSLKPDLILQKAIYKLVPNLLKSE 312 L + L LN H+IC LCGGYL+D T + +CLH+FC+ CI +YLE + CP+C I +TR ++++ D +LQ +YK+VP + E Sbjct: 2 LRTLSLKELNPHIICVLCGGYLVDATTIIECLHSFCRCCIVRYLETSYRCPVCDAEIHKTR-PLLNIRADNVLQDIVYKVVPGMYFGE 88
BLAST of Polycomb group ring finger 2 vs. Ensembl Nematostella
Match: EDO43598 (Predicted protein [Source:UniProtKB/TrEMBL;Acc:A7RY97]) HSP 1 Score: 85.1149 bits (209), Expect = 2.810e-21 Identity = 39/88 (44.32%), Postives = 58/88 (65.91%), Query Frame = 1 Query: 49 LSKVKLSVLNAHLICALCGGYLIDPTMLTQCLHTFCKSCIFKYLEHNRYCPLCQCLIQETRMGKVSLKPDLILQKAIYKLVPNLLKSE 312 L + L LN H+IC LCGGYL+D T + +CLH+FC+ CI +YLE + CP+C I +TR ++++ D +LQ +YK+VP + E Sbjct: 2 LRTLSLKELNPHIICVLCGGYLVDATTIIECLHSFCRCCIVRYLETSYRCPVCDAEIHKTR-PLLNIRADNVLQDIVYKVVPGMYFGE 88
BLAST of Polycomb group ring finger 2 vs. Ensembl Nematostella
Match: EDO43596 (Predicted protein [Source:UniProtKB/TrEMBL;Acc:A7RY94]) HSP 1 Score: 84.3445 bits (207), Expect = 5.737e-21 Identity = 38/88 (43.18%), Postives = 58/88 (65.91%), Query Frame = 1 Query: 49 LSKVKLSVLNAHLICALCGGYLIDPTMLTQCLHTFCKSCIFKYLEHNRYCPLCQCLIQETRMGKVSLKPDLILQKAIYKLVPNLLKSE 312 L + L LN H+IC LCGGYL+D T + +CLH+FC+ CI +YL+ + CP+C I +TR ++++ D +LQ +YK+VP + E Sbjct: 2 LRTLSLKELNPHIICVLCGGYLVDATTIIECLHSFCRGCIVRYLDTSYRCPVCDAEIHKTR-PLLNIRADNVLQDIVYKVVPGMYFGE 88
BLAST of Polycomb group ring finger 2 vs. Ensembl Nematostella
Match: EDO37122 (Predicted protein [Source:UniProtKB/TrEMBL;Acc:A7SGN9]) HSP 1 Score: 85.8853 bits (211), Expect = 1.055e-20 Identity = 45/102 (44.12%), Postives = 62/102 (60.78%), Query Frame = 1 Query: 55 KVKLSVLNAHLICALCGGYLIDPTMLTQCLHTFCKSCIFKYLEHNRY--CPLCQCLIQETRMGKVSLKPDLILQKAIYKLVPNLLKSEMQNINYFYQNEELN 354 K++L LN H+ C LC GYLI PT +T+CLHTFC+SCI + CP C LI ET ++ L+ D L+ IYKLVP L + E++ FY++ L+ Sbjct: 3 KLQLRELNPHITCGLCRGYLIKPTTITECLHTFCRSCIILRFQDGEVNLCPTCNILIHETNPLEM-LRSDKTLEDIIYKLVPGLQEDEIRRTKEFYESYSLS 103
BLAST of Polycomb group ring finger 2 vs. Ensembl Nematostella
Match: EDO42686 (Predicted protein [Source:UniProtKB/TrEMBL;Acc:A7S0J2]) HSP 1 Score: 82.8037 bits (203), Expect = 2.561e-20 Identity = 40/99 (40.40%), Postives = 61/99 (61.62%), Query Frame = 1 Query: 55 KVKLSVLNAHLICALCGGYLIDPTMLTQCLHTFCKSCIFKYLEHNRYCPLCQCLIQETRMGKVSLKPDLILQKAIYKLVPNLLKSEMQNINYFYQNEEL 351 +VK++ LN H IC LC GYLI+P +T+C+HTFCKSC+ +++ CP+C +I ET +++ D +Q I K+ P L K E + FY+ + L Sbjct: 2 RVKVTDLNPHFICKLCNGYLINPVTITECIHTFCKSCLLRHISLVNRCPVCNEVIHET-TPIYNIRVDRTMQDIINKIFPKLEKEENRRERKFYRTKGL 99
BLAST of Polycomb group ring finger 2 vs. Ensembl Medaka
Match: ENSORLT00000040811.1 (polycomb group ring finger 2 [Source:NCBI gene;Acc:101173438]) HSP 1 Score: 105.531 bits (262), Expect = 3.792e-26 Identity = 71/226 (31.42%), Postives = 111/226 (49.12%), Query Frame = 1 Query: 55 KVKLSVLNAHLICALCGGYLIDPTMLTQCLHTFCKSCIFKYLEHNRYCPLCQCLIQETRMGKVSLKPDLILQKAIYKLVPNLLKSEMQNINYFY-QNEELNENE----FNVSSVEXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXTYKQKVTSENKXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXDILTNLIDKIVMENG-IFLLCSTQIKVDQVKKLILNKYHLNPHEYVTSLWYNDDCLNSDYTLSEIMFM 714 +VK++ LN HL C LC GYLID T + +CLH+FCK+CI +L+ N++CP C +Q++ ++S++ D LQ +YKLVP L K EM+ FY +N L E FN++ E + L + N + ++ T +K+ NG FL C + V + K + +K + P+ Y + Y D+ L YTL +I + Sbjct: 8 RVKITELNPHLTCPLCAGYLIDATTIVECLHSFCKTCIVTFLKTNKFCPRCDIQVQKS-CPQLSIRADKTLQDIVYKLVPGLFKDEMKRRRDFYAENRVLEPGEVVETFNIAEDEIISLSIQFYERNKNNERQRPETEGDKA-----------------------------NGKRFLQCPAAMSVMHLAKFLRSKMDI-PNNYRVEVLYGDEPLKDYYTLMDIAYF 202
BLAST of Polycomb group ring finger 2 vs. Ensembl Medaka
Match: bmi1a (bmi1 polycomb ring finger oncogene 1a [Source:NCBI gene;Acc:321505]) HSP 1 Score: 105.145 bits (261), Expect = 4.466e-26 Identity = 45/106 (42.45%), Postives = 71/106 (66.98%), Query Frame = 1 Query: 43 NNLSKVKLSVLNAHLICALCGGYLIDPTMLTQCLHTFCKSCIFKYLEHNRYCPLCQCLIQETRMGKVSLKPDLILQKAIYKLVPNLLKSEMQNINYFYQNEELNEN 360 + +++K++ LN HLIC LCGGY ID T + +CLH+FCK CI +YLE ++YCP+C + +T+ ++++ D LQ +YKLVP L K+EM+ FY ++ + Sbjct: 2 HRTTRIKITELNPHLICVLCGGYFIDATTIIECLHSFCKMCIVRYLETSKYCPICDVQVHKTKP-LLNIRSDKTLQDIVYKLVPGLFKNEMKRRRDFYAEHPVDAS 106
BLAST of Polycomb group ring finger 2 vs. Ensembl Medaka
Match: PCGF3 (polycomb group ring finger 3 [Source:NCBI gene;Acc:101171923]) HSP 1 Score: 94.3597 bits (233), Expect = 1.246e-22 Identity = 44/95 (46.32%), Postives = 63/95 (66.32%), Query Frame = 1 Query: 55 KVKLSVLNAHLICALCGGYLIDPTMLTQCLHTFCKSCIFKYLEHNRYCPLCQCLIQETRMGKVSLKPDLILQKAIYKLVPNLLKSEMQNINYFYQ 339 K+ L +NAH+ C LC GYLID T +T+CLHTFC+SC+ KYLE N CP C+ +I ++ + + D +Q +YKLVP L ++E++ FYQ Sbjct: 13 KINLCHINAHITCRLCEGYLIDATTVTECLHTFCRSCLVKYLEENNTCPTCRIVIHQSHPLQY-IGHDRTMQDIVYKLVPGLQEAEIKKQREFYQ 106
BLAST of Polycomb group ring finger 2 vs. Ensembl Medaka
Match: PCGF3 (polycomb group ring finger 3 [Source:NCBI gene;Acc:101171923]) HSP 1 Score: 94.3597 bits (233), Expect = 1.810e-22 Identity = 44/95 (46.32%), Postives = 63/95 (66.32%), Query Frame = 1 Query: 55 KVKLSVLNAHLICALCGGYLIDPTMLTQCLHTFCKSCIFKYLEHNRYCPLCQCLIQETRMGKVSLKPDLILQKAIYKLVPNLLKSEMQNINYFYQ 339 K+ L +NAH+ C LC GYLID T +T+CLHTFC+SC+ KYLE N CP C+ +I ++ + + D +Q +YKLVP L ++E++ FYQ Sbjct: 13 KINLCHINAHITCRLCEGYLIDATTVTECLHTFCRSCLVKYLEENNTCPTCRIVIHQSHPLQY-IGHDRTMQDIVYKLVPGLQEAEIKKQREFYQ 106
BLAST of Polycomb group ring finger 2 vs. Ensembl Medaka
Match: PCGF3 (polycomb group ring finger 3 [Source:NCBI gene;Acc:101171923]) HSP 1 Score: 94.3597 bits (233), Expect = 3.352e-22 Identity = 44/95 (46.32%), Postives = 63/95 (66.32%), Query Frame = 1 Query: 55 KVKLSVLNAHLICALCGGYLIDPTMLTQCLHTFCKSCIFKYLEHNRYCPLCQCLIQETRMGKVSLKPDLILQKAIYKLVPNLLKSEMQNINYFYQ 339 K+ L +NAH+ C LC GYLID T +T+CLHTFC+SC+ KYLE N CP C+ +I ++ + + D +Q +YKLVP L ++E++ FYQ Sbjct: 13 KINLCHINAHITCRLCEGYLIDATTVTECLHTFCRSCLVKYLEENNTCPTCRIVIHQSHPLQY-IGHDRTMQDIVYKLVPGLQEAEIKKQREFYQ 106
BLAST of Polycomb group ring finger 2 vs. Planmine SMEST
Match: SMESG000066342.1 (SMESG000066342.1) HSP 1 Score: 397.897 bits (1021), Expect = 1.602e-141 Identity = 244/245 (99.59%), Postives = 245/245 (100.00%), Query Frame = 1 Query: 37 MNNNLSKVKLSVLNAHLICALCGGYLIDPTMLTQCLHTFCKSCIFKYLEHNRYCPLCQCLIQETRMGKVSLKPDLILQKAIYKLVPNLLKSEMQNINYFYQNEELNENEFNVSSVEXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXTYKQKVTSENKXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXDILTNLIDKIVMENGIFLLCSTQIKVDQVKKLILNKYHLNPHEYVTSLWYNDDCLNSDYTLSEIMFMNKLEYPDGLNLLFDFTSSK 771 MNNNLSKVKLSVLNAHLICALCGGYLIDPTMLTQCLHTFCKSCIFKYLEHNRYCPLCQCLIQETRMGKVSLKPDLILQKAIYKLVPNLLKSEMQNINYFYQNEELNENEFNVSSVEKLCLL+NDDKLNLSLTYKQKVTSENKSSAPSTNSTSSPENESSDILTNLIDKIVMENGIFLLCSTQIKVDQVKKLILNKYHLNPHEYVTSLWYNDDCLNSDYTLSEIMFMNKLEYPDGLNLLFDFTSSK Sbjct: 1 MNNNLSKVKLSVLNAHLICALCGGYLIDPTMLTQCLHTFCKSCIFKYLEHNRYCPLCQCLIQETRMGKVSLKPDLILQKAIYKLVPNLLKSEMQNINYFYQNEELNENEFNVSSVEKLCLLENDDKLNLSLTYKQKVTSENKSSAPSTNSTSSPENESSDILTNLIDKIVMENGIFLLCSTQIKVDQVKKLILNKYHLNPHEYVTSLWYNDDCLNSDYTLSEIMFMNKLEYPDGLNLLFDFTSSK 245
BLAST of Polycomb group ring finger 2 vs. Planmine SMEST
Match: SMESG000076466.1 (SMESG000076466.1) HSP 1 Score: 87.8113 bits (216), Expect = 1.644e-20 Identity = 44/103 (42.72%), Postives = 66/103 (64.08%), Query Frame = 1 Query: 49 LSKVKLSVLNAHLICALCGGYLIDPTMLTQCLHTFCKSCIFKYLEHNRYCPLCQCLIQETRMGK-VSLKPDLILQKAIYKLVPNLLKSEMQNINYFYQNEELN 354 + K+K+S LN + C +C GYLID +T+CLHTFCKSCI KYLE N CP C+ +I + +S+ D +Q+ +YKLVPNL + E + +Y+ +++ Sbjct: 1 MKKIKVSSLNKFITCFICKGYLIDAVSVTECLHTFCKSCIVKYLEDNNDCPQCKIVIHLSHPENCISI--DRTMQEIVYKLVPNLKECERKRREEYYRGIDVD 101
BLAST of Polycomb group ring finger 2 vs. Planmine SMEST
Match: SMESG000072501.1 (SMESG000072501.1) HSP 1 Score: 86.2705 bits (212), Expect = 1.378e-19 Identity = 40/94 (42.55%), Postives = 61/94 (64.89%), Query Frame = 1 Query: 61 KLSVLNAHLICALCGGYLIDPTMLTQCLHTFCKSCIFKYLEHNRYCPLCQCLIQETRMGKVSLKPDLILQKAIYKLVPNLLKSEMQNINYFYQN 342 K+ LN + C LC GYLID T + +C+H+FCK+CI K+LE CP C+C + ET+ + +K D +LQ +Y+L P++ K EM++ F+ N Sbjct: 8 KVKDLNDFVKCNLCYGYLIDATTVIECMHSFCKTCIMKHLEDFNTCPTCECRLHETK-PYLDVKTDKVLQSIVYQLFPSVFKDEMKSRREFHSN 100
BLAST of Polycomb group ring finger 2 vs. Planmine SMEST
Match: SMESG000007981.1 (SMESG000007981.1) HSP 1 Score: 46.2098 bits (108), Expect = 7.233e-6 Identity = 23/57 (40.35%), Postives = 34/57 (59.65%), Query Frame = 1 Query: 70 VLNAHLICALCGGYLIDPTMLTQCLHTFCKSCIFKYLEHNRY----CPLCQCLIQET 228 ++ +L C +C Y I P ++T C HTFC+SC+ ++ RY CPLCQ I+ T Sbjct: 118 LIEDYLRCQICREYFIKP-VITNCGHTFCQSCLDQWALRTRYGGGNCPLCQHQIEYT 173
BLAST of Polycomb group ring finger 2 vs. Planmine SMEST
Match: SMESG000007981.1 (SMESG000007981.1) HSP 1 Score: 46.2098 bits (108), Expect = 8.759e-6 Identity = 23/57 (40.35%), Postives = 34/57 (59.65%), Query Frame = 1 Query: 70 VLNAHLICALCGGYLIDPTMLTQCLHTFCKSCIFKYLEHNRY----CPLCQCLIQET 228 ++ +L C +C Y I P ++T C HTFC+SC+ ++ RY CPLCQ I+ T Sbjct: 133 LIEDYLRCQICREYFIKP-VITNCGHTFCQSCLDQWALRTRYGGGNCPLCQHQIEYT 188 The following BLAST results are available for this feature:
BLAST of Polycomb group ring finger 2 vs. Ensembl Human
Analysis Date: 2016-08-08 (Schmidtea mediterranea smed_20140614 BLASTX Human e!99) Total hits: 5
BLAST of Polycomb group ring finger 2 vs. Ensembl Celegans
Analysis Date: 2020-05-01 (Schmidtea mediterranea smed_20140614 BLASTX Celegan e!99) Total hits: 2
BLAST of Polycomb group ring finger 2 vs. Ensembl Fly
Analysis Date: 2020-05-01 (Schmidtea mediterranea smed_20140614 BLASTX Drosophila e!99) Total hits: 5
BLAST of Polycomb group ring finger 2 vs. Ensembl Zebrafish
Analysis Date: 2016-08-08 (Schmidtea mediterranea smed_20140614 BLASTX Zebrafish e!99) Total hits: 5
BLAST of Polycomb group ring finger 2 vs. Ensembl Xenopus
Analysis Date: 2020-05-01 (Schmidtea mediterranea smed_20140614 BLASTX Xenopus e!99) Total hits: 5
BLAST of Polycomb group ring finger 2 vs. Ensembl Mouse
Analysis Date: 2020-05-01 (Schmidtea mediterranea smed_20140614 BLASTX Mouse e!99) Total hits: 5
BLAST of Polycomb group ring finger 2 vs. UniProt/SwissProt
Analysis Date: 2020-05-01 (Schmidtea mediterranea smed_20140614 BLASTX EMBL-EBI UniProt) Total hits: 5
BLAST of Polycomb group ring finger 2 vs. TrEMBL
Analysis Date: 2020-05-01 (Schmidtea mediterranea smed_20140614 BLASTX EMBL-EBI TrEMBL) Total hits: 5
BLAST of Polycomb group ring finger 2 vs. Ensembl Cavefish
Analysis Date: 2020-05-08 (Schmidtea mediterranea smed_20140614 BLASTX Cavefish e!99) Total hits: 5
BLAST of Polycomb group ring finger 2 vs. Ensembl Sea Lamprey
Analysis Date: 2020-05-08 (Schmidtea mediterranea smed_20140614 BLASTX Sea Lamprey e!99) Total hits: 5
BLAST of Polycomb group ring finger 2 vs. Ensembl Yeast
Analysis Date: 2020-05-08 (Schmidtea mediterranea smed_20140614 BLASTX Yeast e!Fungi46) Total hits: 0
BLAST of Polycomb group ring finger 2 vs. Ensembl Nematostella
Analysis Date: 2020-05-08 (Schmidtea mediterranea smed_20140614 BLASTX Nematostella e!Metazoa46) Total hits: 5
BLAST of Polycomb group ring finger 2 vs. Ensembl Medaka
Analysis Date: 2020-05-08 (Schmidtea mediterranea smed_20140614 BLASTX Medaka e!99) Total hits: 5
BLAST of Polycomb group ring finger 2 vs. Planmine SMEST
Analysis Date: 2020-05-08 (Schmidtea mediterranea smed_20140614 BLASTX Planmine SMEST) Total hits: 5
Analyses
This transcript is derived from or has results from the following analyses Sequences
The following sequences are available for this feature:
transcript sequence >SMED30005538 ID=SMED30005538|Name=Polycomb group ring finger 2|organism=Schmidtea mediterranea sexual|type=transcript|length=824bpback to top protein sequence of SMED30005538-orf-1 >SMED30005538-orf-1 ID=SMED30005538-orf-1|Name=SMED30005538-orf-1|organism=Schmidtea mediterranea sexual|type=polypeptide|length=246bp MNNNLSKVKLSVLNAHLICALCGGYLIDPTMLTQCLHTFCKSCIFKYLEHback to top Annotated Terms
The following terms have been associated with this transcript:
InterPro
Analysis Name: Schmidtea mediteranean smed_20140614 Interproscan
Date Performed: 2020-05-01
|